Suppr超能文献

腹膜后肉瘤围手术期风险分层:美国肉瘤协作组对美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)风险计算器的评估

Retroperitoneal sarcoma perioperative risk stratification: A United States Sarcoma Collaborative evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator.

作者信息

Schwartz Patrick B, Stahl Christopher C, Ethun Cecilia, Marka Nicholas, Poultsides George A, Roggin Kevin K, Fields Ryan C, Howard John H, Clarke Callisia N, Votanopoulos Konstantinos I, Cardona Kenneth, Abbott Daniel E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;122(4):795-802. doi: 10.1002/jso.26071. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ACS-NSQIP risk calculator predicts perioperative risk. This study tested the calculator's ability to predict risk for outcomes following retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) resection.

METHODS

The United States Sarcoma Collaborative database was queried for adults who underwent RPS resection. Estimated risk for outcomes was calculated twice in the risk calculator, once using sarcoma-specific CPT codes and once using codes indicative of most comorbid organ resection (eg nephrectomy). ROC curves were generated, with area under the curve (AUC) and Brier scores reported to assess discrimination and calibration. An AUC < 0.6 was considered ineffective discrimination. A negative ▲ Brier indicated improved performance relative to baseline outcome rates.

RESULTS

In total, 482 patients were identified with a 42.3% 90-day complication rate. Discrimination was poor for all outcomes except "all complications" and "renal failure." Baseline outcome rates were better predictors than calculator estimates except for "discharge to nursing or rehab facility" and "renal failure." Replacing sarcoma-specific CPT codes with resection-specific codes did not improve performance.

CONCLUSION

The ACS-NSQIP risk calculator poorly predicted outcomes following RPS resection. Changing sarcoma-specific CPT to resection-specific codes did not improve performance. Comorbidities in the calculator may not effectively capture perioperative risk. Future work should evaluate a sarcoma-specific calculator.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)风险计算器可预测围手术期风险。本研究测试了该计算器预测腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)切除术后结局风险的能力。

方法

在美国肉瘤协作数据库中查询接受RPS切除术的成年人。在风险计算器中对结局的估计风险进行了两次计算,一次使用肉瘤特异性的现行程序编码(CPT),另一次使用指示大多数合并器官切除的编码(如肾切除术)。生成ROC曲线,并报告曲线下面积(AUC)和Brier评分以评估区分度和校准度。AUC < 0.6被认为区分度不佳。Brier评分呈负值表明相对于基线结局发生率,性能有所改善。

结果

共识别出482例患者,90天并发症发生率为42.3%。除“所有并发症”和“肾衰竭”外,所有结局的区分度均较差。除“出院至护理或康复机构”和“肾衰竭”外,基线结局发生率比计算器估计值更能预测结局。用手术特异性编码替代肉瘤特异性CPT编码并未改善性能。

结论

ACS-NSQIP风险计算器对RPS切除术后结局的预测效果不佳。将肉瘤特异性CPT改为手术特异性编码并未改善性能。计算器中的合并症可能无法有效反映围手术期风险。未来的工作应评估肉瘤特异性计算器。

相似文献

2
Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-day Complications After Spine Surgery?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):621-628. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003340.
3
Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Cervical Spine Surgery?
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Nov;32(9):357-362. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000890.
7
Validation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in older patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jul;13(6):788-795. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Inaccurate Risk Assessment by the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Aortic Surgery.
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 20;10(22):5426. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225426.
10
Performance Assessment of the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Jun 15;48(12):825-831. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004644. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of the Bone Tumor Surgery Complexity Score.
Reports (MDPI). 2024 May 10;7(2):35. doi: 10.3390/reports7020035.
3
Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS): A Systematic Review.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01690-2.
5
Nomogram to predict postoperative complications in elderly with total hip replacement.
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Apr 26;10(12):3720-3728. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3720.

本文引用的文献

3
Evaluating the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Nov;23(11):2225-2231. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04120-4. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Mar;24(3):551-559. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04174-4. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
5
Studying a Rare Disease Using Multi-Institutional Research Collaborations vs Big Data: Where Lies the Truth?
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Sep;227(3):357-366.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
7
Current principles of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas.
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;117(1):33-41. doi: 10.1002/jso.24919. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验