文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

载药微球与常规 TACE 治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究

Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.


DOI:10.2478/raon-2023-0001
PMID:36794998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039469/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: This trial aimed to compare the outcomes of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CalliSpheres microspheres (CSM) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization cTACE in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients were divided into DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and cTACE group (n = 45). The treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) in the DEB-TACE group was significantly higher than that in cTACE group at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up ( = 0.031, = 0.003, = 0.002). The complete response (CR) in DEB-TACE group was significantly higher than that in cTACE group at 3 months ( = 0.036). Survival analysis revealed that, DEB-TACE group had better survival benefits than cTACE group (median OS: 534 days . 367 days, = 0.027; median PFS: 352 days . 278 days = 0.004). The degree of liver function injury was more serious in DEB-TACE group at 1 week, but was similar between the two groups at 1 month. DEB-TACE with CSM caused a high incidence of fever and a severe abdominal pain ( = 0.031, = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE with CSM showed better treatment response and survival benefits than cTACE group. Although a transient more severe liver damage, high incidence of fever and a severe abdominal pain occurred in the DEB-TACE group, it could be resolved through symptomatic treatment.

摘要

背景:本试验旨在比较载药微球栓塞化疗(DEB-TACE)与 CalliSpheres 微球(CSM)和常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞(cTACE)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效。

患者和方法:共 90 例患者分为 DEB-TACE 组(n=45)和 cTACE 组(n=45)。比较两组的治疗反应、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。

结果:DEB-TACE 组的客观缓解率(ORR)在随访 1、3 和 6 个月时明显高于 cTACE 组(=0.031、=0.003、=0.002)。DEB-TACE 组的完全缓解(CR)在 3 个月时明显高于 cTACE 组(=0.036)。生存分析显示,DEB-TACE 组的生存获益优于 cTACE 组(中位 OS:534 天. 367 天,=0.027;中位 PFS:352 天. 278 天,=0.004)。DEB-TACE 组在 1 周时肝功能损伤程度较严重,但在 1 个月时两组相似。DEB-TACE 联合 CSM 引起的发热和腹痛发生率较高(=0.031、=0.037)。

结论:DEB-TACE 联合 CSM 比 cTACE 组具有更好的治疗反应和生存获益。虽然 DEB-TACE 组会出现一过性更严重的肝损伤、发热发生率较高和严重腹痛,但可通过对症治疗缓解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/10039469/e2fc2d70e46f/raon-57-070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/10039469/841b98f7b72f/raon-57-070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/10039469/e7df68ce9991/raon-57-070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/10039469/e2fc2d70e46f/raon-57-070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/10039469/841b98f7b72f/raon-57-070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/10039469/e7df68ce9991/raon-57-070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a873/10039469/e2fc2d70e46f/raon-57-070-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Radiol Oncol. 2023-3-1

[2]
CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study.

World J Surg Oncol. 2018-3-27

[3]
Callispheres® drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization might be an efficient and safety down-staging therapy in unresectable liver cancer patients.

World J Surg Oncol. 2022-8-9

[4]
Comparison of treatment response, survival and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma.

J BUON. 2019

[5]
Comparison of DEB-TACE and cTACE for the initial treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-seven criteria: A single-center propensity score matching analysis.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022-5

[6]
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Am J Transl Res. 2019-12-15

[7]
Comparison of Treatment Response, Survival Profiles, as Well as Safety Profiles Between CalliSpheres Microsphere Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Front Oncol. 2022-1-21

[8]
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022-3

[9]
Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021-3

[10]
Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety.

BMC Cancer. 2019-11-29

引用本文的文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of D-TACE followed by D-RFA for unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Front Oncol. 2025-7-28

[2]
Case Report: Durable complete response of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma to DEB-TACE combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab.

Front Immunol. 2025-6-20

[3]
Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients.

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025-2-7

[4]
Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety between D-TACE + HAIC + lenvatinib and D-TACE + lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

BMC Cancer. 2024-11-18

[5]
Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres transarterial chemoembolization for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics.

Radiol Oncol. 2024-10-4

[6]
A Simple Prognostic Scoring System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with DEB-TACE.

J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024-7-10

[7]
Locoregional Therapies for Hepatobiliary Tumors: Contemporary Strategies and Novel Applications.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-3-25

[8]
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) and Drug-Eluting Bead (DEB)-TACE in the Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Cureus. 2023-7-16

[9]
Analysis and prediction of the efficacy and influencing factors of camrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparison of DEB-TACE and cTACE for the initial treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-seven criteria: A single-center propensity score matching analysis.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022-5

[2]
Treatment Response, Survival, and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization With CalliSpheres Microspheres Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Front Oncol. 2021-3-16

[3]
Imaging Changes and Clinical Complications After Drug-Eluting Bead Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Study.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021-10

[4]
Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021-3

[5]
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

Cancer Manag Res. 2020-2-10

[6]
Arsenic trioxide-eluting Callispheres beads is more effective and equally tolerant compared with arsenic trioxide/lipiodol emulsion in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020-2

[7]
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Am J Transl Res. 2019-12-15

[8]
The Comprehensive Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of CalliSpheres Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization in 367 Liver Cancer Patients: A Multiple-Center, Cohort Study.

Oncol Res. 2019-12-19

[9]
Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization by CalliSpheres in 275 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Results From the Chinese CalliSpheres Transarterial Chemoembolization in Liver Cancer (CTILC) Study.

Oncol Res. 2019-9-26

[10]
Intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a summary review.

J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2019-7-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索