• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学教授的自我参照个人行为概况:与交际和嗓音自我评估的关联

Self-referred personal behavior profile of university professors: association with communicative and vocal self-evaluation.

作者信息

Tonon Iara Guirão, Gomes Nayara Ribeiro, Teixeira Letícia Caldas, Medeiros Adriane Mesquita de

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2020 Feb 10;32(2):e20180141. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192018141. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20192018141
PMID:32049096
Abstract

PURPOSE

Describe the self-referred personal behavior profiles of university professors and verify the association of these profiles with the self-assessment of communicative aspects and vocal symptoms.

METHODS

Study conducted with 334 professors at a public university who responded to an online questionnaire regarding voice use in teaching practice. Personal behavior profile classification was the response variable, which was divided into four types: pragmatic, analytical, expressive and affable. Explanatory variables were vocal self-perception, vocal resources, and communicative aspects. Descriptive data analysis was performed with application of the Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher's Exact tests.

RESULTS

University professors identified themselves more with the affable and expressive personal behavior profiles. Overall, professors presented good self-perception about vocal and communicative aspects, in addition to having reported few vocal symptoms. Profiles differed for some of the assessed variables, namely, pragmatic professors reported high speech velocity and sporadic eye contact; expressive professors demonstrated self-perception about their voice and strong voice intensity; those in the analytical profile self-reported negative perception about vocal quality, weak voice intensity, poor articulation and rapid speaking rate; the other professors mostly reported voice tiredness symptoms and difficulty projecting the voice.

CONCLUSION

University professors identify themselves mostly with the affable and expressive profiles. Self-perception analysis of the personal behavior profile in university professors showed the influence of self-reported personality characteristics on communicative skills in the classroom.

摘要

目的

描述大学教授自我提及的个人行为特征,并验证这些特征与沟通方面的自我评估及嗓音症状之间的关联。

方法

对一所公立大学的334名教授进行研究,他们通过在线问卷回复了有关教学实践中嗓音使用的情况。个人行为特征分类为应变量,分为四种类型:务实型、分析型、表达型和亲和型。解释变量为嗓音自我认知、嗓音资源和沟通方面。应用Pearson卡方检验和Fisher精确检验进行描述性数据分析。

结果

大学教授更多地将自己归为亲和型和表达型个人行为特征。总体而言,教授们除了报告较少的嗓音症状外,对嗓音和沟通方面有良好的自我认知。在一些评估变量上,不同特征存在差异,即务实型教授报告语速快且眼神接触零散;表达型教授对自己的嗓音有自我认知且嗓音强度大;分析型特征的教授自我报告对嗓音质量的负面认知、嗓音强度弱、发音差和语速快;其他教授大多报告嗓音疲劳症状和声音投射困难。

结论

大学教授大多将自己归为亲和型和表达型特征。对大学教授个人行为特征的自我认知分析表明,自我报告的性格特征对课堂沟通技巧有影响。

相似文献

1
Self-referred personal behavior profile of university professors: association with communicative and vocal self-evaluation.大学教授的自我参照个人行为概况:与交际和嗓音自我评估的关联
Codas. 2020 Feb 10;32(2):e20180141. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192018141. eCollection 2020.
2
Vocal Symptoms in University Professors: Their Association With Vocal Resources and With Work Environment.大学教授的嗓音症状:与嗓音资源和工作环境的关系。
J Voice. 2020 May;34(3):352-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
3
Vocal Sensory Symptoms, Vocal Fatigue and Vocal Habits in University Professors.大学教授的嗓音感知症状、嗓音疲劳和嗓音习惯。
J Voice. 2024 Mar;38(2):309-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
4
The relationship between vocal fatigue and voice-related quality of life in university professors.高校教师嗓音疲劳与嗓音相关生活质量的关系
Codas. 2021 Jul 23;33(5):e20200174. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202020174. eCollection 2021.
5
The Relationship Between Vocal Fatigue Index and Voice Handicap Index in University Professors With and Without Voice Complaint.有嗓音问题和无嗓音问题的大学教授的嗓音疲劳指数与嗓音障碍指数之间的关系
J Voice. 2020 Sep;34(5):809.e1-809.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.教师对嗓音质量的认知与专业人士的认知比较。
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):763.e17-763.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
7
Vocal tract discomfort in teachers: its relationship to self-reported voice disorders.教师的声道不适:与自我报告的声音障碍的关系。
J Voice. 2013 Jul;27(4):473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
8
Perceptions of Voice Teachers Regarding Students' Vocal Behaviors During Singing and Speaking.声乐教师对学生唱歌和说话时发声行为的看法。
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):111.e19-111.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
9
Vocal quality in university teachers: a pilot study.大学教师的嗓音质量:一项初步研究。
B-ENT. 2009;5(2):101-9.
10
Vocal Aspects of Brazilian Evangelical Pastors.巴西福音派牧师的嗓音特点。
J Voice. 2018 Nov;32(6):689-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping of the characteristics in the CoDAS journal publications in the voice area: a scoping review.嗓音领域 CoDAS 期刊出版物特征映射:范围综述。
Codas. 2023 Jun 5;35(3):e20220088. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022088pt. eCollection 2023.