Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂与院外心脏骤停时首次记录的心律的相关性:来自两个欧洲国家基于人群队列的真实世界数据。

Association of beta-blockers and first-registered heart rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: real-world data from population-based cohorts across two European countries.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Europace. 2020 Aug 1;22(8):1206-1215. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa124.

Abstract

AIMS

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of beta-blockers on first-registered heart rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to establish whether the use of beta-blockers influences first-registered rhythm in OHCA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included patients with OHCA of presumed cardiac cause from two large independent OHCA-registries from Denmark and the Netherlands. Beta-blocker use was defined as exposure to either non-selective beta-blockers, β1-selective beta-blockers, or α-β-dual-receptor blockers within 90 days prior to OHCA. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of beta-blockers with first-registered heart rhythm using multivariable logistic regression. We identified 23 834 OHCA-patients in Denmark and 1584 in the Netherlands: 7022 (29.5%) and 519 (32.8%) were treated with beta-blockers, respectively. Use of non-selective beta-blockers, but not β1-selective blockers, was more often associated with non-shockable rhythm than no use of beta-blockers [Denmark: OR 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-2.52; the Netherlands: OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15-5.49]. Non-selective beta-blocker use was associated with higher proportion of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) than of shockable rhythm (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.01-5.65); the association with asystole was of similar magnitude, although not statistically significant compared with shockable rhythm (OR 2.34, 95% CI 0.89-6.18; data on PEA and asystole were only available in the Netherlands). Use of α-β-dual-receptor blockers was significantly associated with non-shockable rhythm in Denmark (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03-1.42) and not significantly in the Netherlands (OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.61-3.07).

CONCLUSION

Non-selective beta-blockers, but not β1-selective beta-blockers, are associated with non-shockable rhythm in OHCA.

摘要

目的

关于β受体阻滞剂对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)首次记录的心律的影响,已有相互矛盾的结果报告。我们旨在确定β受体阻滞剂的使用是否会影响 OHCA 中的首次记录节律。

方法和结果

我们纳入了来自丹麦和荷兰的两个大型独立 OHCA 注册中心的 OHCA 疑似心源性患者。β受体阻滞剂的使用定义为在 OHCA 前 90 天内使用非选择性β受体阻滞剂、β1 选择性β受体阻滞剂或α-β 双重受体阻滞剂。我们使用多变量逻辑回归计算了β受体阻滞剂与首次记录的心律之间关联的优势比(OR)。我们在丹麦确定了 23834 例 OHCA 患者和 1584 例荷兰患者:7022 例(29.5%)和 519 例(32.8%)分别接受了β受体阻滞剂治疗。与未使用β受体阻滞剂相比,非选择性β受体阻滞剂的使用更常与非可电击节律相关,而非β1 选择性阻滞剂[丹麦:OR 1.93,95%置信区间(CI)1.48-2.52;荷兰:OR 2.52,95%CI 1.15-5.49]。非选择性β受体阻滞剂的使用与更高比例的无脉电活动(PEA)相关,而非可电击节律(OR 2.38,95%CI 1.01-5.65);与停搏的关联相似,尽管与可电击节律相比无统计学意义(OR 2.34,95%CI 0.89-6.18;仅在荷兰有关于 PEA 和停搏的数据)。在丹麦,α-β 双重受体阻滞剂的使用与非可电击节律显著相关(OR 1.21;95%CI 1.03-1.42),而在荷兰则无显著相关性(OR 1.37;95%CI 0.61-3.07)。

结论

非选择性β受体阻滞剂而非β1 选择性β受体阻滞剂与 OHCA 中的非可电击节律相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a20/7400473/efae8c202815/euaa124f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验