Suppr超能文献

欺骗与安慰剂的伦理道德。

Deception and the ethics of placebo.

机构信息

Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020;153:147-163. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2020.03.030. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

Abstract

The placebo effect in many areas of neurological therapeutics is common and prominent. The importance of the response means that any new treatment must account for the placebo effect, but this in turn raises major challenges as to how to conduct scientifically meaningful research in an ethically acceptable fashion. Basic principles that may be in tension with one another are those of beneficence and respect for autonomy. It may be challenging to respect autonomy if the scientific design of a study depends upon the use of deception, but this is often mitigated by the information provided to trial participants as part of the informed consent process. Deception is a particular challenge if placebos are to be used in a clinical/therapeutic setting, outside the context of a clinical trial. While practice-based placebo use may on occasion be both beneficial and ethically acceptable, close attention must then be paid to ensuring that basic ethical principles are respected and that placebos are either prescribed in an open and honest fashion, or that any deception is authorized.

摘要

安慰剂效应在神经治疗学的许多领域都很常见且突出。这种反应的重要性意味着任何新的治疗方法都必须考虑到安慰剂效应,但这反过来又提出了重大挑战,即如何以符合伦理的方式进行有意义的科学研究。可能相互冲突的基本原则是善行和尊重自主权。如果研究的科学设计取决于欺骗的使用,那么尊重自主权可能具有挑战性,但这通常可以通过知情同意过程中向试验参与者提供的信息来减轻。如果安慰剂要在临床试验之外的临床/治疗环境中使用,那么欺骗就是一个特别的挑战。虽然基于实践的安慰剂使用有时可能既有益又符合伦理,但随后必须密切关注确保尊重基本伦理原则,并且以公开诚实的方式开处安慰剂,或者授权任何欺骗行为。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验