• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在记忆诊所对老年人使用眼动追踪技术,以研究轻度认知障碍对EQ-5D-5L健康状态偏好选择的影响。

Using Eye-Tracking Technology with Older People in Memory Clinics to Investigate the Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Choices for EQ-5D-5L Health States Preferences.

作者信息

Wang Kaiying, Barr Chris, Norman Richard, George Stacey, Whitehead Craig, Ratcliffe Julie

机构信息

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):111-121. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00588-3.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-020-00588-3
PMID:32567035
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Population ageing is a phenomenon taking place in almost every global region. Current estimates indicate that 10-20% of older people in developed countries have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with these percentages predicted to rise markedly by 2050.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to apply eye-tracking technology to investigate the information processes adopted by older people with and without MCI in determining preferences for health states in the five-level EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) instrument.

METHODS

Older people (aged ≥ 65 years; including both patients and family carers) attending outpatient memory clinics in Southern Adelaide between July 2017 and June 2018, competent to read and converse in English and with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) cognition score of ≥ 19 were invited to participate. In total, 52 people met the inclusion criteria, of whom 20 (38%) provided informed consent and fully participated. Participants were categorised into two subgroups (each n = 10) for comparison based upon established MMSE cognition thresholds (19-23, lower MMSE indicative of MCI; ≥ 24, higher MMSE indicative of good cognition). A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) comprising a series of pairwise choices between alternative EQ-5D-5L health states of varying survival duration with differential levels of task complexity (approximated by the degree of attribute level overlap in each choice), was administered as a face-to-face interview with the participant wearing an eye-tracking device.

RESULTS

Attribute non-attendance (ANA) was higher for the lower MMSE subgroup than for the higher MMSE subgroup, although these differences were generally not statistically significant. ANA remained relatively low and consistent for participants with good cognition regardless of task complexity. In contrast, ANA increased notably in participants exhibiting MCI, increasing from 10% on average per participant in the lower MMSE subgroup with five attribute level overlap to 23% on average per participant in the lower MMSE subgroup with zero attribute level overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study provided important insights into the information processes adopted by older people with varying levels of cognitive functioning when choosing between alternative EQ-5D-5L health states of varying survival duration and specifically the relationships between cognitive capacity, task complexity and the extent of ANA. Recent advances in econometric modelling of health state valuation data have demonstrated the added value of capturing ANA information as this can be accounted for in the DCE data analysis, thereby improving the precision of model estimates. Eye-tracking technology can usefully inform the design, conduct and econometric modelling of DCEs, driving the inclusion of this rapidly growing population traditionally excluded from preference-elicitation studies of this nature.

摘要

背景

人口老龄化是几乎在全球每个地区都在发生的一种现象。目前的估计表明,发达国家10% - 20%的老年人患有轻度认知障碍(MCI),预计到2050年这些比例将显著上升。

目的

我们的目的是应用眼动追踪技术,研究患有和未患有MCI的老年人在确定五级欧洲五维健康量表(EQ - 5D - 5L)工具中健康状态偏好时所采用的信息处理过程。

方法

邀请2017年7月至2018年6月期间在阿德莱德南部门诊记忆诊所就诊的老年人(年龄≥65岁;包括患者和家庭护理人员)参与研究,这些老年人能够用英语阅读和交流,且简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)认知得分≥19分。共有52人符合纳入标准,其中20人(38%)提供了知情同意并完全参与了研究。根据既定的MMSE认知阈值(19 - 23,较低的MMSE表明存在MCI;≥24,较高的MMSE表明认知良好)将参与者分为两个亚组(每组n = 1)进行比较。进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE),该实验包括在具有不同生存持续时间和不同任务复杂程度水平(通过每个选择中属性水平重叠程度近似表示)的替代EQ - 5D - L健康状态之间进行一系列成对选择,以面对面访谈的形式进行,参与者佩戴眼动追踪设备。

结果

较低MMSE亚组的属性未关注(ANA)高于较高MMSE亚组,尽管这些差异通常无统计学意义。对于认知良好的参与者,无论任务复杂程度如何,ANA保持相对较低且一致。相比之下,表现出MCI的参与者中ANA显著增加,从属性水平重叠为五时较低MMSE亚组中每位参与者平均10%增加到属性水平重叠为零时较低MMSE亚组中每位参与者平均23%。

