• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在开车送餐时使用手机?人格、风险感知和驾驶自我效能的作用。

Who uses a mobile phone while driving for food delivery? The role of personality, risk perception, and driving self-efficacy.

机构信息

School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.

School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2020 Jun;73:69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.014
PMID:32563410
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The existing literature on mobile phone use while driving (MPUWD) mainly targets the participants from general population and the young adults, however, few studies pay attention to this form of distracted driving with samples in professional contexts. The present study aims to bridge the gap by identifying the extent of and the motives behind making use of mobile phones while driving for food dispatch among deliveryman.

METHOD

The snowball sampling was used to collect the data (N = 317) through a self-reported questionnaire, including demographics, personality traits, risk perception, driving self-efficacy, and mobile phone use while driving.

RESULTS

Descriptive analysis for the assessed MPUWD behaviors showed that 96.3% (N = 315) of food deliveryman undertook the MPUWD behaviors, though disproportionate distribution among these behaviors existed. Structural equation modeling analysis displayed that psychoticism and driving self-efficacy directly predicted the MPUWD behaviors. The mediating role of driving self-efficacy was verified with the findings that driving self-efficacy completely mediated the relationships that between risk perception and MPUWD behaviors and that between extraversion and MPUWD behaviors, as well as partially mediated the correlation between psychoticism and MPUWD behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirms the prevalence of MPUWD behaviors among food deliveryman. The SEM estimates and bootstrap estimates suggest that personality traits and perceived risk perception per se display limited predicting utility to MPUWD behaviors among food deliveryman, whereas driving self-efficacy and the proposed predictors together well illustrate the assessed MPUWD behaviors among food deliveryman. Practical Applications: These findings imply that developing and implementing intervention efforts in a concerted way would curb these behaviors effectively.

摘要

引言

现有关于开车时使用手机(MPUWD)的文献主要针对普通人群和年轻人的参与者,然而,很少有研究关注这种在专业环境下的分心驾驶形式。本研究旨在通过确定外卖员在驾驶过程中使用手机的程度和动机来填补这一空白。

方法

采用滚雪球抽样法,通过自报式问卷收集数据(N=317),包括人口统计学、人格特质、风险感知、驾驶自我效能感和驾驶时使用手机。

结果

对评估的 MPUWD 行为进行描述性分析表明,96.3%(N=315)的外卖员从事 MPUWD 行为,但这些行为的分布不均。结构方程模型分析显示,精神病态和驾驶自我效能直接预测 MPUWD 行为。驾驶自我效能的中介作用得到了验证,研究结果表明,驾驶自我效能完全中介了风险感知与 MPUWD 行为之间的关系,以及外向性与 MPUWD 行为之间的关系,部分中介了精神病态与 MPUWD 行为之间的关系。

结论

本研究证实了外卖员开车时使用手机的行为普遍存在。SEM 估计和自举估计表明,人格特质和感知风险感知本身对外卖员的 MPUWD 行为预测能力有限,而驾驶自我效能和所提出的预测因素共同很好地说明了外卖员的评估 MPUWD 行为。

实际应用

这些发现表明,以协同方式制定和实施干预措施将有效地遏制这些行为。

相似文献

1
Who uses a mobile phone while driving for food delivery? The role of personality, risk perception, and driving self-efficacy.谁在开车送餐时使用手机?人格、风险感知和驾驶自我效能的作用。
J Safety Res. 2020 Jun;73:69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Adolescent and adult drivers' mobile phone use while driving with different interlocutors.青少年和成年驾驶员在驾车时与不同 interlocutors 通话时使用手机的情况。 (注:interlocutors 这个词在原文语境中可能不太准确,正常可能是想说“通话对象”之类的意思,但按要求逐字翻译就是这样。)
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
3
Who is a Distracted Driver? Associations between Mobile Phone Use while Driving, Domain-Specific Risk Taking, and Personality.谁是分心驾驶的人?驾驶时使用手机、特定领域的冒险行为与个性之间的关联。
Risk Anal. 2017 Nov;37(11):2119-2131. doi: 10.1111/risa.12773. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
4
Differential impact of personality traits on distracted driving behaviors in teens and older adults.人格特质对青少年和老年人分心驾驶行为的不同影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
5
Different types of mobile phone use while driving and influencing factors on intention and behavior: Insights from an expanded theory of planned behavior.驾驶时使用手机的不同类型及其对意图和行为的影响因素:基于扩展计划行为理论的见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 6;19(3):e0300158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300158. eCollection 2024.
6
Psychosocial factors associated with the self-reported frequency of cell phone use while driving in Iran.与伊朗人开车时使用手机的自我报告频率相关的心理社会因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0249827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249827. eCollection 2021.
7
Mobile phone use among car drivers and motorcycle riders: The effect of problematic mobile phone use, attitudes, beliefs and perceived risk.手机使用与汽车司机和摩托车骑手:问题手机使用行为、态度、信念和感知风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Aug;143:105592. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105592. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
"It is frustrating to not have control even though I know it's not legal!": A mixed-methods investigation on applications to prevent mobile phone use while driving.“即使我知道这是不合法的,但却无法控制自己,这真令人沮丧!”:一项关于申请防止开车时使用手机的混合方法研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;137:105412. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105412. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
The impact of descriptive and injunctive norms on engagement in mobile phone use while driving in young drivers: A systematic review.描述性规范和指令性规范对年轻驾驶员开车时使用手机行为的影响:系统评价。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;175:106774. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106774. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
10
Mobile phone conversation distraction: Understanding differences in impact between simulator and naturalistic driving studies.手机通话分神:理解模拟器和自然驾驶研究中影响的差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Surfing in the streets: How problematic smartphone use, fear of missing out, and antisocial personality traits are linked to driving behavior.街头冲浪:智能手机使用问题、错失恐惧和反社会人格特质与驾驶行为有何关联。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284984. eCollection 2023.
2
Risk perception of COVID-19 and its related factors among centralized medical isolation groups in China.中国集中医学隔离人群中对新型冠状病毒肺炎的风险认知及其相关因素
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1131076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131076. eCollection 2023.
3
Reducing traffic violations in the online food delivery industry-A case study in Xi'an City, China.
减少在线送餐行业的交通违法行为——以中国西安市为例。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;10:974488. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.974488. eCollection 2022.
4
A comparison of characteristics between food delivery riders with and without traffic crash experience during delivery in Malaysia.马来西亚送餐骑手在送餐过程中有无交通事故经历的特征比较。
Case Stud Transp Policy. 2022 Dec;10(4):2244-2250. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving.为何要冒险?探究洪水驾车的社会心理决定因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:913790. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913790. eCollection 2022.
6
Study on Instant Delivery Service Riders' Safety and Health by the Effects of Labour Intensity in China: A Mediation Analysis.中国即时配送服务骑手劳动强度对其安全与健康影响的研究:一项中介分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:907474. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.907474. eCollection 2022.
7
How to Measure the Safety Cognition Capability of Urban Residents? An Assessment Framework Based on Cognitive Progression Theory.如何衡量城市居民的安全认知能力?基于认知发展理论的评估框架。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 12;13:707172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.707172. eCollection 2022.
8
Mobile Phone Use "on the Road": A Self-Report Study on Young Drivers.在路上使用手机:一项关于年轻驾驶员的自我报告研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 16;12:620653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620653. eCollection 2021.