• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

载药微球栓塞化疗与常规肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌疗效及生存的综合预测因素

Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of Radiology, Wuhan General Hospita of Guangzhou Military, 627 Wuluo Road, Wuhan 430070, China.

出版信息

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar;45(2):101460. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinre.2020.05.008
PMID:32593695
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely applied in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are not suitable for surgical treatment. We aimed to investigate the treatment outcomes and comprehensive prognostic factors of CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) treatment and conventional TACE (cTACE) treatment in HCC patients.

METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-five HCC patients received DEB-TACE or cTACE treatment were consecutively enrolled in multi-center, retrospective cohort study. Treatment response was conducted at M1, M3 or M6 after treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Thirty-seven baseline factors including demographic characteristics, clinical features, biochemical indexes and previous treatment histories were selected.

RESULTS

In total patients, history of drink and largest nodule size≥7cm independently predicted worse ORR, DEB-TACE predicted better OS, while largest nodule size≥7cm, increased Child-Pugh stage, ALB abnormal, ALP abnormal or AFP abnormal predicted worse survival. For DEB-TACE group, previous cTACE and ANC abnormal independently predicted worse ORR, and hepatic vein invasion, increased Child-Pugh stage or AFP abnormal independently predicted poor survival. For cTACE group, largest nodule size≥7cm independently predicted poor ORR, and multifocal disease as well as ALB abnormal predicted poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

History of drink, largest nodule size≥7cm, DEB-TACE, increased Child-Pugh stage, abnormal ALB, ALP or AFP are potential prognostic factors in total patients, previous cTACE and ANC abnormal, hepatic vein invasion, increased Child-Pugh stage or AFP abnormal are potential prognostic factors in DEB-TA group, and largest nodule size≥7cm, multifocal disease and ALB abnormal are potential prognostic factors in cTACE group.

摘要

背景

经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)广泛应用于不适合手术治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。我们旨在研究 CalliSpheres®微球(CSM)载药微球栓塞化疗(DEB-TACE)与传统 TACE(cTACE)治疗 HCC 患者的治疗效果和综合预后因素。

方法

本多中心回顾性队列研究连续纳入 335 例 HCC 患者,分别接受 DEB-TACE 或 cTACE 治疗。治疗后 1、3 或 6 个月进行治疗反应评估。记录无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。选择 37 项基线因素,包括人口统计学特征、临床特征、生化指标和既往治疗史。

结果

在所有患者中,饮酒史和最大结节直径≥7cm 独立预测较差的客观缓解率(ORR),DEB-TACE 预测较好的 OS,而最大结节直径≥7cm、增加的 Child-Pugh 分级、白蛋白异常、碱性磷酸酶异常或甲胎蛋白异常预测较差的生存。对于 DEB-TACE 组,既往 cTACE 和 ANC 异常独立预测较差的 ORR,而肝静脉侵犯、增加的 Child-Pugh 分级或 AFP 异常独立预测较差的生存。对于 cTACE 组,最大结节直径≥7cm 独立预测较差的 ORR,多灶性病变和白蛋白异常预测较差的 OS。

结论

饮酒史、最大结节直径≥7cm、DEB-TACE、增加的 Child-Pugh 分级、白蛋白异常、碱性磷酸酶异常或 AFP 异常是所有患者的潜在预后因素,既往 cTACE 和 ANC 异常、肝静脉侵犯、增加的 Child-Pugh 分级或 AFP 异常是 DEB-TACE 组的潜在预后因素,而最大结节直径≥7cm、多灶性病变和白蛋白异常是 cTACE 组的潜在预后因素。

相似文献

1
Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球栓塞化疗与常规肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌疗效及生存的综合预测因素
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar;45(2):101460. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Comparison of treatment response, survival and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球(CalliSpheres®)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性比较
J BUON. 2019 May-Jun;24(3):1150-1166.
3
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球(CalliSpheres)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术作为肝细胞癌患者一线治疗的疗效与安全性比较
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):7456-7470. eCollection 2019.
5
The Comprehensive Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of CalliSpheres Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization in 367 Liver Cancer Patients: A Multiple-Center, Cohort Study.367 例肝癌患者中 CalliSpheres 载药微球栓塞化疗的疗效和安全性综合分析:一项多中心队列研究。
Oncol Res. 2020 May 29;28(3):249-271. doi: 10.3727/096504019X15766663541105. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: A comparison of efficacy and safety.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与传统TACE治疗有多次传统TACE治疗史的肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(21):e15314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015314.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization by CalliSpheres in 275 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Results From the Chinese CalliSpheres Transarterial Chemoembolization in Liver Cancer (CTILC) Study.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗 275 例肝癌患者的疗效和安全性:来自中国载药微球肝癌化疗栓塞术(CTILC)研究的结果。
Oncol Res. 2020 Feb 7;28(1):75-94. doi: 10.3727/096504019X15662966719585. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.载药微球与常规 TACE 治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
9
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history.对于有传统经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗史的肝细胞癌患者,载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)显示出比传统TACE更好的疗效和相同的耐受性。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;46(3):101814. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101814. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.比较载药微球与常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中国肝细胞癌患者的疗效和生存预后:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Oncol Res. 2019 May 7;27(5):583-592. doi: 10.3727/096504018X15368325811545.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical predictors for liver function impairment and post-embolization syndrome following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in primary hepatic carcinoma patients: a retrospective study.原发性肝癌患者经动脉化疗栓塞术后肝功能损害和栓塞后综合征的临床预测因素:一项回顾性研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 May 15;15(5):2259-2274. doi: 10.62347/PJVG6340. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy analysis of drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combining systemic chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞联合全身化疗及免疫检查点抑制剂治疗不可切除肝内胆管癌的疗效分析:一项基于倾向评分匹配的多中心回顾性队列研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 24;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03679-4.
3
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: A meta‑analysis.门静脉血栓形成的肝细胞癌新辅助治疗的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jan 7;29(3):122. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.14868. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Postoperative Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization.乙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌患者接受术后辅助经动脉化疗栓塞术预测模型的开发与验证
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023 Oct 24;10:1881-1895. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S422565. eCollection 2023.
5
Preliminary outcomes of DEB-TACE loaded with raltitrexed in the treatment of unresectable or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.载雷替曲塞 DEB-TACE 治疗不可切除或复发性肝细胞癌的初步结果。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Feb 22;23(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00534-1.
6
Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.载药微球与常规 TACE 治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
7
Development and Validation of a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A-associated Prognostic Model for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.不可切除肝细胞癌血管内皮生长因子A相关预后模型的建立与验证
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023 Feb 5;10:139-156. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S399299. eCollection 2023.
8
Tumor Response and Nomogram-Based Prognostic Stratification for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization.经动脉化疗栓塞术联合载药微球治疗肝细胞癌后的肿瘤反应及基于列线图的预后分层
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2022 Jun 7;9:537-551. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S360421. eCollection 2022.
9
Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Both Combined Apatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术联合阿帕替尼治疗肝细胞癌:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Nov 26;8:1459-1471. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S338309. eCollection 2021.