Université de Paris, Center of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS/CRESS/Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.
Midwifery School of Baudelocque, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Pain. 2020 Nov;161(11):2571-2580. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001956.
Besides neuraxial analgesia, nonpharmacological methods are also proposed to help women coping with pain during labor. We aimed to identify the individual and organizational factors associated with the use of nonpharmacological analgesia for labor pain management. Women who attempted vaginal delivery with labor analgesia were selected among participants included in the 2016 National Perinatal Survey, a population-based cross-sectional study. Labor analgesia was studied as neuraxial analgesia alone, nonpharmacological analgesia alone, and neuraxial and nonpharmacological analgesia combined. The associations were studied using multilevel multinomial logistic regression. Among the 9231 women included, 62.4% had neuraxial analgesia alone, 6.4% had nonpharmacological analgesia alone, and 31.2% had both. Nonpharmacological analgesia alone or combined with neuraxial analgesia were both associated with high educational level (adjusted odds ratio 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.23 and 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18-1.63), antenatal preference to deliver without neuraxial analgesia, and public maternity unit status. Nonpharmacological analgesia alone was more frequent among multiparous women, and in maternity units with an anesthesiologist not dedicated to delivery unit (1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.12) and with the lowest midwife workload (2.15; 95% CI, 1.43-3.22). Neuraxial and nonpharmacological analgesia combined was negatively associated with inadequate prenatal care (0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.94). In France, most women who had nonpharmacological analgesia during labor used it as a complementary method to neuraxial analgesia. The use of nonpharmacological analgesia combined with neuraxial analgesia mainly depends on the woman's preference, but also on socioeconomic factors, quality of prenatal care, and care organization.
除了椎管内镇痛,还提出了非药物方法来帮助女性应对分娩时的疼痛。我们旨在确定与分娩疼痛管理中使用非药物镇痛相关的个体和组织因素。这项研究在 2016 年全国围产调查中选择了接受分娩镇痛的阴道分娩产妇,这是一项基于人群的横断面研究。将分娩镇痛分为单独使用椎管内镇痛、单独使用非药物镇痛以及联合使用椎管内和非药物镇痛。使用多水平多项逻辑回归研究相关性。在纳入的 9231 名女性中,62.4%单独使用椎管内镇痛,6.4%单独使用非药物镇痛,31.2%联合使用。单独使用非药物镇痛或联合使用椎管内镇痛均与较高的教育水平(调整后的优势比为 1.55;95%置信区间 [CI],1.08-2.23 和 1.39;95%CI,1.18-1.63)、产前选择不使用椎管内镇痛以及公共产科单位地位相关。单独使用非药物镇痛在多产妇中更为常见,在没有专门从事分娩单位的麻醉师的产科单位(1.57;95%CI,1.16-2.12)和助产士工作量最低的产科单位(2.15;95%CI,1.43-3.22)更为常见。椎管内和非药物镇痛联合与产前保健不足呈负相关(0.70;95%CI,0.53-0.94)。在法国,大多数在分娩时使用非药物镇痛的女性将其作为椎管内镇痛的补充方法。联合使用椎管内和非药物镇痛主要取决于女性的偏好,但也取决于社会经济因素、产前保健质量和护理组织。