Kaufmann Tara L, Rendle Katharine A, Aakhus Erin, Nimgaonkar Vivek, Shah Arnav, Bilger Andrea, Gabriel Peter E, Trotta Rebecca, Braun Jennifer, Shulman Lawrence N, Bekelman Justin E, Barg Frances K
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation at the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Nov;16(11):e1291-e1303. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00013. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
New oncology care delivery models that avoid preventable acute care are needed, yet it is unclear which interventions best meet the needs of patients and caregivers. Perspectives from patients who experienced unplanned acute care events may inform the successful development and implementation of care delivery models.
We performed a qualitative interview study of patients with solid tumors on active treatment who experienced the following 3 types of unplanned acute care events: emergency department visits, first hospitalizations, and multiple hospitalizations. Patients were prospectively recruited within a large academic health system from August 2018 to January 2019. Interviews followed a semi-structured guide developed from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The constant comparative approach was used to identify themes.
Forty-nine patients were interviewed; 51% were men, 75% were non-Hispanic White, and the mean age was 57.4 years (standard deviation, 1.9 years). Fifty-five percent of patients had metastatic disease, and 33% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3-4. We identified the following key themes: drivers of the decision to seek acute care, patients' emotional concerns that influence interactions with the oncology team, and strategies used to avoid acute care. Patients' recommendations for interventions included anticipatory guidance, peer support, improved triage methods, and enhanced symptom management. Patients preferred options for virtual and home-based outpatient care.
Patient-centered care models should focus on early delivery of supportive interventions that help patients and caregivers navigate the unexpected issues that come with cancer treatment. Patients advocate for proactive, multidisciplinary supportive interventions that enable home-based care and are led by the primary oncology team.
需要新的肿瘤护理提供模式来避免可预防的急性护理,但尚不清楚哪些干预措施最能满足患者和护理人员的需求。经历过计划外急性护理事件的患者的观点可能会为护理提供模式的成功开发和实施提供参考。
我们对正在接受积极治疗的实体瘤患者进行了一项定性访谈研究,这些患者经历了以下3种类型的计划外急性护理事件:急诊就诊、首次住院和多次住院。2018年8月至2019年1月在一个大型学术健康系统中前瞻性招募患者。访谈遵循从实施研究综合框架中制定的半结构化指南。采用持续比较法确定主题。
共访谈了49名患者;51%为男性,75%为非西班牙裔白人,平均年龄为57.4岁(标准差1.9岁)。55%的患者患有转移性疾病,33%的东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为3 - 4级。我们确定了以下关键主题:寻求急性护理决策的驱动因素、影响与肿瘤团队互动的患者情感问题以及避免急性护理的策略。患者对干预措施的建议包括预期指导、同伴支持、改进分诊方法和加强症状管理。患者更喜欢虚拟和居家门诊护理选项。
以患者为中心的护理模式应注重早期提供支持性干预措施,帮助患者和护理人员应对癌症治疗中出现的意外问题。患者倡导由肿瘤主要治疗团队主导的积极、多学科支持性干预措施,以实现居家护理。