Niedermeyer Greta M, Hare Elizabeth, Brunker Leslie K, Berk Richard A, Kelsey Kathleen M, Darling Tracy A, Nord Jess L, Schmidt Kasey K, Otto Cynthia M
Department of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Penn Vet Working Dog Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jun 3;7:292. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00292. eCollection 2020.
The objective of this study was to evaluate 4 pre-exercise hydration strategies (oral water, chicken-flavored water, chicken-flavored oral electrolyte solution, and subcutaneous electrolyte solution) in working dogs conducting rigorous tracking operations in hot and arid conditions. In a randomized cross-over field study, 7 Border Patrol Search, Trauma, and Rescue (BORSTAR) Unit dogs working/training out of Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas were randomly assigned to one of 4 different hydration strategy treatments each day for 4 days of study participation. Dogs were provided hydration treatment prior to running 2 separate one-mile tracks and were offered water while tracking. Body weight, blood, and urine were collected at the beginning of the study day and at the completion of each track. Core body temperatures were recorded using internal temperature sensing capsules. The impact of hydration strategy on change in weight, peak temperature, and serum chemical, hematological, and urinary parameters were analyzed using the COIN procedure in R. Compared to the other 3 hydration strategies, dogs receiving chicken-flavored water had higher blood creatine kinase values at the end of the second track ( = 0.0361). Otherwise, hydration strategy had minimal effects on blood or urine parameters. Total fluid intake was lower with water only compared to the other three hydration strategies. Dogs developed elevated core body temperatures (median 41°C; 106°F) without signs of heat exhaustion or heat stroke. Alternate hydration strategies increased total fluid intake compared to water alone; however, chicken-flavored water resulted in increased markers of muscle injury suggesting electrolyte-enriched strategies may have an advantage as a hydration strategy. Additionally, electrolyte-enriched fluids before exercise may help these dogs maintain lower peak temperatures.
本研究的目的是评估在炎热干旱条件下执行严格追踪任务的工作犬的4种运动前补水策略(口服水、鸡肉味水、鸡肉味口服电解质溶液和皮下电解质溶液)。在一项随机交叉野外研究中,来自得克萨斯州埃尔帕索布利斯堡的7只边境巡逻搜索、创伤和救援(BORSTAR)部队的工作/训练犬,在为期4天的研究参与中,每天被随机分配到4种不同补水策略治疗中的一种。在犬跑两条单独的一英里跑道之前给予补水治疗,并在追踪过程中提供水。在研究日开始时和每条跑道跑完后采集体重、血液和尿液。使用内部温度传感胶囊记录核心体温。使用R语言中的COIN程序分析补水策略对体重变化、峰值温度以及血清化学、血液学和尿液参数的影响。与其他3种补水策略相比,饮用鸡肉味水的犬在第二条跑道结束时血液肌酸激酶值更高( = 0.0361)。否则,补水策略对血液或尿液参数影响极小。与其他三种补水策略相比,仅饮水时总液体摄入量较低。犬的核心体温升高(中位数41°C;106°F),但没有热衰竭或中暑迹象。与单独饮水相比,替代补水策略增加了总液体摄入量;然而,鸡肉味水导致肌肉损伤标志物增加,这表明富含电解质的策略作为一种补水策略可能具有优势。此外,运动前饮用富含电解质的液体可能有助于这些犬维持较低的峰值温度。