Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;11(2):200-208. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002192. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) became legal in the Australian state of Victoria on 19 June 2019 and will be legal in Western Australia from 2021. Other Australian states are progressing similar law reform processes. In Australia and internationally, doctors are central to the operation of all legal VAD regimes. It is broadly accepted that doctors, as a profession, are less in favour of VAD law reform than the rest of the community. To date, there has been little analysis of the factors that motivate doctors' support or opposition to legalised VAD in Australia.
To review all studies reporting the attitudes of Australian doctors regarding the legalisation of VAD, including their willingness to participate in it, and to observe and record common themes in existing attitudinal data.
Scoping review and thematic analysis of qualitative and quantitative data.
CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PubMed and Informit were searched from inception to June 2019.
26 publications detailing 19 studies were identified. Thematic analysis of quantitative and qualitative findings was performed. Three overarching themes emerged. 'Attitudes towards regulation' encompassed doctors' orientation towards legalisation, the shortcomings of binary categories of support or opposition and doctors' concerns about additional regulation of their professional practices. 'Professional and personal impact of legalisation' described tensions between palliative care and VAD, and the emotional and social impact of being providers of VAD. 'Practical considerations regarding access' considered doctors' concerns about eligibility criteria and their willingness to provide VAD.
A detailed understanding of medical perspectives about VAD would facilitate the design of legislative models that take better account of doctors' concerns. This may facilitate their greater participation in VAD and help address potential access issues arising from availability of willing doctors.
2019 年 6 月 19 日,自愿协助死亡(VAD)在澳大利亚维多利亚州合法化,并将于 2021 年在西澳大利亚州合法化。其他澳大利亚州正在推进类似的法律改革进程。在澳大利亚和国际上,医生是所有合法 VAD 制度运作的核心。人们普遍认为,医生作为一个职业,比社区其他成员更不赞成 VAD 法律改革。迄今为止,对于澳大利亚医生支持或反对合法 VAD 的因素,几乎没有分析。
审查所有报告澳大利亚医生对 VAD 合法化态度的研究,包括他们参与 VAD 的意愿,并观察和记录现有态度数据中的常见主题。
对定性和定量数据进行范围审查和主题分析。
从成立到 2019 年 6 月,在 CINAHL、Embase、Scopus、PubMed 和 Informit 上进行了搜索。
确定了 26 篇详细描述了 19 项研究的出版物。对定量和定性发现进行了主题分析。出现了三个总体主题。“对监管的态度”包括医生对合法化的定位、对支持或反对的二分法类别的缺点以及对其专业实践的额外监管的担忧。“合法化的专业和个人影响”描述了姑息治疗和 VAD 之间的紧张关系,以及作为 VAD 提供者的情感和社会影响。“关于准入的实际考虑”考虑了医生对资格标准的担忧及其提供 VAD 的意愿。
详细了解医生对 VAD 的看法将有助于设计更好地考虑医生关注的立法模式。这可能会促进他们更多地参与 VAD,并有助于解决由于愿意提供 VAD 的医生的可用性而产生的潜在准入问题。