Suppr超能文献

胸膜标志物对结核性胸腔积液的诊断价值。

The diagnostic utility of pleural markers for tuberculosis pleural effusion.

作者信息

Zhang Man, Li Dan, Hu Zhi-De, Huang Yuan-Lan

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China.

Department of Special Food and Equipment, Naval Special Medical Center, The Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 May;8(9):607. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.110.

Abstract

Tuberculosis pleural effusion (TPE) is common in clinical practice, and its diagnosis remains a challenge for clinicians. Ziehl-Neelsen staining, PE Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, and biopsy are the gold standards for TPE diagnosis; however, they are time-consuming, invasive, observer-dependent, and insensitive. PE markers represent a rapid, low-cost, and non-invasive objective diagnostic tool for TPE. In the past decades, several PE biomarkers have been developed, and their diagnostic accuracy has been evaluated in many studies. Here, we reviewed the literature to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers, especially using the evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis. The current research strongly suggests that adenosine deaminase (ADA), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and interleukin 27 (IL-27) have extremely higher diagnostic accuracy for TPE, while the diagnostic accuracy of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ-induced protein 10 kDa (IP-10) is moderate. Although some evidence supports C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), CXCL11, CXCL12, sFas ligand, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), calpain-1, spectrin breakdown products (SBDP), matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), soluble CD26 (sCD26), soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) as useful diagnostic markers for TPE, more support is needed to validate their diagnostic accuracy. Finally, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have extremely high diagnostic specificity, but their sensitivity is low. Taken together, ADA is the preferred marker for TPE because its low cost and suitability for standardization.

摘要

结核性胸腔积液(TPE)在临床实践中很常见,其诊断对临床医生来说仍然是一项挑战。萋-尼染色、胸腔积液结核分枝杆菌培养和活检是TPE诊断的金标准;然而,它们耗时、具有侵入性、依赖观察者且不敏感。胸腔积液标志物是一种用于TPE的快速、低成本且非侵入性的客观诊断工具。在过去几十年中,已经开发了几种胸腔积液生物标志物,并且在许多研究中评估了它们的诊断准确性。在此,我们回顾了文献以总结这些生物标志物的诊断准确性,特别是使用系统评价和荟萃分析的证据。当前研究强烈表明,腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)和白细胞介素27(IL-27)对TPE具有极高的诊断准确性,而干扰素γ释放试验(IGRAs)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和干扰素-γ诱导蛋白10 kDa(IP-10)的诊断准确性中等。尽管一些证据支持C-X-C基序趋化因子配体9(CXCL9)、CXCL11、CXCL12、可溶性Fas配体、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)、钙蛋白酶-1、血影蛋白降解产物(SBDP)、基质金属蛋白酶-1(MMP-1)、可溶性CD26(sCD26)、可溶性白细胞介素2受体(sIL-2R)作为TPE的有用诊断标志物,但需要更多支持来验证它们的诊断准确性。最后,核酸扩增试验(NAATs)具有极高的诊断特异性,但其敏感性较低。综上所述,ADA是TPE的首选标志物,因为其成本低且适合标准化。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Corticosteroids in Patients With Pleural and Pericardial Tuberculosis.皮质类固醇在胸膜和心包结核患者中的应用
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2025 Mar 7;15(2):35-47. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1453. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验