Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2697-e2704. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa802.
Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, immune-related adverse events and the risk of infections are not well studied. To assess the infectious risk of CPIs, we evaluated the incidence of infections in lung cancer patients treated with CPIs plus conventional chemotherapy (CC) vs CC alone.
We performed a retrospective comparative study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received CPIs combined with CC and those treated with CC alone at our institution during January 2016 to February 2019. We compared clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes including infection rate and mortality between the groups.
We identified 123 patients for the CPI group and 147 patients for the control (CC) group. Eighteen patients (15%) in the CPI group and 33 patients (22%) in the control group developed infections (P = .1). Pneumonia was the most common infection encountered in both groups. Urinary tract infection was higher in the CC group (40%) than in the CPI group (9%) (P = .01). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .024), prior use of corticosteroids (P = .021), and neutropenia (P < .001) were independent risk factors for infection and severe infection requiring hospital admission. Chronic kidney disease (P = .02), prior cancer treatment (P = .023), and neutropenia (P < .0001) were identified as independent risk factors for all-cause mortality.
Lung cancer patients treated with CPIs combined with CC have a comparable risk of infection to those treated with CC alone, although there is a trend towards fewer infections in those given CPIs, particularly when it comes to urinary tract infections.
检查点抑制剂(CPI)免疫疗法彻底改变了癌症治疗。然而,免疫相关不良反应和感染风险尚未得到充分研究。为了评估 CPI 的感染风险,我们评估了在我们机构接受 CPI 联合常规化疗(CC)与单独 CC 治疗的肺癌患者的感染发生率。
我们对 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月期间在我们机构接受 CPI 联合 CC 治疗和单独 CC 治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者进行了回顾性比较研究。我们比较了两组患者的临床特征、治疗和结局,包括感染率和死亡率。
我们确定了 123 例 CPI 组患者和 147 例对照组(CC)患者。CPI 组有 18 例(15%)患者和对照组有 33 例(22%)患者发生感染(P=0.1)。两组最常见的感染均为肺炎。CC 组的尿路感染发生率(40%)高于 CPI 组(9%)(P=0.01)。多变量分析显示,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(P=0.024)、既往使用皮质类固醇(P=0.021)和中性粒细胞减少症(P<0.001)是感染和需要住院治疗的严重感染的独立危险因素。慢性肾脏病(P=0.02)、既往癌症治疗(P=0.023)和中性粒细胞减少症(P<0.0001)是全因死亡率的独立危险因素。
接受 CPI 联合 CC 治疗的肺癌患者感染风险与单独接受 CC 治疗的患者相当,尽管接受 CPI 治疗的患者感染风险呈下降趋势,特别是尿路感染风险。