• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 期间利用互助、联盟、领导力和倡导的力量。

Leveraging the power of mutual aid, coalitions, leadership, and advocacy during COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Counseling Psychology, University of San Francisco.

Department of Health Professions, University of San Francisco.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2020 Oct;75(7):909-918. doi: 10.1037/amp0000693. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1037/amp0000693
PMID:32584060
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on the norms, patterns, and power structures in the United States that privilege certain groups of people over others. This article describes COVID-19 as an unprecedented catalyst for social transformation that underscores the need for multilevel and cross-sectoral solutions to address systemic changes to improve health equity for all. The authors propose that the American Psychological Association (APA) and its membership can initiate systemic change, in part, by (a) supporting mutual aid organizations that prioritize the needs of vulnerable communities; (b) leveraging the efforts and strides APA psychologists have already made within the association, in the profession, and in policymaking to attend to the health equity and the needs of marginalized communities; (c) building capacity for collaboration between a broad coalition of health associations, health experts, and policymakers to address the physio-psycho-socioeconomic needs of disadvantaged communities; and (d) increasing the APA's participation in the formulation and implementation of an advocacy agenda that prioritizes the physical and psychological health of the communities whose lives are most endangered by COVID-19. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

新冠疫情凸显了美国使某些群体享有特权而牺牲其他群体的规范、模式和权力结构。本文将新冠疫情描述为社会变革的空前催化剂,强调需要多层次和跨部门的解决方案来实现改善所有人健康公平的系统性变革。作者提出,美国心理协会(APA)及其成员可以通过以下方式启动系统性变革:(a)支持优先考虑弱势社区需求的互助组织;(b)利用 APA 心理学家在协会内部、专业领域和决策制定中已经做出的努力和进展,关注健康公平和边缘化社区的需求;(c)建立广泛的健康协会、健康专家和政策制定者之间合作的能力,以满足弱势社区的生理心理社会经济需求;(d)增加 APA 参与制定和实施倡导议程的力度,该议程将最受新冠疫情威胁的社区的身心健康放在首位。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Leveraging the power of mutual aid, coalitions, leadership, and advocacy during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间利用互助、联盟、领导力和倡导的力量。
Am Psychol. 2020 Oct;75(7):909-918. doi: 10.1037/amp0000693. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Inequity and the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on communities of color in the United States: The need for a trauma-informed social justice response.美国种族多样性社区的不平等现象和 COVID-19 的不成比例影响:需要创伤知情的社会正义应对。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):443-445. doi: 10.1037/tra0000889. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
3
Raising awareness of disabled lives and health care rationing during the COVID-19 pandemic.提高对 COVID-19 大流行期间残疾生活和医疗保健资源配置的认识。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S210-S211. doi: 10.1037/tra0000673. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Rural-urban mental health disparities in the United States during COVID-19.美国在新冠疫情期间的城乡心理健康差距。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S222-S224. doi: 10.1037/tra0000871. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
The COVID-19 Pandemic: Everything Old Is New Again in Public Health Education.新冠疫情:公共卫生教育中一切旧貌换新颜。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):501-503. doi: 10.1177/1090198120935067. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
Leveraging a public-public partnership in Los Angeles County to address COVID-19 for children, youth, and families in underresourced communities.利用洛杉矶县的公私合作伙伴关系,为资源匮乏社区的儿童、青少年和家庭解决 COVID-19 问题。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):457-460. doi: 10.1037/tra0000880. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Finding purpose.寻找意义。
Fam Syst Health. 2020 Sep;38(3):338-340. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000533.
8
[Left behind populations, COVID-19 and risks of health inequities : a guide of the local social-health network (Vaud, Switzerland)].[留守人群、新冠疫情与健康不平等风险:地方社会健康网络指南(瑞士沃州)]
Rev Med Suisse. 2020 Apr 29;16(N° 691-2):859-862.
9
Leading with inclusion during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stronger together.在 COVID-19 大流行期间以包容引领:团结更有力。
Neurology. 2020 Sep 22;95(12):537-542. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010641. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Disparities, desperation, and divisiveness: Coping with COVID-19 in India.差异、绝望与分裂:印度应对新冠疫情。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Sep;12(6):582-584. doi: 10.1037/tra0000682. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect and mechanism of mutual aid on the subjective well-being of participants under the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情下互助对参与者主观幸福感的影响及机制
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 17;13(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02360-5.
2
Social capital and changes of psychologic distress during early stage of COVID-19 in New orleans.社会资本与新奥尔良 COVID-19 早期阶段心理困扰的变化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 9;14(1):5773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56249-1.
3
Changes in Capacity Building and Sustained Implementation Among a Statewide Coalition to Address Racial/Ethnic COVID-19 Disparities.
全州应对种族/族裔 COVID-19 差异联盟在能力建设和持续实施方面的变化。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jan;114(S1):S59-S64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307470.
4
An Exploratory Study of Healing Circles as a Strategy to Facilitate Resilience in an Undocumented Community.作为促进无证社区恢复力的策略的康复圈探索性研究。
J Lat Psychol. 2023 May;11(2):119-133. doi: 10.1037/lat0000221. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
5
Fear of Reprisal and Change Agency in the Public Health and Social Service System: Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Study.公共卫生与社会服务系统中的报复恐惧与变革机构:一项序列混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 21;12:e48400. doi: 10.2196/48400.
6
Pandemic-Amplified Material Hardship and Community-Led Support among Marshallese Diasporic Communities in the United States.美国马绍尔群岛侨民社区中因疫情加剧的物质困难及社区主导的支持
J Poverty. 2023;27(3):252-267. doi: 10.1080/10875549.2022.2053924. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
'All together now': Facilitators and barriers to engagement in mutual aid during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown.“现在大家一起”:在英国首次 COVID-19 封锁期间参与互助的促进因素和障碍。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0283080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283080. eCollection 2023.
8
Attributes of national governance for an effective response to public health emergencies: Lessons from the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.应对突发公共卫生事件的国家治理特征:从应对 COVID-19 大流行中获得的经验教训。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 6;12:05021. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05021.
9
Who helps and why? A longitudinal exploration of volunteer role identity, between-group closeness, and community identification as predictors of coordinated helping during the COVID-19 pandemic.谁来提供帮助,以及为什么?一项关于志愿者角色认同、群体间亲近度和社区认同作为 COVID-19 大流行期间协调帮助的预测因素的纵向探索。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;61(3):907-923. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12523. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
How do people support each other in emergencies? A qualitative exploration of altruistic and prosocial behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic.人们在紧急情况下如何相互支持?对新冠疫情期间利他行为和亲社会行为的质性探索。
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2021 Dec;21(1):1113-1140. doi: 10.1111/asap.12277. Epub 2021 Oct 24.