Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104347. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104347. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Conversation is generally characterized by smooth transitions between turns, with only very short gaps. This entails that responders often begin planning their response before the ongoing turn is finished. However, controversy exists about whether they start planning as early as they can, to make sure they respond on time, or as late as possible, to minimize the overlap between comprehension and production planning. Two earlier EEG studies have found neural correlates of response planning (positive ERP and alpha decrease) as soon as listeners could start planning their response, already midway through the current turn. However, in these studies, the questions asked were highly controlled with respect to the position where planning could start (e.g., very early) and required short and easy responses. The present study measured participants' EEG while an experimenter interviewed them in a spontaneous interaction. Coding the questions in the interviews showed that, under these natural circumstances, listeners can, in principle, start planning a response relatively early, on average after only about one third of the question has passed. Furthermore, ERP results showed a large positivity, interpreted before as an early neural signature of response planning, starting about half a second after the start of the word that allowed listeners to start planning a response. A second neural signature of response planning, an alpha decrease, was not replicated as reliably. In conclusion, listeners appear to start planning their response early during the ongoing turn, also under natural circumstances, presumably in order to keep the gap between turns short and respond on time. These results have several important implications for turn-taking theories, which need to explain how interlocutors deal with the overlap between comprehension and production, how they manage to come in on time, and the sources that lead to variability between conversationalists in the start of planning.
对话通常的特点是轮次之间的转换流畅,只有非常短的停顿。这意味着应答者通常在当前轮次结束之前就开始计划他们的回答。然而,关于他们是尽早开始计划,以确保按时回答,还是尽可能晚开始计划,以最小化理解和生产计划之间的重叠,存在争议。两项早期的 EEG 研究发现,应答者可以开始计划他们的反应,即已经在当前轮次的中途,就有响应规划的神经相关物(正的 ERP 和 alpha 减少)。然而,在这些研究中,所提出的问题在规划可以开始的位置(例如,非常早)方面受到高度控制,并且需要简短和容易的回答。本研究在实验者在自然互动中对参与者进行访谈时测量了他们的 EEG。对访谈中的问题进行编码表明,在这些自然情况下,原则上,应答者可以相对较早地开始计划回答,平均在问题过去大约三分之一后。此外,ERP 结果显示出一个大的正性,以前解释为响应规划的早期神经特征,在允许应答者开始计划响应的单词开始后大约半秒开始。作为响应规划的第二个神经特征的 alpha 减少没有被可靠地复制。总之,应答者似乎在当前轮次期间尽早开始计划他们的回答,即使在自然情况下,大概是为了保持轮次之间的间隙较短并按时回答。这些结果对轮流理论有几个重要的影响,轮流理论需要解释说话者如何处理理解和生产之间的重叠,他们如何设法按时参与,以及导致对话者在规划开始时的变异性的来源。