• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在长期护理入院后会保留他们的家庭医生吗?一项回顾性队列研究。

Do Patients Retain their Family Physicians after Long-Term Care Entry? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; ICES uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1951-1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.016
PMID:32586719
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Older adults value and benefit from the long-standing relationship they have with their family physicians. This dynamic has not been researched in a long-term care (LTC, ie, nursing home) setting. We sought to determine the proportion of LTC residents who retain their community family physician within the first 180 days of LTC, and the resident, physician, and LTC home factors that may influence retention.

DESIGN

Population-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Individuals from Ontario, Canada, aged 60 years or older who were newly admitted to a LTC home between April 1, 2014 and March 31, 2017.

METHODS

Residents were indexed upon LTC admission, and their data was linked across ICES databases. Residents were matched to their rostered family physician, and physician retention was defined as having at least 1 visit by their matched physician within 0 to 90 days and 90 to 180 days of LTC admission.

RESULTS

Out of 50,089 LTC residents, 12.1% retained their family physicians post-LTC admission. Resident factors associated with reduced odds of retention included physical impairment [odds ratio OR (95% confidence interval, CI) = 0.59 (0.42‒0.83)], cognitive impairment [0.39 (0.33‒0.47)], and a dementia diagnosis [0.80 (0.74‒0.86)]. Physician factors associated with lower retention included a greater distance from the LTC home to the family physician's clinic [30+ kilometers 0.41 (0.35‒0.48)], having a physician who is female [0.90 (0.83‒0.98)], an international medical graduate [0.89 (0.81‒0.97)] or someone who practices in a capitation-based Family Health Organization [0.86 (0.78‒0.95)]. Factors associated with greater odds of retention were residing in a rural LTC home [2.23 (1.78‒2.79)], having a rural family physician [1.70 (1.52‒1.90)], or a family physician who has billed LTC fee codes in the past year [2.64 (2.45‒2.85)].

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Few LTC residents retained their family physician post-LTC admission, underscoring this healthcare transition as a breakdown point in relational continuity. Factors that influenced retention included resident health, LTC home geography, and family physician demographics and practice patterns.

摘要

目的

老年人非常重视并受益于他们与家庭医生之间长期保持的关系。这一动态在长期护理(长期护理机构,即养老院)环境中尚未得到研究。我们试图确定在长期护理的头 180 天内,有多少长期护理居民保留了他们的社区家庭医生,以及可能影响保留率的居民、医生和长期护理机构的因素。

设计

基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

地点和参与者

2014 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间,安大略省年龄在 60 岁或以上、新入住长期护理机构的个人。

方法

居民在入住长期护理机构时被索引,并在安大略省临床评估科学研究所数据库中对其数据进行了链接。居民与他们的在册家庭医生相匹配,医生保留的定义是在入住长期护理机构后 0 至 90 天和 90 至 180 天内至少有一次由他们匹配的医生就诊。

结果

在 50089 名长期护理居民中,有 12.1%的人在入住长期护理机构后保留了家庭医生。与保留家庭医生的可能性降低相关的居民因素包括身体损伤[比值比(OR)(95%置信区间,CI)=0.59(0.42-0.83)]、认知障碍[0.39(0.33-0.47)]和痴呆诊断[0.80(0.74-0.86)]。与保留率较低相关的医生因素包括与长期护理机构的家庭医生诊所的距离较远[30 公里以上 0.41(0.35-0.48)]、医生为女性[0.90(0.83-0.98)]、国际医学毕业生[0.89(0.81-0.97)]或在基于人头的家庭健康组织中执业的医生[0.86(0.78-0.95)]。与保留率较高相关的因素包括居住在农村长期护理机构[2.23(1.78-2.79)]、有农村家庭医生[1.70(1.52-1.90)]或家庭医生在过去一年中开长期护理费用代码[2.64(2.45-2.85)]。

结论和意义

很少有长期护理居民在入住长期护理机构后保留了家庭医生,这突显了这种医疗保健过渡是关系连续性的一个中断点。影响保留率的因素包括居民健康、长期护理机构地理位置以及家庭医生的人口统计学和实践模式。

