Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
BACKGROUND: This trial aimed to compare the outcomes of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CalliSpheres microspheres (CSM) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization cTACE in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients were divided into DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and cTACE group (n = 45). The treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) in the DEB-TACE group was significantly higher than that in cTACE group at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up ( = 0.031, = 0.003, = 0.002). The complete response (CR) in DEB-TACE group was significantly higher than that in cTACE group at 3 months ( = 0.036). Survival analysis revealed that, DEB-TACE group had better survival benefits than cTACE group (median OS: 534 days . 367 days, = 0.027; median PFS: 352 days . 278 days = 0.004). The degree of liver function injury was more serious in DEB-TACE group at 1 week, but was similar between the two groups at 1 month. DEB-TACE with CSM caused a high incidence of fever and a severe abdominal pain ( = 0.031, = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE with CSM showed better treatment response and survival benefits than cTACE group. Although a transient more severe liver damage, high incidence of fever and a severe abdominal pain occurred in the DEB-TACE group, it could be resolved through symptomatic treatment.
背景:本试验旨在比较载药微球栓塞化疗(DEB-TACE)与 CalliSpheres 微球(CSM)和常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞(cTACE)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效。
患者和方法:共 90 例患者分为 DEB-TACE 组(n=45)和 cTACE 组(n=45)。比较两组的治疗反应、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。
结果:DEB-TACE 组的客观缓解率(ORR)在随访 1、3 和 6 个月时明显高于 cTACE 组(=0.031、=0.003、=0.002)。DEB-TACE 组的完全缓解(CR)在 3 个月时明显高于 cTACE 组(=0.036)。生存分析显示,DEB-TACE 组的生存获益优于 cTACE 组(中位 OS:534 天. 367 天,=0.027;中位 PFS:352 天. 278 天,=0.004)。DEB-TACE 组在 1 周时肝功能损伤程度较严重,但在 1 个月时两组相似。DEB-TACE 联合 CSM 引起的发热和腹痛发生率较高(=0.031、=0.037)。
结论:DEB-TACE 联合 CSM 比 cTACE 组具有更好的治疗反应和生存获益。虽然 DEB-TACE 组会出现一过性更严重的肝损伤、发热发生率较高和严重腹痛,但可通过对症治疗缓解。
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024-7-10
Cancers (Basel). 2024-3-25
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2019-7-11