Suppr超能文献

运用失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)制定初始计划检查表,提高放射治疗安全性。

Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Aug;21(8):83-91. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12918. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To apply failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to generate an effective and efficient initial physics plan checklist.

METHODS

A team of physicists, dosimetrists, and therapists was setup to reconstruct the workflow processes involved in the generation of a treatment plan beginning from simulation. The team then identified possible failure modes in each of the processes. For each failure mode, the severity (S), frequency of occurrence (O), and the probability of detection (D) was assigned a value and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated. The values assigned were based on TG 100. Prior to assigning a value, the team discussed the values in the scoring system to minimize randomness in scoring. A local database of errors was used to help guide the scoring of frequency.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven process steps and 50 possible failure modes were identified starting from simulation to the final approved plan ready for treatment at the machine. Any failure mode that scored an average RPN value of 20 or greater was deemed "eligible" to be placed on the second checklist. In addition, any failure mode with a severity score value of 4 or greater was also considered for inclusion in the checklist. As a by-product of this procedure, safety improvement methods such as automation and standardization of certain processes (e.g., dose constraint checking, check tools), removal of manual transcription of treatment-related information as well as staff education were implemented, although this was not the team's original objective. Prior to the implementation of the new FMEA-based checklist, an in-service for all the second checkers was organized to ensure further standardization of the process.

CONCLUSION

The FMEA proved to be a valuable tool for identifying vulnerabilities in our workflow and processes in generating a treatment plan and subsequently a new, more effective initial plan checklist was created.

摘要

目的

应用失效模式和效果分析(FMEA)生成有效的初始物理计划清单。

方法

成立了一个物理学家、剂量师和治疗师团队,以重建从模拟开始生成治疗计划所涉及的工作流程。然后,团队在每个流程中识别可能的失效模式。对于每种失效模式,严重性(S)、发生频率(O)和检测概率(D)都被赋予一个值,然后计算风险优先数(RPN)。分配的值基于 TG 100。在分配值之前,团队讨论了评分系统中的值,以减少评分的随机性。使用本地错误数据库来帮助指导频率的评分。

结果

从模拟到最终准备在机器上治疗的批准计划,共确定了 27 个流程步骤和 50 种可能的失效模式。任何平均 RPN 值为 20 或更高的失效模式都被认为“符合条件”,可以列入第二个清单。此外,任何严重程度评分为 4 或更高的失效模式也被考虑列入清单。作为该程序的副产品,实施了诸如自动化和某些流程的标准化(例如剂量限制检查、检查工具)、消除与治疗相关信息的手动转录以及员工教育等安全改进方法,尽管这不是团队的原始目标。在实施新的基于 FMEA 的清单之前,为所有第二检查者组织了一次在职培训,以确保进一步标准化该流程。

结论

FMEA 被证明是识别生成治疗计划工作流程和流程中的弱点的有效工具,随后创建了一个新的、更有效的初始计划清单。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc51/7484852/6399ff691fc7/ACM2-21-83-g001.jpg

相似文献

3
A risk assessment of automated treatment planning and recommendations for clinical deployment.
Med Phys. 2019 Jun;46(6):2567-2574. doi: 10.1002/mp.13552. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):152-168. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12205. Epub 2017 Oct 29.
7
Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to Evaluate Risk in the Clinical Adoption of Automated Contouring and Treatment Planning Tools.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul-Aug;12(4):e344-e353. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
10
Evaluating radiotherapy treatment delay using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA).
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Aug;137:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of prospective hazard analysis in radiation therapy.
Med Phys. 2025 Sep;52(9):e18110. doi: 10.1002/mp.18110.
2
Development of a hybrid automated chart checking, data collection, and analysis system.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70161. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70161.
3
Real-time gated proton therapy: Introducing clinical workflow and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 2;34:100311. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100311. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Multicentre prospective risk analysis of a fully automated radiotherapy workflow.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 6;34:100765. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100765. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Improving the safety of radiotherapy treatment processes via incident-driven FMEA feedback loops.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Sep;25(9):e14455. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14455. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
7
Enhancing patient safety in radiotherapy: Implementation of a customized electronic checklist for radiation therapists.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 28;31:100255. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100255. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
ACPSEM position paper: pre-treatment patient specific plan checks and quality assurance in radiation oncology.
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024 Mar;47(1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01367-9. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical Physics Practice Guideline (MPPG) 11.a: Plan and chart review in external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Sep;22(9):4-19. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13366. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275.
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(6):e236-e272. doi: 10.1002/mp.14030. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Failure mode and effects analysis in a paperless radiotherapy department.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Oct;62(5):707-715. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12762. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
5
Outcomes of a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for medication errors in pediatric anesthesia.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jun;27(6):571-580. doi: 10.1111/pan.13136. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
9
Smarter Clinical Checklists: How to Minimize Checklist Fatigue and Maximize Clinician Performance.
Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):570-3. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000352.
10
Medical Physics Practice Guideline 4.a: Development, implementation, use and maintenance of safety checklists.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 May 8;16(3):5431. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5431.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验