相似文献

1
Do Patients Retain their Family Physicians after Long-Term Care Entry? A Retrospective Cohort Study.患者在长期护理入院后会保留他们的家庭医生吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1951-1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
How Often, Where, and by Which Specialty Do Long-Term Care Home Residents Receive Specialist Physician Care? A Retrospective Cohort Study.长期护理院居民接受专科医生护理的频率、地点和专科是怎样的?一项回顾性队列研究。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Aug;40(8):837-846. doi: 10.1177/0733464819901255. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
3
The association between rurality, places of care and the location of death of long-term care home residents with dementia: A population-based study.农村性、护理地点与痴呆长期护理院居民死亡地点之间的关联:基于人群的研究。
Health Rep. 2024 Jul 17;35(7):3-13. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202400700001-eng.
4
Describing Differences Among Recent Immigrants and Long-Standing Residents Waiting for Long-Term Care: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.描述近期移民与长期居民在长期护理等待方面的差异:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):648-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Family physicians providing regular care to residents in Ontario long-term care homes: characteristics and practice patterns.为安大略省长期护理院居民提供常规护理的家庭医生:特征和实践模式。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Nov;58(11):1241-8.
6
Diagnostic Testing in Long-Term Care and Resident Emergency Department Visits: A Retrospective Cohort Study.长期护理和居民急诊就诊中的诊断检测:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):901-906.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.043. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Did the Long-Term Care Physician Workforce Change During the Pandemic? Describing MRP Trends in Ontario, Canada.疫情期间长期护理医生劳动力是否发生变化?描述加拿大安大略省的 MRP 趋势。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jul;24(7):1042-1047.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.036. Epub 2023 May 6.
8
Recent health care transitions and emergency department use by chronic long term care residents: a population-based cohort study.近期慢性长期护理居民的医疗保健转变和急诊部门使用情况:基于人群的队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Mar;13(3):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
9
Physician Availability in Long-Term Care and Resident Hospital Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.长期护理中的医生可用性和居民住院转移:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Apr;21(4):469-475.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Five-year risk of admission to long-term care home and death for older adults given a new diagnosis of dementia: a population-based retrospective cohort study.新诊断为痴呆症的老年人入住长期护理院和死亡的 5 年风险:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2020 Apr 20;192(16):E422-E430. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190999.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuity of care during long-term care transitions: a scoping review of the Canadian literature.长期护理过渡期间的连续性护理:对加拿大文献的范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12558-3.
2
Impact of changes in primary care attachment: a scoping review.基层医疗服务关系变化的影响:一项范围综述
Fam Med Community Health. 2025 Jan 28;13(1):e003115. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-003115.
3
Medication management in long-term care: using evidence generated from real-world data to effect policy change in the Australian setting.
长期护理中的药物管理:利用来自真实世界数据的证据推动澳大利亚政策变革。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 2;193(12):1645-1649. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae136.
4
Osteoporosis management in Australian aged care facilities: a mixed method study.澳大利亚老年护理机构中的骨质疏松症管理:一项混合方法研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 May 14;19(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01401-7.
5
Long-term care transitions during a global pandemic: Planning and decision-making of residents, care partners, and health professionals in Ontario, Canada.全球大流行期间的长期护理过渡:加拿大安大略省居民、护理伙伴和卫生专业人员的规划和决策。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0295865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295865. eCollection 2023.
6
Examining the determinants of health and long-term care for older adults in India through a socio-ecological model - A qualitative assessment.通过社会生态模型审视印度老年人的健康和长期护理决定因素——一项定性评估。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Aug;12(8):1615-1620. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_813_22. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
7
A Scoping Literature Review of Rural Institutional Elder Care.农村机构养老的范围文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 19;19(16):10319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610319.
8
Medicines use before and after comprehensive medicines review among residents of long-term care facilities: a retrospective cohort study.长期护理机构居民综合药物评估前后用药情况:回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 8;22(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03187-0.
9
Use of health and aged care services in Australia following hospital admission for myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure.澳大利亚人在因心肌梗死、中风或心力衰竭住院后的卫生和老年保健服务使用情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02519-w.
10
Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.长期护理中的提供者护理模式:快速范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254527. eCollection 2021.