Marsolais E B, Edwards B G
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Apr;69(4):243-9.
Two complete paraplegic subjects (T4 and T8), implanted with intramuscular electrodes, walked via functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) using a rolling walker and a reciprocal gait. The subjects also ambulated with long leg braces (LLB), using a rolling walker, and a drag/swing-to gait; and they stood using LLB and FNS separately. Oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), respiratory exchange ratio (VCO2/VO2), kcal/kg/meter, kcal/kg/minute, heart rate, blood pressure, and O2 debt with recovery time were recorded. During FNS walking, energy costs (kcal/kg/min) were 59% to 75% of maximal aerobic power (MAP), as determined during the combined activities of maximal arm ergometry and FNS leg stimulation. As the speed of FNS walking increased, there was no increase in energy costs; energy efficiency (kcal/kg/meter) equaled that of LLB ambulation. One subject showed decreased O2 debt with increased speed of FNS walking. At speeds approaching .4m/sec, FNS walking energy costs were similar to those of LLB ambulation. FNS energy costs relative to working muscle mass were less than those of LLB. When maximal stimulus parameters were used for FNS standing (20mA amplitude, 25 pps frequency, and 150 microseconds pulse width), energy costs were 100% more than those of normal or LLB standing. However, when the minimal stimulus necessary to maintain a standing position was used, FNS energy costs decreased by 35% to 47%. At speeds between .4 and .6m/sec, FNS walking is a viable alternative to LLB ambulation. Major energy cost reduction should be possible in the future.
两名完全性截瘫患者(T4和T8),植入了肌内电极,通过功能性神经肌肉刺激(FNS),使用滚动助行器和交互步态行走。这两名患者还使用滚动助行器和拖步/摆动到步幅的步态,借助长腿支具(LLB)行走;并且他们分别使用LLB和FNS站立。记录了耗氧量(VO2)、二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)、呼吸交换率(VCO2/VO2)、千卡/千克/米、千卡/千克/分钟、心率、血压以及恢复时间的氧债。在FNS行走过程中,能量消耗(千卡/千克/分钟)为最大有氧功率(MAP)的59%至75%,这是在最大手臂测力计和FNS腿部刺激的联合活动期间测定的。随着FNS行走速度的增加,能量消耗没有增加;能量效率(千卡/千克/米)与LLB行走时相当。一名患者随着FNS行走速度的增加,氧债减少。在接近0.4米/秒的速度时,FNS行走的能量消耗与LLB行走时相似。相对于工作肌肉质量,FNS的能量消耗低于LLB。当将最大刺激参数用于FNS站立时(振幅20毫安、频率25次/秒、脉冲宽度150微秒),能量消耗比正常或LLB站立时多100%。然而,当使用维持站立姿势所需的最小刺激时,FNS的能量消耗降低了35%至47%。在0.4至0.6米/秒的速度之间,FNS行走是LLB行走的可行替代方式。未来大幅降低能量消耗应该是可能的。