Suppr超能文献

水泥生产中各类燃烧灰烬回收利用的环境视角——综述

Environmental perspectives of recycling various combustion ashes in cement production - A review.

作者信息

Yin Ke, Ahamed Ashiq, Lisak Grzegorz

机构信息

Residue and Resource Reclamation Centre (R3C), Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Cleantech Loop, CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore.

Residue and Resource Reclamation Centre (R3C), Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Cleantech Loop, CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Aug;78:401-416. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

Abstract

Recycling different types of ashes for cement production has gained increasing attentions worldwide in a bid to close the waste loop. It minimizes waste landfilling and meanwhile produces useful secondary materials with reduced costs. Ascribed to the presence of elevated metal concentrations, however, it also receives negative inclination for their reuse. Herein, recycling various combustion ashes, such as municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes (MSWI FA), municipal solid waste incineration bottom ashes (MSWI BA), coal fly ashes (CFA), coal bottom ashes (CBA), blast furnace slags (BFS), biomass ashes (BIOA), sewage sludge ashes (SSA) and different co-combustion ashes (CCA), were comprehensively reviewed, from environmental perspectives combined with statistical data analysis (e.g. bulk components, trace metals, leaching potential, and etc.), to quantitatively explore their feasibility during cement production. It was unveiled that pozzolanic contents were predominant which highly fluctuated in their composition based on the ash type, limiting the replacement at maximum of 5-10 wt%. Considering total metal criteria, heavy metal contents posed challenges as secondary raw materials for blended cements. However, in consideration of metal leaching criteria, exothermic pozzolanic reactions in the second phase of blended cement would sufficiently alleviate their leaching potential, ensuring the environmental feasibility. Apart from the above, treatment costs have to be evaluated in nexus of multiple factors, whereas government policies play significant roles in valorization of recycling ashes. From sustainability perspective, life cycle assessment promises the overall strategy on ash utilization in cement industry.

摘要

为了实现废物循环利用,在全球范围内,回收不同类型的灰烬用于水泥生产已受到越来越多的关注。这既能最大限度地减少废物填埋,又能以降低成本的方式生产有用的二次材料。然而,由于金属浓度升高,其再利用也受到负面倾向。在此,从环境角度结合统计数据分析(如主要成分、痕量金属、浸出潜力等),对回收各种燃烧灰烬进行了全面综述,包括城市固体废弃物焚烧飞灰(MSWI FA)、城市固体废弃物焚烧底灰(MSWI BA)、煤飞灰(CFA)、煤底灰(CBA)、高炉矿渣(BFS)、生物质灰(BIOA)、污水污泥灰(SSA)以及不同的共燃灰烬(CCA),以定量探索它们在水泥生产过程中的可行性。结果表明,火山灰成分占主导,但其组成因灰的类型而异,波动很大,这限制了其最大替代量为5 - 10 wt%。考虑到总金属标准,重金属含量作为混合水泥的二次原料构成了挑战。然而,考虑到金属浸出标准,混合水泥第二阶段的放热火山灰反应将充分减轻其浸出潜力,确保环境可行性。除此之外,必须在多种因素的关联中评估处理成本,而政府政策在回收灰烬的增值过程中发挥着重要作用。从可持续性角度来看,生命周期评估为水泥行业灰烬利用提供了总体战略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验