• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do mental or somatic diagnoses influence emotional response and perception of physician-assisted suicide in Germany? A vignette-based experiment.在德国,精神或躯体诊断会影响对医生协助自杀的情绪反应和认知吗?一项基于 vignette 的实验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 15;26(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01223-3.
2
What do suicide loss survivors think of physician-assisted suicide: a comparative analysis of suicide loss survivors and the general population in Germany.自杀死亡幸存者对医师协助自杀的看法:德国自杀死亡幸存者与一般人群的对比分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 19;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01099-9.
3
Stability of attitudes regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia among oncology patients, physicians, and the general public.肿瘤患者、医生和普通公众对医生协助自杀和安乐死态度的稳定性。
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1274. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1274.
4
Requests for physician-assisted suicide in German general practice: frequency, content, and motives- a qualitative analysis of GPs' experiences.德国全科医疗中医生协助自杀的请求:频率、内容及动机——对全科医生经历的定性分析
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 23;26(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02830-0.
5
Physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia and palliative sedation: attitudes and knowledge of medical students.医生协助自杀、安乐死与姑息性镇静:医学生的态度与知识
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 15;33(1):Doc11. doi: 10.3205/zma001010. eCollection 2016.
6
[Attitudes and experiences regarding physician assisted suicide : A survey among members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine].[关于医生协助自杀的态度和经历:对德国姑息医学协会成员的一项调查]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Jan;60(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2476-7.
7
Euthanasia and assisted suicide in the context of psychiatric disorders: sharing experiences from the Low Countries.精神障碍患者的安乐死和协助自杀:分享来自低地国家的经验。
Psychiatr Pol. 2020 Aug 31;54(4):661-672. doi: 10.12740/PP/124078.
8
Perspectives on physician-assisted suicide in mental healthcare: results of a survey of physicians and medical students.精神卫生保健领域中医生协助自杀的观点:医生和医学生调查结果
BJPsych Open. 2024 Aug 7;10(5):e141. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.731.
9
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective.医生协助自杀与安乐死:全球视角下的新问题
J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct;33(4):197-203. doi: 10.1177/0825859718777325. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
[Physician-assisted suicide and advance care planning--ethical considerations on the autonomy of dementia patients at their end of life].[医生协助自杀与预先护理计划——关于痴呆症患者临终时自主权的伦理考量]
Psychiatr Prax. 2014 Oct;41(7):385-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370206. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
What do suicide loss survivors think of physician-assisted suicide: a comparative analysis of suicide loss survivors and the general population in Germany.自杀死亡幸存者对医师协助自杀的看法:德国自杀死亡幸存者与一般人群的对比分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 19;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01099-9.
2
Physician assisted-dying in mentally and somatically ill individuals in Switzerland: Protocol for survey-based study.瑞士身心疾病患者的医生协助死亡:基于调查的研究方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 28;13:987791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.987791. eCollection 2022.
3
Free will and the desire for suicide in mental illness.精神疾病中的自由意志与自杀意愿
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 15;13:909970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.909970. eCollection 2022.
4
Practical Issues of Medical Experts in Assessing Persons With Mental Illness Asking for Assisted Dying in Switzerland.瑞士医学专家在评估寻求协助死亡的精神疾病患者时面临的实际问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 7;13:909194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.909194. eCollection 2022.
5
Suffering is not enough: Assisted dying for people with mental illness.仅仅承受痛苦还不够:为有精神疾病的人提供协助性死亡。
Bioethics. 2022 Jun;36(5):519-524. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13002. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software.使用 G*Power 软件进行样本量确定和功效分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Does voluntary assisted dying cause public stigma for the bereaved? A vignette-based experiment.自愿协助死亡会给逝者家属带来公众污名吗?一项基于 vignette 的实验。
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Oct;19(5):558-562. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520001352.
8
Old and Depressed? What We Think About Ending Their Suffering-Attitudes Toward Euthanasia for Elderly Suffering From Physical Versus Mental Illness.年老且抑郁?我们对结束他们的痛苦的看法——对患有躯体疾病与精神疾病的老年患者实施安乐死的态度。
Omega (Westport). 2022 Sep;85(4):1026-1041. doi: 10.1177/0030222820961241. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Physician attitudes to voluntary assisted dying: a scoping review.医生对自愿协助死亡的态度:范围综述。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;11(2):200-208. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002192. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
A systematic review of older adults' request for or attitude toward euthanasia or assisted-suicide.老年人对安乐死或协助自杀的请求或态度的系统评价。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Mar;25(3):420-430. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1697201. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

在德国,精神或躯体诊断会影响对医生协助自杀的情绪反应和认知吗?一项基于 vignette 的实验。

Do mental or somatic diagnoses influence emotional response and perception of physician-assisted suicide in Germany? A vignette-based experiment.

作者信息

Hofmann Laura, Wagner Birgit

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 15;26(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01223-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-025-01223-3
PMID:40375287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12079990/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is increasingly being legalized in a growing number of countries and is the focus of societal and ethical debates. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the perception and acceptance of PAS across different physical and mental health conditions. This study aimed to explore emotional responses, understanding, and willingness to support individuals with the wish for PAS.

METHODS

Participants from the general German population (N = 512) were presented with four case vignettes of PAS depicting individuals in an online study: one with cancer, one with depression, one with schizophrenia, and one healthy individual. Participants were asked to evaluate the emotional reactions elicited by the desire for PAS, the extent of their understanding of this wish, and their willingness to support each individual.

RESULTS

The study revealed significant differences in reactions to the case vignettes. Pro-social emotions were lowest and anger highest when considering the healthy individual. Participants demonstrated the greatest understanding and highest willingness to support the individual with cancer, while the least understanding and support were observed for the healthy person.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential levels of support for PAS across various conditions underscore the complex interplay between societal values, perceived quality of life, and ethical considerations, particularly when mental health is involved.

摘要

背景

医生协助自杀(PAS)在越来越多的国家日益合法化,并且是社会和伦理辩论的焦点。然而,对于不同身心健康状况下人们对PAS的认知和接受程度,了解有限。本研究旨在探讨情感反应、理解以及支持有PAS意愿个体的意愿。

方法

在一项在线研究中,向来自德国普通人群的参与者(N = 512)展示了四个PAS案例 vignettes,描绘了个体情况:一个患有癌症,一个患有抑郁症,一个患有精神分裂症,还有一个健康个体。要求参与者评估PAS愿望引发的情感反应、他们对这一愿望的理解程度以及支持每个个体的意愿。

结果

该研究揭示了对案例 vignettes 的反应存在显著差异。在考虑健康个体时,亲社会情感最低,愤怒最高。参与者对患有癌症的个体表现出最大的理解和最高的支持意愿,而对健康个体的理解和支持最少。

结论

在各种情况下对PAS的支持水平存在差异,这凸显了社会价值观、感知生活质量和伦理考量之间的复杂相互作用,尤其是涉及心理健康时。