Asada Yasuki, Kondo Yuya, Kobayashi Masanao, Kobayashi Kenichi, Ichikawa Takuma, Matsunaga Yuta
Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
J Radiol Prot. 2020 Sep;40(3):867-876. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/aba083.
Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs 2015) in Japan were first published in 2017, on the Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposures network. Medical facilities in Japan are now presumably reconsidering radiation doses at their facilities and approaching protection optimisation through the application of DRLs 2015. However, since more than 3 years have elapsed since publication, radiation doses received by patients in Japan may have diverged from DRLs 2015. We therefore undertook the present study. Based on our questionnaire survey implemented in 2017, we estimated the entrance skin dose (ESD) under general radiography fields and the mean glandular dose (MGD) under mammography, to compile a report on the doses received by patients under general radiography fields and mammography, and to propose new DRLs as replacements for DRLs 2015. Radiation doses under general radiography fields and mammography were estimated from the results of the 2017 questionnaire survey and applied to determine new DRLs at 75% values of dose distributions in general radiography fields and at 95% values of dose distributions in mammography. Among all the modes for general radiography fields and mammography, median ESD and MGD were significantly smaller with flat panel detector systems than with computed radiography systems. Comparison of the results with DRLs 2015 values showed a trend toward decreases in all imaging methods of the general radiography fields and mammography ranging from 5.0% (child chest radiography) to 31.7% (skull radiography). Moreover, responses showed that DRLs 2015 were recognised and used for comparison at many facilities. We have described the doses received by patients in general radiography fields and mammography in 2017 and proposed new DRLs as replacements for DRLs 2015. The DRLs we proposed for general radiography fields and mammography were determined to be lower than DRLs 2015 for all modes.
日本的诊断参考水平(2015年版)于2017年首次在日本医疗照射研究与信息网络上发布。日本的医疗机构目前可能正在重新审视其设施的辐射剂量,并通过应用2015年版诊断参考水平来实现防护最优化。然而,自发布以来已过去3年多时间,日本患者所接受的辐射剂量可能已偏离2015年版诊断参考水平。因此,我们开展了本研究。基于我们在2017年进行的问卷调查,我们估算了普通X线摄影检查时的体表入射剂量(ESD)以及乳腺摄影时的平均腺体剂量(MGD),以编撰一份关于普通X线摄影检查和乳腺摄影时患者所接受剂量的报告,并提出新的诊断参考水平以取代2015年版诊断参考水平。根据2017年问卷调查结果估算普通X线摄影检查和乳腺摄影时的辐射剂量,并应用这些剂量来确定新的诊断参考水平,普通X线摄影检查时取剂量分布的75%值,乳腺摄影时取剂量分布的95%值。在普通X线摄影检查和乳腺摄影的所有模式中,平板探测器系统的ESD和MGD中位数明显低于计算机X线摄影系统。将结果与2015年版诊断参考水平值进行比较显示,普通X线摄影检查和乳腺摄影的所有成像方法均有下降趋势,降幅从5.0%(儿童胸部X线摄影)至31.7%(颅骨X线摄影)。此外,调查反馈表明,许多机构认可并使用2015年版诊断参考水平进行比较。我们描述了2017年普通X线摄影检查和乳腺摄影时患者所接受的剂量,并提出新的诊断参考水平以取代2015年版诊断参考水平。我们针对普通X线摄影检查和乳腺摄影提出的诊断参考水平在所有模式下均低于2015年版诊断参考水平。