Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Clinical Research Support Unit, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):384-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
In the prehospital setting, pit-crew models of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have shown improvements in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Certain districts in North America have adopted this model, including Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Our objectives were to determine whether pit-crew CPR has an impact on survival to discharge after OHCA in Saskatoon, Canada.
This was a retrospective pre- and postintervention study. All adult patients who had an OHCA between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017 of presumed cardiac origin, in which the resuscitation attempt included CPR by trained prehospital responders, were considered for analysis. Our primary outcome was survival to discharge. Survival to admission and return of spontaneous circulation were secondary outcomes.
There were 860 OHCAs considered for our study. After 46 exclusions there were 442 in the non-pit-crew group (average age 63.7 years; 64.5% male) and 372 in the pit-crew group (average age 63.5 years; 67.5% male). Survival to discharge after an OHCA was 10.4% (95% confidence interval 7.7-13.6%) in the non-pit-crew group and 12.4% (95% CI 9.2-16.2%) in the pit-crew group, which did not meet statistical significance. Return of spontaneous circulation and survival to admission were 48.4% and 31.3%, respectively, in the non-pit-crew group and 46.7% and 32.3%, respectively, in the pit-crew group.
In our study, implementation of a pit-crew CPR model was not associated with an improvement in survival to discharge after OHCA.
在院外环境中,心肺复苏(CPR)的小组式模式已显示出提高院外心搏骤停(OHCA)后存活率的效果。包括加拿大萨斯卡通市(萨斯喀彻温省,加拿大)在内的一些地区已采用这种模式。
我们的目的是确定在加拿大萨斯卡通市,小组式 CPR 是否对 OHCA 后的出院存活率产生影响。
这是一项回顾性的干预前后研究。所有于 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间发生的、有复苏尝试(包括经培训的院外急救人员实施的 CPR)的 OHCA 成年患者均被考虑进行分析。我们的主要结局是出院存活率。入院存活率和自主循环恢复率是次要结局。
我们的研究共考虑了 860 例 OHCA。排除 46 例后,非小组式 CPR 组有 442 例(平均年龄 63.7 岁;64.5%为男性),小组式 CPR 组有 372 例(平均年龄 63.5 岁;67.5%为男性)。非小组式 CPR 组的 OHCA 后出院存活率为 10.4%(95%置信区间 7.7-13.6%),小组式 CPR 组为 12.4%(95%置信区间 9.2-16.2%),但未达到统计学意义。非小组式 CPR 组的自主循环恢复率和入院存活率分别为 48.4%和 31.3%,小组式 CPR 组分别为 46.7%和 32.3%。
在我们的研究中,实施小组式 CPR 模式与 OHCA 后出院存活率的提高无关。