Otto Cynthia M, Hare Elizabeth, Nord Jess L, Palermo Shannon M, Kelsey Kathleen M, Darling Tracy A, Schmidt Kasey, Coleman Destiny
Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Penn Vet Working Dog Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Oct 26;4:174. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00174. eCollection 2017.
Physical activity in hot environments can increase the risk of heat stress or heat stroke in dogs. Heat tolerance is influenced by acclimatization to the environment, physical fitness, and hydration state. Three common strategies to promote hydration in working dogs are free access to water (W), oral electrolyte solutions (OESs), and administration of subcutaneous fluids (SQs). None of these methods have been compared for safety or efficacy in a working environment. In a cross-over design, seven vehicle-screening canines were randomly assigned to each of the three hydration strategies during working shifts at the Sarita, TX checkpoint. Physical, behavioral, and biochemical parameters were collected before, during, and after a work shift (mean 5.7 ± 0.8 h). Dogs were given 10 mL/kg oral W, 10 mL/kg chicken flavored OES, or 15 mL/kg of SQs initially followed by controlled access to W or OES. The dogs drank 15.61 ± 4.47 mL/kg/h of W and OES when in the OES group, compared to 7.04 ± 3.42 and 5.56 ± 4.40 mL of W, for the W and SQ groups, respectively. The median environmental temperature was 84.8°F (29.3°C). The median humidity was 70%. Based on mixed effects linear modeling, dogs in the OES and SQ groups had significantly higher total CO, and lower packed cell volume and total plasma protein at the end of the day. Creatinine increased a small but significant amount in the SQ group and decreased in the OES group. Searching behaviors were independent of hydration strategy but highly related to the dog specific factors of sex, breed, and activity level. Under conditions of controlled activity in moderate heat and humidity, dogs accustomed to the work and the environment were more likely to increase fluid consumption and hydration when provided a flavored OES. Potential benefits of OES and SQ were indirect and no adverse effects were documented for any of the hydration strategies tested.
在炎热环境中进行身体活动会增加犬类中暑或热射病的风险。耐热性受环境适应、身体素质和水合状态的影响。促进工作犬水合作用的三种常见策略是自由饮水(W)、口服电解质溶液(OES)和皮下补液(SQ)。在工作环境中,尚未对这些方法的安全性或有效性进行比较。在交叉设计中,七只用于车辆筛查的犬在德克萨斯州萨里塔检查站的工作班次期间被随机分配到三种水合策略中的每一种。在工作班次之前、期间和之后收集身体、行为和生化参数(平均5.7±0.8小时)。最初给犬口服10 mL/kg的水、10 mL/kg鸡肉味的OES或15 mL/kg的SQ,随后控制其饮用W或OES。OES组的犬饮用W和OES时每小时每千克体重饮用15.61±4.47 mL,而W组和SQ组分别饮用7.04±3.42 mL和5.56±4.40 mL的W。环境温度中位数为84.8°F(29.3°C)。湿度中位数为70%。基于混合效应线性模型,OES组和SQ组的犬在一天结束时总二氧化碳显著升高,红细胞压积和总血浆蛋白降低。SQ组肌酐有少量但显著增加,OES组肌酐降低。搜寻行为与水合策略无关,但与犬的性别、品种和活动水平等特定因素高度相关。在中度炎热和潮湿的可控活动条件下,习惯工作和环境的犬在提供调味OES时更有可能增加液体摄入量和水合作用。OES和SQ的潜在益处是间接的,且未记录到任何测试水合策略的不良反应。