• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可解释机器学习模型用于预测接受重大手术的癌症住院患者术后并发症。

Explainable Machine Learning Model to Preoperatively Predict Postoperative Complications in Inpatients With Cancer Undergoing Major Operations.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

Department of Applied AI and Data Science, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Apr;8:e2300247. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00247.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.23.00247
PMID:38648576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11161247/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Preoperative prediction of postoperative complications (PCs) in inpatients with cancer is challenging. We developed an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PCs in a heterogenous population of inpatients with cancer undergoing same-hospitalization major operations.

METHODS

Consecutive inpatients who underwent same-hospitalization operations from December 2017 to June 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The ML model was developed and tested using electronic health record (EHR) data to predict 30-day PCs for patients with Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher (CD 3+) per the CD classification system. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), and calibration plots. Model explanation was performed using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method at cohort and individual operation levels.

RESULTS

A total of 988 operations in 827 inpatients were included. The ML model was trained using 788 operations and tested using a holdout set of 200 operations. The CD 3+ complication rates were 28.6% and 27.5% in the training and holdout test sets, respectively. Training and holdout test sets' model performance in predicting CD 3+ complications yielded an AUROC of 0.77 and 0.73 and an AUPRC of 0.56 and 0.52, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrated good reliability. The SHAP method identified features and the contributions of the features to the risk of PCs.

CONCLUSION

We trained and tested an explainable ML model to predict the risk of developing PCs in patients with cancer. Using patient-specific EHR data, the ML model accurately discriminated the risk of developing CD 3+ complications and displayed top features at the individual operation and cohort level.

摘要

目的

预测癌症住院患者术后并发症(PCs)具有挑战性。我们开发了一种可解释的机器学习(ML)模型,以预测在同一家医院接受同种住院大手术的癌症住院患者的异质人群中的 PCs。

方法

回顾性分析了 2017 年 12 月至 2021 年 6 月期间在一家单机构接受同种住院手术的连续住院患者。使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据开发和测试 ML 模型,以根据 Clavien-Dindo 分级系统(CD 分类系统)预测 CD3+患者(CD 分级 3 或更高)的 30 天 PCs。使用接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、精度召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)和校准图评估模型性能。在队列和个体手术水平使用 Shapley 加性解释(SHAP)方法进行模型解释。

结果

共纳入 827 名患者的 988 次手术。该 ML 模型使用 788 次手术进行训练,并使用 200 次手术的保留数据集进行测试。训练和保留测试集的 CD3+并发症发生率分别为 28.6%和 27.5%。训练和保留测试集在预测 CD3+并发症方面的模型性能分别产生了 0.77 和 0.73 的 AUROC 和 0.56 和 0.52 的 AUPRC。校准图表明可靠性良好。SHAP 方法确定了特征以及特征对 PCs 风险的贡献。

结论

我们训练和测试了一种可解释的 ML 模型,以预测癌症患者发生 PCs 的风险。使用患者特定的 EHR 数据,ML 模型准确区分了发生 CD3+并发症的风险,并显示了个体手术和队列水平的顶级特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/5b5aebbe5ab7/cci-8-e2300247-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/79545c20cf26/cci-8-e2300247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/084afa8815b5/cci-8-e2300247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/8ee19afc3f8c/cci-8-e2300247-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/c5f259227d74/cci-8-e2300247-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/5b5aebbe5ab7/cci-8-e2300247-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/79545c20cf26/cci-8-e2300247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/084afa8815b5/cci-8-e2300247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/8ee19afc3f8c/cci-8-e2300247-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/c5f259227d74/cci-8-e2300247-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/297c/11161247/5b5aebbe5ab7/cci-8-e2300247-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Explainable Machine Learning Model to Preoperatively Predict Postoperative Complications in Inpatients With Cancer Undergoing Major Operations.可解释机器学习模型用于预测接受重大手术的癌症住院患者术后并发症。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Apr;8:e2300247. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00247.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Development of machine learning model for predicting prolonged operation time in lumbar stenosis undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.用于预测接受后路腰椎椎间融合术的腰椎管狭窄症患者手术时间延长的机器学习模型的开发:一项多中心研究。
Spine J. 2025 Mar;25(3):460-473. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
5
Serum calcium-based interpretable machine learning model for predicting anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: A multi-center study.基于血清钙的直肠癌切除术后吻合口漏预测可解释机器学习模型:一项多中心研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 21;31(19):105283. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i19.105283.
6
90-day mortality prediction in elective visceral surgery using machine learning: a retrospective multicenter development, validation, and comparison study.使用机器学习预测择期内脏手术90天死亡率:一项回顾性多中心开发、验证和比较研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3742-3751. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002372. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
7
Interpretable machine learning for predicting isolated basal septal hypertrophy.用于预测孤立性基底间隔肥厚的可解释机器学习。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0325992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325992. eCollection 2025.
8
Preoperative prediction of major adverse outcomes after total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection based on machine learning ensemble.基于机器学习集成的急性A型主动脉夹层全弓置换术后主要不良结局的术前预测
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06936-4.
9
External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients.脊柱转移瘤手术中大量失血的机器学习预测模型的外部验证:一项使用880例患者的多机构研究。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1386-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
10
Risk Prediction of Diabetic Foot Amputation Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.使用机器学习和可解释人工智能对糖尿病足截肢进行风险预测
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan 30:19322968241228606. doi: 10.1177/19322968241228606.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Clavien Dindo Classification ≥ Grade III Complications After Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery Using Machine Learning Methods.使用机器学习方法预测上皮性卵巢癌手术后Clavien Dindo分级≥Ⅲ级并发症
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 10;61(4):695. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040695.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator in the prediction of postoperative complications in oncogeriatric patients after curative surgery for abdominal tumors.美国外科医师学院手术风险计算器在预测腹部肿瘤根治术后老年肿瘤患者术后并发症中的疗效。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;126(7):1359-1366. doi: 10.1002/jso.27046. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
Machine Learning Risk Prediction Model of 90-day Mortality After Gastrectomy for Cancer.胃癌术后 90 天死亡率的机器学习风险预测模型。
Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):776-783. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005616. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
3
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Major Complications After Cytoreductive Surgery.
细胞减灭术后主要并发症的可解释机器学习模型的开发和验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212930. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12930.
4
Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform.基于电子健康记录数据的机器学习算法预测术后并发症的性能及移动平台报告。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211973. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11973.
5
Axillary surgery and complication rates after mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer: an analysis of the NSQIP database.乳腺癌乳房切除术和重建术后腋窝手术及并发症发生率:NSQIP 数据库分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Apr;192(3):501-508. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06540-4. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
6
Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.基于机器学习的随机森林可预测直肠癌前切除术后的吻合口漏。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Jun;12(3):921-932. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-436.
7
Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after esophagectomy in older adults: A SEER-Medicare analysis.老年患者食管癌根治术后并发症对长期生存的影响:SEER-Medicare 分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;124(5):751-766. doi: 10.1002/jso.26587. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
8
On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study.癌症患者术后并发症的可预测性:一项葡萄牙队列研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01562-2.
9
Frequency of Preoperative Advance Care Planning for Older Adults Undergoing High-risk Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.高龄高危手术患者术前预先医疗照护计划的实施频率:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):e211521. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1521. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
10
Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning.机器学习预测心脏手术后急性肾损伤的发生。
Crit Care. 2020 Jul 31;24(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03179-9.