结论

这项探索性研究为不同认知功能水平的老年人在选择具有不同生存持续时间的替代EQ - 5D - 5L健康状态时所采用的信息处理过程,特别是认知能力、任务复杂程度和ANA程度之间的关系提供了重要见解。健康状态估值数据的计量经济学建模的最新进展表明,捕捉ANA信息具有附加价值,因为这可以在DCE数据分析中得到考虑,从而提高模型估计的精度。眼动追踪技术可以有效地为DCE的设计、实施和计量经济学建模提供信息,促使将这一迅速增长的人群纳入传统上被排除在这类偏好诱导研究之外的研究中。

相似文献

1
Using Eye-Tracking Technology with Older People in Memory Clinics to Investigate the Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Choices for EQ-5D-5L Health States Preferences.在记忆诊所对老年人使用眼动追踪技术,以研究轻度认知障碍对EQ-5D-5L健康状态偏好选择的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):111-121. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00588-3.
2
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Feasibility of self-reported health related quality of life assessment with older people in residential care: insights from the application of eye tracking technology.利用眼动追踪技术评估养老院老年人自报健康相关生活质量的可行性:应用见解。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3557-3569. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03488-w. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
An Exploration on Attribute Non-attendance Using Discrete Choice Experiment Data from the Irish EQ-5D-5L National Valuation Study.利用爱尔兰EQ-5D-5L国家估值研究的离散选择实验数据对属性未出现情况的探索
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Jun;5(2):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00244-5. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.EQ-5D 价目表重新评估的预备研究:方法报告。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. doi: 10.3310/hta18120.
6
How do older adults receiving aged care services understand and respond to the EQ-5D-5L? A think-aloud study in residential care.在养老院中使用出声思维法研究老年人如何理解和回应 EQ-5D-5L。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3161-3170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03466-2. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
8
A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.一项探索 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态偏好的初步离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):287-98. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0035-z.
9
The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand.泰国的EQ-5D-5L估值研究。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Oct;18(5):551-558. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1494574. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
10
Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.重视健康状况:埃塞俄比亚人的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Sep;22:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475. Epub 2019 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Unravelling the Self-Report Versus Proxy-Report Conundrum for Older Aged Care Residents: Findings from a Mixed-Methods Study.揭示老年护理居民自报与代理报告之间的难题:一项混合方法研究的结果。
Patient. 2024 Jan;17(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00655-6. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
Feasibility of self-reported health related quality of life assessment with older people in residential care: insights from the application of eye tracking technology.

本文引用的文献

1
Opening the 'Black Box': An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys.打开“黑箱”:选择式调查决策过程研究方法概述。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00385-8.
2
Assessing quality of care in nursing homes using discrete choice experiments: How does the level of cognitive functioning impact upon older people's preferences?使用离散选择实验评估养老院的护理质量:认知功能水平如何影响老年人的偏好?
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112466. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112466. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments.
利用眼动追踪技术评估养老院老年人自报健康相关生活质量的可行性:应用见解。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3557-3569. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03488-w. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.离散选择实验在健康状态估值中的应用:进展与新趋势的系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
5
Examining the Association between Polish Migrant Status and Health Preferences Using a Novel Application of a Smaller Design EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.使用较小设计的EQ-5D-5L估值研究的新应用来检验波兰移民身份与健康偏好之间的关联。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 May;6(3):425-435. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00314-2. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
属性水平重叠(和颜色编码)可以降低任务复杂性,提高选择一致性,并降低离散选择实验中的辍学率。
Health Econ. 2019 Mar;28(3):350-363. doi: 10.1002/hec.3846. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
5
What Characteristics of Nursing Homes Are Most Valued by Consumers? A Discrete Choice Experiment with Residents and Family Members.消费者最看重养老院的哪些特点?一项针对居民和家属的离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):843-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
6
The eyes have it: Using eye tracking to inform information processing strategies in multi-attributes choices.眼睛说明了一切:利用眼动追踪为多属性选择中的信息处理策略提供依据。
Health Econ. 2018 Apr;27(4):709-721. doi: 10.1002/hec.3626. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.MCDA 权衡和离散选择实验在患者获益-风险偏好 elicitation 中的应用:批判性评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1483-1491. doi: 10.1002/pds.4255. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.决策启发式还是偏好?离散选择问题中的属性忽视
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-171. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
9
Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study.探索个体如何在离散选择实验中完成选择任务:一项访谈研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Apr 21;16:45. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0140-4.
10
Response Patterns in Health State Valuation Using Endogenous Attribute Attendance and Latent Class Analysis.使用内生属性参与度和潜在类别分析的健康状态估值中的反应模式。
Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25(2):212-24. doi: 10.1002/hec.3134. Epub 2014 Dec 17.