• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

森林对模拟升高的 CO 2 的响应取决于基于大小和年龄的死亡率的假设。

Forest responses to simulated elevated CO under alternate hypotheses of size- and age-dependent mortality.

机构信息

Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Centre Européen de Recherche et de Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct;26(10):5734-5753. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15254. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.15254
PMID:32594557
Abstract

Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (eCO ) is predicted to increase growth rates of forest trees. The extent to which increased growth translates to changes in biomass is dependent on the turnover time of the carbon, and thus tree mortality rates. Size- or age-dependent mortality combined with increased growth rates could result in either decreased carbon turnover from a speeding up of tree life cycles, or increased biomass from trees reaching larger sizes, respectively. However, most vegetation models currently lack any representation of size- or age-dependent mortality and the effect of eCO on changes in biomass and carbon turnover times is thus a major source of uncertainty in predictions of future vegetation dynamics. Using a reduced-complexity form of the vegetation demographic model the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator to simulate an idealised tropical forest, we find increases in biomass despite reductions in carbon turnover time in both size- and age-dependent mortality scenarios in response to a hypothetical eCO -driven 25% increase in woody net primary productivity (wNPP). Carbon turnover times decreased by 9.6% in size-dependent mortality scenarios due to a speeding up of tree life cycles, but also by 2.0% when mortality was age-dependent, as larger crowns led to increased light competition. Increases in aboveground biomass (AGB) were much larger when mortality was age-dependent (24.3%) compared with size-dependent (13.4%) as trees reached larger sizes before death. In simulations with a constant background mortality rate, carbon turnover time decreased by 2.1% and AGB increased by 24.0%, however, absolute values of AGB and carbon turnover were higher than in either size- or age-dependent mortality scenario. The extent to which AGB increases and carbon turnover decreases will thus depend on the mechanisms of large tree mortality: if increased size itself results in elevated mortality rates, then this could reduce by about half the increase in AGB relative to the increase in wNPP.

摘要

大气中二氧化碳浓度升高(eCO2)预计会增加森林树木的生长速度。增长幅度转化为生物量变化的程度取决于碳的周转率,因此也取决于树木的死亡率。大小或年龄相关的死亡率加上增长率的增加,可能导致树木生命周期的加速导致碳周转率降低,或者树木达到更大的大小导致生物量增加。然而,大多数植被模型目前都没有表示大小或年龄相关的死亡率,因此 eCO2 对生物量和碳周转率变化的影响是预测未来植被动态的主要不确定性来源之一。使用简化复杂度的植被动态模型——功能组装陆地生态系统模拟器,模拟理想的热带森林,我们发现,尽管在大小和年龄相关的死亡率情景中碳周转率都降低,但生物量仍有增加,这是对木质净初级生产力(wNPP)假设增加 25%的 eCO2 驱动的响应。在大小相关的死亡率情景中,由于树木生命周期的加速,碳周转率降低了 9.6%,但当死亡率是年龄相关时,碳周转率也降低了 2.0%,因为更大的树冠会导致更激烈的光竞争。当死亡率是年龄相关时,地上生物量(AGB)的增加幅度(24.3%)比大小相关时(13.4%)大得多,因为树木在死亡前达到了更大的大小。在背景死亡率不变的模拟中,碳周转率降低了 2.1%,AGB 增加了 24.0%,然而,AGB 和碳周转率的绝对值高于大小或年龄相关的死亡率情景。因此,AGB 的增加幅度和碳周转率的降低幅度将取决于大树死亡率的机制:如果树木的大小本身导致死亡率升高,那么相对于 wNPP 的增加,AGB 的增加幅度可能会减少一半。

相似文献

1
Forest responses to simulated elevated CO under alternate hypotheses of size- and age-dependent mortality.森林对模拟升高的 CO 2 的响应取决于基于大小和年龄的死亡率的假设。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct;26(10):5734-5753. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15254. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
2
Variation in stem mortality rates determines patterns of above-ground biomass in Amazonian forests: implications for dynamic global vegetation models.树干死亡率的变化决定了亚马逊森林地上生物量的模式:对动态全球植被模型的启示。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):3996-4013. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13315. Epub 2016 May 19.
3
Alteration of forest succession and carbon cycling under elevated CO2.大气 CO2 浓度升高下森林演替和碳循环的改变。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):351-63. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13077. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
4
Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites.碳去了哪里?两个温带森林自由空气二氧化碳富集站点植被碳分配与周转过程的模型-数据对比
New Phytol. 2014 Aug;203(3):883-99. doi: 10.1111/nph.12847. Epub 2014 May 21.
5
Damage to living trees contributes to almost half of the biomass losses in tropical forests.活体树木的破坏导致了热带森林近一半的生物量损失。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Jun;29(12):3409-3420. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16687. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
6
Response of tree biomass and wood litter to disturbance in a Central Amazon forest.亚马孙中部森林中树木生物量和枯落物对干扰的响应
Oecologia. 2004 Dec;141(4):596-611. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1676-2. Epub 2004 Sep 7.
7
Tree crown damage and its effects on forest carbon cycling in a tropical forest.树冠损害及其对热带森林碳循环的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Sep;28(18):5560-5574. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16318. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
8
Evaluation of climate-related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests.北方和温带森林全球植被模型中与气候相关的碳周转过程评估。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Aug;23(8):3076-3091. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13660. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Improving predictions of tropical forest response to climate change through integration of field studies and ecosystem modeling.通过整合实地研究和生态系统建模来提高对热带森林对气候变化响应的预测。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):e213-e232. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13863. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Variation in hydroclimate sustains tropical forest biomass and promotes functional diversity.水热变化维持着热带森林生物量,并促进了功能多样性。
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):932-946. doi: 10.1111/nph.15271. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The weak land carbon sink hypothesis.弱陆地碳汇假说。
Sci Adv. 2025 Sep 12;11(37):eadr5489. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr5489. Epub 2025 Sep 10.
2
Time Effects of Global Change on Forest Productivity in China from 2001 to 2017.2001年至2017年全球变化对中国森林生产力的时间效应
Plants (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;12(6):1404. doi: 10.3390/plants12061404.