Siva Shankar, Correa Rohann J M, Warner Andrew, Staehler Michael, Ellis Rodney J, Ponsky Lee, Kaplan Irving D, Mahadevan Anand, Chu William, Gandhidasan Senthilkumar, Swaminath Anand, Onishi Hiroshi, Teh Bin S, Lo Simon S, Muacevic Alexander, Louie Alexander V
Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):941-949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Patients with larger (T1b, >4 cm) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) not suitable for surgery have few treatment options because thermal ablation is less effective in this setting. We hypothesize that SABR represents an effective, safe, and nephron-sparing alternative for large RCC.
Individual patient data from 9 institutions in Germany, Australia, USA, Canada, and Japan were pooled. Patients with T1a tumors, M1 disease, and/or upper tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Demographics, treatment, oncologic, and renal function outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were generated for oncologic outcomes.
Ninety-five patients were included. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. Median age was 76 years, median tumor diameter was 4.9 cm, and 81.1% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 (or Karnofsky performance status ≥70%). In patients for whom operability details were reported, 77.6% were defined as inoperable as determined by the referring urologist. Mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 57.2 mL/min (mild-to-moderate dysfunction), with 30% of the cohort having moderate-to-severe dysfunction (eGFR <45mL/min). After SABR, eGFR decreased by 7.9 mL/min. Three patients (3.2%) required dialysis. Thirty-eight patients (40%) had a grade 1 to 2 toxicity. No grade 3 to 5 toxicities were reported. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and progression-free survival were 96.1%, 83.7%, and 81.0% at 2 years and 91.4%, 69.2%, 64.9% at 4 years, respectively. Local, distant, and any failure at 4 years were 2.9%, 11.1%, and 12.1% (cumulative incidence function with death as competing event). On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with inferior cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio per 1 cm increase: 1.30; P < .001).
SABR for larger RCC in this older, largely medically inoperable cohort, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability and had modest impact on renal function. SABR appears to be a viable treatment option in this patient population.
对于不适合手术的较大(T1b,>4cm)肾细胞癌(RCC)患者,治疗选择有限,因为热消融在此情况下效果较差。我们假设立体定向体部放疗(SABR)是大型RCC一种有效、安全且保留肾单位的替代治疗方法。
汇总了来自德国、澳大利亚、美国、加拿大和日本9家机构的个体患者数据。排除T1a肿瘤、M1期疾病和/或上尿路尿路上皮癌患者。使用描述性统计评估人口统计学、治疗、肿瘤学和肾功能结果。生成Kaplan-Meier估计值以及肿瘤学结果的单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归。
纳入95例患者。中位随访时间为2.7年。中位年龄为76岁,中位肿瘤直径为4.9cm,81.1%的东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0至1(或卡诺夫斯基体能状态≥70%)。在报告了可手术性细节的患者中,77.6%被转诊泌尿外科医生判定为不可手术。平均基线估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)为57.2mL/分钟(轻度至中度功能障碍),30%的队列有中度至重度功能障碍(eGFR<45mL/分钟)。SABR后,eGFR下降了7.9mL/分钟。3例患者(3.2%)需要透析。38例患者(40%)出现1至2级毒性反应。未报告3至5级毒性反应。2年时癌症特异性生存率、总生存率和无进展生存率分别为96.1%、83.7%和81.0%,4年时分别为91.4%、69.2%和64.9%。4年时局部、远处和任何部位的复发率分别为2.9%、11.1%和12.1%(以死亡作为竞争事件的累积发病率函数)。多变量分析显示,肿瘤大小增加与较差的癌症特异性生存率相关(每增加1cm的风险比:1.30;P<.001)。
在这个年龄较大、大多无法进行手术治疗的队列中,SABR治疗较大RCC显示出疗效和耐受性,对肾功能影响较小。SABR似乎是该患者群体可行的治疗选择。