Department of Prosthodontics and Material Sciences, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Abteilung für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Alterszahnmedizin und Funktionslehre, Berlin, Germany.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Sep;32(6):593-600. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12594. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
Visual shade selection is the most commonly used method in dentistry and a challenge for every dentist. However, differences to natural tooth color and the differences of each shade guide are well known. The aim of this paper is to investigate the suitability of two different color scales for determining the color of no-match templates.
Volunteers (N = 76) selected a shade color of a no-match template with two shade guides (VITA Classical shade guide (VC) and VITA Linearguide 3D-Master (V3D LG), both Vita Zahnfabrik). The neutral grey background was laterally illuminated with a color differentiation lamp (Dialite, Eickhorst GmbH). For the volunteers' accuracy, the triangle's area was used which are emerge by the color coordinates of a template (L a b ) and the color coordinates of the two decisions (L a b and L a b ). Statistical software was used to evaluate the differences in ΔE with α = .01.
A deviation in the median of ΔE of 7.6 (V3D LG, first choice) to 6.6 (VC, second choice) was detected, while U test showed no significant differences in the median for both color scales. But the triangle's area generated by both shade decisions and tooth color with V3D LG was significant smaller (14.2) then VC (19.2) (P ≤ .001).
When comparing both results no significant difference in the subject's shade selection and the shade guides was detected. The new evaluation strategy using the size of the triangle's areas proves the superiority of the V3D LG due to a better distribution of the tooth color shades within the color space.
视觉比色是口腔医学中最常用的方法,也是每个牙医都面临的挑战。然而,天然牙色的差异以及每个比色板的差异是众所周知的。本文旨在研究两种不同比色板在确定不匹配模板颜色方面的适用性。
志愿者(N=76)使用两种比色板(VITA Classical 比色板(VC)和 VITA Linearguide 3D-Master(V3D LG),均来自 Vita Zahnfabrik)选择不匹配模板的比色。中性灰色背景由色彩分光光度计(Dialite,Eickhorst GmbH)从侧面照明。为了评估志愿者的准确性,使用模板的颜色坐标(L a b)和两个决策的颜色坐标(L a b 和 L a b)所形成的三角形区域。使用统计软件评估ΔE 的差异,α=0.01。
检测到 V3D LG(第一选择)的ΔE 中位数偏差为 7.6,而 VC(第二选择)的中位数偏差为 6.6,而 U 检验显示两种比色板的中位数差异无统计学意义。但是,V3D LG 生成的两个比色决策和牙齿颜色的三角形区域明显较小(14.2),而 VC(19.2)(P≤0.001)。
当比较两种结果时,未发现受试者比色和比色板的选择有显著差异。使用三角形区域大小的新评估策略证明了 V3D LG 的优越性,因为它在颜色空间内更好地分布了牙齿颜色色调。