• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚有和无嗓音疲劳的大学教授的嗓音声学参数差异。

Differences on Voice Acoustic Parameters between Colombian College Professors with and without Vocal Fatigue.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Speech and Language Pathology Program, Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Bogotá, Colombia.

Department of Engineering, Biomedical Engineering Program, Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

J Voice. 2022 Mar;36(2):219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.008
PMID:32564941
Abstract

AIM

To determine which acoustic parameters may be associated with vocal fatigue among college professors in Bogotá-Colombia.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study including 27 voice samples of college professors.

RESULTS

A gender analysis showed that mean fundamental frequency increased significantly among men and women who reported vocal fatigue compared with the those without fatigue (138.2Hz vs 122.3Hz for males; and 228.7Hz vs 188.9Hz for females; Mann-Whitney U test P value <0.01). Participants with vocal fatigue demonstrated a significantly decreased standard deviation of vocal sound pressure level compared to participants without vocal fatigue (8.7 dB vs 10.2 dB; Mann-Whitney U test P value <0.01). For the males in our sample, fundamental frequency had fair discriminatory value for vocal fatigue (area under the curve = 0.7). Sensitivity and specificity were moderate at a cut-off of 125 Hz (0.7 and 0.6 respectively). For females in this sample, the discriminatory value of fundamental frequency was slightly higher (area under the curve = 0.8). At a cut-off of 200 Hz, sensitivity was high (0.9) and specificity were moderate (0.7).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the fundamental frequencies and standard deviations of vocal sound pressure level are good indicators of and may be used to identify college professors with vocal fatigue. Clinically, voice clinicians may aim to train their clients to produce speech with a higher variation of "intensity" in order to avoid vocal fatigue.

摘要

目的

确定在哥伦比亚波哥大的大学教授中,哪些声学参数可能与嗓音疲劳有关。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 27 名大学教授的嗓音样本。

结果

性别分析表明,与无疲劳的教授相比,报告有嗓音疲劳的男性和女性的平均基频显著升高(男性为 138.2Hz 对 122.3Hz;女性为 228.7Hz 对 188.9Hz;Mann-Whitney U 检验 P 值均<0.01)。与无嗓音疲劳的参与者相比,有嗓音疲劳的参与者的嗓音声压级标准差显著降低(8.7dB 对 10.2dB;Mann-Whitney U 检验 P 值均<0.01)。对于我们样本中的男性,基频对嗓音疲劳具有较好的鉴别价值(曲线下面积=0.7)。在 125Hz 的截点下,灵敏度和特异性为中等(分别为 0.7 和 0.6)。在本样本中,女性的基频鉴别值稍高(曲线下面积=0.8)。在 200Hz 的截点下,灵敏度较高(0.9),特异性为中等(0.7)。

结论

总之,基频和嗓音声压级的标准差是识别有嗓音疲劳的大学教授的良好指标,并且可能被用于识别。在临床上,嗓音临床医生可能旨在训练他们的客户使用更高变化的“强度”来产生言语,以避免嗓音疲劳。

相似文献

1
Differences on Voice Acoustic Parameters between Colombian College Professors with and without Vocal Fatigue.哥伦比亚有和无嗓音疲劳的大学教授的嗓音声学参数差异。
J Voice. 2022 Mar;36(2):219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
Vocal Sensory Symptoms, Vocal Fatigue and Vocal Habits in University Professors.大学教授的嗓音感知症状、嗓音疲劳和嗓音习惯。
J Voice. 2024 Mar;38(2):309-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
3
The Effects of Reading Speed on Acoustic Voice Parameters and Self-reported Vocal Fatigue in Students.阅读速度对学生嗓音声学参数和自我报告的嗓音疲劳的影响。
J Voice. 2024 Jan;38(1):243.e1-243.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Speech Adjustments for Room Acoustics and Their Effects on Vocal Effort.针对房间声学的语音调整及其对发声努力的影响。
J Voice. 2017 May;31(3):392.e1-392.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
5
Vocal Acoustics and Aerodynamics During Scripted Reading Compared to Spontaneous Speech.朗读脚本与自然言语时的嗓音声学和空气动力学比较。
J Voice. 2023 Jul;37(4):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.03.022. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
Vocal Fatigue in Prospective Vocal Professionals.前瞻性声乐专业人士的发声疲劳。
J Voice. 2021 Mar;35(2):247-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
7
The Relationship Between Vocal Fatigue Index and Voice Handicap Index in University Professors With and Without Voice Complaint.有嗓音问题和无嗓音问题的大学教授的嗓音疲劳指数与嗓音障碍指数之间的关系
J Voice. 2020 Sep;34(5):809.e1-809.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Vocal Effects in Military Students Submitted to an Intense Recruit Training: A Pilot Study.接受高强度新兵训练的军校学员的嗓音效应:一项初步研究。
J Voice. 2016 Jan;30(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 29.
9
The relationship between vocal fatigue and voice-related quality of life in university professors.高校教师嗓音疲劳与嗓音相关生活质量的关系
Codas. 2021 Jul 23;33(5):e20200174. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202020174. eCollection 2021.
10
Self-referred personal behavior profile of university professors: association with communicative and vocal self-evaluation.大学教授的自我参照个人行为概况:与交际和嗓音自我评估的关联
Codas. 2020 Feb 10;32(2):e20180141. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192018141. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
[Advances in application research on assessment methods of vocal fatigue].[嗓音疲劳评估方法的应用研究进展]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Nov;37(11):934-938. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.11.015.