• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国长江流域能源效率评价的跨区域比较研究。

Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China.

机构信息

Business School, Hohai University, Focheng West Road No.8, Nanjing, 211100, People's Republic of China.

Business School, Hohai University, Jinling North Road No. 200, Changzhou, 213022, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(27):34037-34051. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z
PMID:32557066
Abstract

This paper selects energy consumption data of 11 provinces in YRB and 19 provinces and cities in non-YRB from 2014 to 2016 and constructs a shared border Metafrontier non-radial directional short model, adding CO and AQI indicators as undesirable factors, in order to evaluate the total efficiency and the input and output efficiencies of these two regions. The results are as follows. (1) From the changes in the score and ranking of the two regions' total environmental efficiency, only two provinces in YRB show a slight decrease, while most of them show a stable or rising trend; seven provinces in non-YRB have a low rising rate. This means during the study period that YRB made more progress at energy conservation, emission reduction, and pollution control than other provinces and cities in non-YRB. (2) The efficiency scores of energy consumption, GDP, CO, and AQI emissions are different in each province. Overall, the situation of YRB is better than that of non-YRB. Not only is the efficiency score of each index higher, but the efficiency difference between provinces and cities within the region is small, which is conducive to the linkage effect of the region and the realization of green coordinated development.

摘要

本文选取了 2014-2016 年中国 11 个沿黄省份和 19 个非沿黄省份和城市的能源消费数据,构建了共享边界 Metafrontier 非径向定向短距离模型,加入 CO 和 AQI 指标作为非期望产出,以评价两个区域的全要素效率以及投入和产出效率。结果表明:(1)从两个区域全要素环境效率的得分和排名变化来看,沿黄省份仅有两个省份呈现出微弱的下降趋势,其他大部分省份则呈现出稳定或上升的趋势;而非沿黄省份七个省份的上升率较低。这说明在研究期间,沿黄省份在节能减排和污染控制方面比非沿黄省份的其他省份和城市取得了更大的进展。(2)能源消费、GDP、CO 和 AQI 排放的效率得分在各省之间存在差异。总体而言,沿黄省份的情况要好于非沿黄省份。不仅每个指数的效率得分更高,而且区域内各城市之间的效率差异较小,这有利于区域的联动效应和绿色协调发展的实现。

相似文献

1
Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China.中国长江流域能源效率评价的跨区域比较研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(27):34037-34051. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
2
Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China's Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier.基于超前沿的中国长江经济带碳排放效率的跨区域比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 20;16(4):619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040619.
3
Yangtze River Basin Environmental Regulation Efficiency Based on the Empirical Analysis of 97 Cities from 2005 to 2016.基于2005年至2016年97个城市实证分析的长江流域环境规制效率
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115697.
4
A modified dynamic DEA model to assess the wastewater treatment efficiency: perspective from Yangtze River and Non-Yangtze River Basin.一个改进的动态 DEA 模型来评估污水处理效率:来自长江和非长江流域的视角。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):9931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14105-0.
5
A comparative analysis of the levels and drivers of regional coordinated development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin, China.中国长江经济带与黄河流域区域协调发展水平及驱动因素的比较分析
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 20;10(5):e26513. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26513. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
6
Eco-efficiency evaluation model: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.生态效率评价模型:以长江经济带为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Jul 2;193(7):457. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09228-2.
7
Carbon emission efficiency measurement and influencing factor analysis of nine provinces in the Yellow River basin: based on SBM-DDF model and Tobit-CCD model.黄河流域九省碳排放量效率测度及影响因素分析:基于 SBM-DDF 模型和 Tobit-CCD 模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):33263-33280. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18566-8. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
Influencing factors and improvement paths of green water use efficiency in the Yellow River Basin: a new perspective based on ecogeographical divisions.黄河流域绿色水利用效率的影响因素及提升路径:基于生态地理分区的新视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):14604-14618. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22981-2. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
9
Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and dynamic efficiency decomposition of carbon emission efficiency in the Yellow River Basin.黄河流域碳排放效率的时空演变特征及动态效率分解。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0264274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264274. eCollection 2022.
10
Spatiotemporal Pattern and Convergence Test of Energy Eco-Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin.黄河流域能源生态效率的时空格局及收敛性检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1888. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031888.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study on the Mechanism and Strategy of Cross-Regional Emergency Cooperation for Natural Disasters in China-Based on the Perspective of Evolutionary Game Theory.中国自然灾害跨区域应急协同的机制与策略研究——基于演化博弈论的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 5;18(21):11624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111624.