Suppr超能文献

失认症患者的多感官意象、记忆和梦境的认知特征。

A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia.

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 22;10(1):10022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7.

Abstract

For most people, visual imagery is an innate feature of many of our internal experiences, and appears to play a critical role in supporting core cognitive processes. Some individuals, however, lack the ability to voluntarily generate visual imagery altogether - a condition termed "aphantasia". Recent research suggests that aphantasia is a condition defined by the absence of visual imagery, rather than a lack of metacognitive awareness of internal visual imagery. Here we further illustrate a cognitive "fingerprint" of aphantasia, demonstrating that compared to control participants with imagery ability, aphantasic individuals report decreased imagery in other sensory domains, although not all report a complete lack of multi-sensory imagery. They also report less vivid and phenomenologically rich autobiographical memories and imagined future scenarios, suggesting a constructive role for visual imagery in representing episodic events. Interestingly, aphantasic individuals report fewer and qualitatively impoverished dreams compared to controls. However, spatial abilities appear unaffected, and aphantasic individuals do not appear to be considerably protected against all forms of trauma symptomatology in response to stressful life events. Collectively, these data suggest that imagery may be a normative representational tool for wider cognitive processes, highlighting the large inter-individual variability that characterises our internal mental representations.

摘要

对于大多数人来说,视觉意象是我们许多内部体验的固有特征,并且似乎在支持核心认知过程中起着关键作用。然而,有些人完全缺乏自愿产生视觉意象的能力——这种情况被称为“空想症”。最近的研究表明,空想症是一种由视觉意象缺失定义的状态,而不是对内部视觉意象的元认知意识缺失。在这里,我们进一步说明了空想症的认知“特征”,表明与具有意象能力的对照组参与者相比,空想症个体报告在其他感觉领域的意象减少,尽管并非所有人都报告完全缺乏多感觉意象。他们还报告说,自传体记忆和想象中的未来场景不那么生动和富有现象学意义,这表明视觉意象在代表情景事件方面具有建设性作用。有趣的是,与对照组相比,空想症个体报告的梦境较少且质量较差。然而,空间能力似乎没有受到影响,而且空想症个体在应对生活压力事件时似乎并没有受到所有形式创伤症状的明显保护。总的来说,这些数据表明,意象可能是更广泛认知过程的规范性代表性工具,突出了我们内部心理表象的个体间巨大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ef1/7308278/0d60b7a5ccaf/41598_2020_65705_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验