Suppr超能文献

比较使用心理物理学阈值和全景电诱发复合动作电位(PECAPs)估计的耳蜗内神经健康的个体特异性差异。

Comparing Patient-Specific Variations in Intra-Cochlear Neural Health Estimated Using Psychophysical Thresholds and Panoramic Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (PECAPs).

作者信息

Peng Tommy, Garcia Charlotte, Haneman Mica, Shader Maureen J, Carlyon Robert P, McKay Colette M

机构信息

The Bionics Institute, 384-388 Albert St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.

Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

出版信息

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2025 Feb;26(1):77-91. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00972-z. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Variations in neural survival along the cochlear implant electrode array leads to off-place listening, resulting in poorer speech understanding outcomes for recipients. Therefore, it is important to develop and compare clinically viable tests to identify these patient-specific intra-cochlear neural differences.

METHODS

Nineteen experienced cochlear implant recipients (9 males and 10 females) were recruited for this study. We estimated the neural health along the electrode array for a group of experienced adult implant recipients using two methods: the difference between psychophysical detection thresholds in bipolar vs. monopolar mode and the panoramic electrically evoked compound action potential method (PECAP). We hypothesised that: neural health estimated using both methods at single electrodes will be correlated at the participant level and the group level; and participants with larger variations in neural health along the electrode array will have poorer speech outcomes.

RESULTS

At the individual level, the two neural measures correlated significantly across electrodes (p < 0.05) for 5 out of 15 participants. At the group level, we observed a weak but significant across-electrode correlation (R = 0.111, p < 0.001). While a larger variation in neural measures estimated from psychophysical thresholds was associated with lower phoneme speech scores (R = 0.499, p < 0.01), no significant association was found between variations in PECAP's neural health estimates and phoneme speech scores (R = 0.082, p = 0.366).

CONCLUSION

Our evidence suggests that both methods likely quantify a shared underlying neural basis, hypothesised to be the neural health along the cochlear implant array. The differences between the two measures may be attributed to differences in stimulus rate or loudness used to elicit responses and/or the influence of factors arising more centrally than the auditory nerve.

摘要

目的

沿人工耳蜗电极阵列的神经存活差异会导致异位聆听,从而使接受者的言语理解结果更差。因此,开发并比较临床可行的测试以识别这些患者特异性的耳蜗内神经差异非常重要。

方法

本研究招募了19名有经验的人工耳蜗接受者(9名男性和10名女性)。我们使用两种方法估计一组有经验的成年植入接受者沿电极阵列的神经健康状况:双极与单极模式下心理物理检测阈值的差异以及全景电诱发复合动作电位方法(PECAP)。我们假设:在单个电极上使用这两种方法估计的神经健康状况在参与者水平和组水平上都将具有相关性;并且沿电极阵列神经健康状况变化较大的参与者言语结果较差。

结果

在个体水平上,15名参与者中有5名在电极间两种神经测量方法显著相关(p < 0.05)。在组水平上,我们观察到电极间存在微弱但显著的相关性(R = 0.111,p < 0.001)。虽然从心理物理阈值估计的神经测量变化较大与较低的音素言语得分相关(R = 0.499,p < 0.01),但在PECAP神经健康估计的变化与音素言语得分之间未发现显著关联(R = 0.082,p = 0.366)。

结论

我们的证据表明,这两种方法可能都量化了一个共同的潜在神经基础,假设为沿人工耳蜗阵列的神经健康状况。这两种测量方法之间的差异可能归因于用于引发反应的刺激率或响度的差异和/或比听神经更靠中枢产生的因素的影响。

相似文献

5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.

本文引用的文献

6
Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.耳鸣不干扰听觉和言语感知。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 29;40(31):6007-6017. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0396-20.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验