Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brain. 2020 Jul 1;143(7):2281-2294. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa155.
Alzheimer's disease can present clinically with either the typical amnestic phenotype or with atypical phenotypes, such as logopenic progressive aphasia and posterior cortical atrophy. We have recently described longitudinal patterns of flortaucipir PET uptake and grey matter atrophy in the atypical phenotypes, demonstrating a longitudinal regional disconnect between flortaucipir accumulation and brain atrophy. However, it is unclear how these longitudinal patterns differ from typical Alzheimer's disease, to what degree flortaucipir and atrophy mirror clinical phenotype in Alzheimer's disease, and whether optimal longitudinal neuroimaging biomarkers would also differ across phenotypes. We aimed to address these unknowns using a cohort of 57 participants diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (18 with typical amnestic Alzheimer's disease, 17 with posterior cortical atrophy and 22 with logopenic progressive aphasia) that had undergone baseline and 1-year follow-up MRI and flortaucipir PET. Typical Alzheimer's disease participants were selected to be over 65 years old at baseline scan, while no age criterion was used for atypical Alzheimer's disease participants. Region and voxel-level rates of tau accumulation and atrophy were assessed relative to 49 cognitively unimpaired individuals and among phenotypes. Principal component analysis was implemented to describe variability in baseline tau uptake and rates of accumulation and baseline grey matter volumes and rates of atrophy across phenotypes. The capability of the principal components to discriminate between phenotypes was assessed with logistic regression. The topography of longitudinal tau accumulation and atrophy differed across phenotypes, with key regions of tau accumulation in the frontal and temporal lobes for all phenotypes and key regions of atrophy in the occipitotemporal regions for posterior cortical atrophy, left temporal lobe for logopenic progressive aphasia and medial and lateral temporal lobe for typical Alzheimer's disease. Principal component analysis identified patterns of variation in baseline and longitudinal measures of tau uptake and volume that were significantly different across phenotypes. Baseline tau uptake mapped better onto clinical phenotype than longitudinal tau and MRI measures. Our study suggests that optimal longitudinal neuroimaging biomarkers for future clinical treatment trials in Alzheimer's disease are different for MRI and tau-PET and may differ across phenotypes, particularly for MRI. Baseline tau tracer retention showed the highest fidelity to clinical phenotype, supporting the important causal role of tau as a driver of clinical dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.
阿尔茨海默病在临床上可表现为典型的遗忘型表型,也可表现为非典型表型,如失语法性进行性失语症和后部皮质萎缩。我们最近描述了非典型表型中氟[18F]氟脱氧酪氨酸(flortaucipir)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)摄取和灰质萎缩的纵向模式,证明了氟[18F]氟脱氧酪氨酸蓄积与脑萎缩之间的纵向区域性脱节。然而,目前尚不清楚这些纵向模式与典型阿尔茨海默病的区别,氟[18F]氟脱氧酪氨酸和萎缩在多大程度上反映了阿尔茨海默病的临床表型,以及是否不同表型的最佳纵向神经影像学生物标志物也会有所不同。我们旨在使用一组 57 名被诊断为阿尔茨海默病的参与者(18 名患有典型遗忘型阿尔茨海默病,17 名患有后部皮质萎缩,22 名患有失语法性进行性失语症)来解决这些未知问题,这些参与者接受了基线和 1 年的随访 MRI 和氟[18F]氟脱氧酪氨酸 PET。典型阿尔茨海默病患者的基线扫描年龄超过 65 岁,而非典型阿尔茨海默病患者则没有年龄标准。在认知正常的 49 名个体中评估了相对于表型的 tau 积聚和萎缩的区域和体素水平率。实施主成分分析以描述不同表型之间基线 tau 摄取和积累率以及基线灰质体积和萎缩率的变化。使用逻辑回归评估主成分区分表型的能力。纵向 tau 积聚和萎缩的分布在不同表型之间存在差异,所有表型的额颞叶为 tau 积聚的关键区域,后部皮质萎缩的枕颞叶、失语法性进行性失语症的左颞叶和典型阿尔茨海默病的内侧和外侧颞叶为萎缩的关键区域。主成分分析确定了基线和纵向 tau 摄取和体积测量值的变化模式,这些模式在不同表型之间存在显著差异。基线 tau 摄取比纵向 tau 和 MRI 测量更能映射到临床表型。我们的研究表明,未来阿尔茨海默病临床治疗试验中最佳的纵向神经影像学生物标志物在 MRI 和 tau-PET 上不同,并且可能因表型而异,尤其是 MRI。基线 tau 示踪剂保留与临床表型的相关性最高,支持 tau 作为阿尔茨海默病临床功能障碍驱动因素的重要因果作用。