Suppr超能文献

用于评估心肺适能的FRIEND和美国运动医学会(ACSM)公式的验证:与冠心病患者直接测量结果的比较

Validation of FRIEND and ACSM Equations for Cardiorespiratory Fitness: Comparison to Direct Measurement in CAD Patients.

作者信息

Jang Won Young, Kang Dong Oh, Park Yoonjee, Lee Jieun, Kim Woohyeun, Choi Jah Yeon, Roh Seung-Young, Jang Yuna, Park Se-Hyun, Kim Woo-Sub, Na Jin Oh, Choi Cheol Ung, Rha Seung-Woon, Park Chang Gyu, Seo Hong Seog, Kim Eung Ju

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Suwon 16247, Korea.

Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 17;9(6):1889. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061889.

Abstract

The regression equation of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) was a preferred method for estimating maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max). Recently, a more precise equation from the fitness registry and the importance of exercise national database (FRIEND) for healthy people was developed. This study compared VO2max estimated by the ACSM and FRIEND equations to VO2max directly measured in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Overall, 293 CAD patients who participated in cardiac rehabilitation between June 2015 and December 2018 were analyzed. Directly measured VO2max values were compared to the ACSM and FRIEND equations. The directly measured VO2max was significantly different from the estimated VO2max by ACSM equation (24.16 vs. 28.7 mL/kg/min, < 0.001), which was overestimated by 20% in men and 16% in women. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the directly measured VO2max and the estimated VO2max by the FRIEND equation. (24.16 vs. 24.15 mL/kg/min, = 0.986). In CAD patients, the estimated VO2max from the ACSM equation was significantly higher than the directly measured VO2max. In addition, estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) by the FRIEND equation showed similar results with directly measured CRF. As a result, the FRIEND equation can predict CRF more accurately than the ACSM.

摘要

美国运动医学学院(ACSM)的回归方程是估计最大摄氧量(VO2max)的首选方法。最近,针对健康人群开发了一个来自健身注册与运动国家数据库重要性(FRIEND)的更精确方程。本研究将由ACSM和FRIEND方程估算的VO2max与在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中直接测量的VO2max进行了比较。总体而言,对2015年6月至2018年12月期间参与心脏康复的293例CAD患者进行了分析。将直接测量的VO2max值与ACSM和FRIEND方程进行比较。直接测量的VO2max与通过ACSM方程估算的VO2max有显著差异(24.16 vs. 28.7 mL/kg/min,<0.001),在男性中高估了20%,在女性中高估了16%。然而,直接测量的VO2max与通过FRIEND方程估算的VO2max之间没有统计学上的显著差异(24.16 vs. 24.15 mL/kg/min,=0.986)。在CAD患者中,ACSM方程估算的VO2max显著高于直接测量的VO2max。此外,FRIEND方程估算的心肺适能(CRF)与直接测量的CRF结果相似。因此,FRIEND方程比ACSM能更准确地预测CRF。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/437d/7356312/0c607704f491/jcm-09-01889-g001a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验