Kuru Tolgahan, Mutlu İbrahim
Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 17020 Çanakkale, Türkiye.
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(2):238-245. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.73586. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
This study aims to analyze and compare total deformations with tension band wiring (TBW), intramedullary screw (IS) and novel suture anchor (SA) fixation methods, and to investigate practicality of SA fixation in olecranon fractures using finite element analysis (FEA).
This finite element analysis study was conducted between May 2019 and October 2019. TBW, IS and SA fixation methods were compared in order to analyze fracture behavior in the ulna and humerus using FEA, which is among the mathematical methods of stress analysis. Boundary conditions were applied to the created model and total deformation amounts were compared among the methods in terms of displacement.
The lowest amount of displacement was obtained with TBW method (1.2095 mm), while IS method (2.7703 mm) showed the highest amount of total displacement. Total displacement was lower with SA system (2.0397 mm) compared to IS fixation. In addition, no problem was observed with SA system in terms of failure occurrence.
According to the results of FEA, although the lowest amount of displacement was obtained with TBW, it is concluded that anchor fixation method may be an alternative with practicality and mechanical properties. However, further studies are needed to obtain more precise data.
本研究旨在分析和比较张力带钢丝(TBW)、髓内螺钉(IS)和新型缝线锚钉(SA)固定方法的总变形情况,并通过有限元分析(FEA)研究SA固定在尺骨鹰嘴骨折中的实用性。
本有限元分析研究于2019年5月至2019年10月进行。比较TBW、IS和SA固定方法,以便使用FEA(应力分析的数学方法之一)分析尺骨和肱骨的骨折行为。对创建的模型施加边界条件,并在位移方面比较各方法的总变形量。
TBW方法获得的位移量最低(1.2095毫米),而IS方法(2.7703毫米)显示的总位移量最高。与IS固定相比,SA系统的总位移较低(2.0397毫米)。此外,SA系统在失效发生方面未观察到问题。
根据FEA的结果,虽然TBW获得的位移量最低,但得出结论认为锚钉固定方法可能是一种具有实用性和力学性能的替代方法。然而,需要进一步研究以获得更精确的数据。