• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population.日本人群中创伤后应激障碍病例的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)、精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)与以往诊断手册的患病率及共病情况。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 May 19;11(1):1753938. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938. eCollection 2020.
2
A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD prevalence, comorbidity and disability: an analysis of the Ukrainian Internally Displaced Person's Mental Health Survey.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍患病率、共病和残疾的比较:对乌克兰境内流离失所者心理健康调查的分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Feb;137(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/acps.12840. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
A comparison of ICD-11 and DSM criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in two national samples of U.S. military veterans.美国退伍军人两个全国性样本中创伤后应激障碍的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM)标准比较
J Affect Disord. 2017 Dec 1;223:17-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
4
Prevalence and concordance of International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fifth Edition posttraumatic stress diagnostics among Northern Irish military veterans.《国际疾病分类第11版》与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》对北爱尔兰退伍军人创伤后应激障碍诊断的患病率及一致性
Psychol Trauma. 2025 Feb;17(2):396-405. doi: 10.1037/tra0001638. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
5
Same same but different? DSM-5 versus ICD-11 PTSD among traumatized refugees in Germany.相同又不同?德国创伤后应激障碍难民的 DSM-5 与 ICD-11 比较。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Jul;134:110129. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110129. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
An evaluation of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in two samples of adolescents and young adults exposed to mass shootings: factor analysis and comparisons to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.对遭受大规模枪击事件的青少年和青年两个样本中ICD - 11创伤后应激障碍标准的评估:因素分析以及与ICD - 10和DSM - IV的比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0849-y.
7
Empirical examination of a proposed refinement to DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder symptom criteria using the National Comorbidity Survey Replication data.利用全国共病调查复制数据对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版创伤后应激障碍症状标准的一项拟议改进进行实证检验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):597-602. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0411.
8
Applicability of the ICD-11 proposal for PTSD: a comparison of prevalence and comorbidity rates with the DSM-IV PTSD classification in two post-conflict samples.ICD-11 提案中创伤后应激障碍的适用性:与两个冲突后样本中 DSM-IV PTSD 分类的患病率和共病率比较。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 May 18;6:27070. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27070. eCollection 2015.
9
[Diagnostics of posttraumatic stress disorder according to DSM-5 and ICD-11].[根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)对创伤后应激障碍的诊断]
Nervenarzt. 2019 Jul;90(7):733-739. doi: 10.1007/s00115-018-0668-0.
10
The impact of changing diagnostic criteria in posttraumatic stress disorder in a Canadian epidemiologic sample.改变创伤后应激障碍诊断标准对加拿大流行病学样本的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1034-41. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05700. Epub 2011 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Posttraumatic stress disorder in disaster-exposed youth: examining diagnostic concordance and model fit using ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria.受灾青少年的创伤后应激障碍:使用国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)标准检查诊断一致性和模型拟合度
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05317-6.
2
A comparison of ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria of PTSD among Chinese trauma-exposed adolescent samples.中国遭受创伤的青少年样本中创伤后应激障碍的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)标准比较
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 13;14:1186138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1186138. eCollection 2023.
3
A clinician rating to diagnose CPTSD according to ICD-11 and to evaluate CPTSD symptom severity: Complex PTSD Item Set additional to the CAPS (COPISAC).根据《国际疾病分类第11版》诊断复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)并评估CPTSD症状严重程度的临床医生评分:儿童创伤后应激障碍症状检查表(CAPS)之外的复杂性创伤后应激障碍项目集(COPISAC)。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021;12(1):1891726. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1891726.
4
Screening for psychotrauma related symptoms: Japanese translation and pilot testing of the Global Psychotrauma Screen.心理创伤相关症状筛查:《全球心理创伤筛查量表》的日文翻译及预试验
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Sep 17;11(1):1810893. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1810893.

本文引用的文献

1
Complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) following captivity: a 24-year longitudinal study.囚禁后的复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD):一项为期24年的纵向研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 28;10(1):1616488. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1616488. eCollection 2019.
2
Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5: Psychometric properties in a Japanese population.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5:日本人群中的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 15;247:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.086. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
Factorial Validity and Invariance of the 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) Among Populations With and Without Self-Reported Psychiatric Diagnostic Status.在有和没有自我报告精神科诊断状态的人群中,7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)的因子效度和不变性
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 19;9:1741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01741. eCollection 2018.
4
The International Trauma Questionnaire: development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD.国际创伤问卷:ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 的自评量表的制定。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):536-546. doi: 10.1111/acps.12956. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Performance of the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (J-PHQ-9) for depression in primary care.日本版患者健康问卷-9(J-PHQ-9)在初级保健中用于评估抑郁症状的性能。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018 May-Jun;52:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD prevalence, comorbidity and disability: an analysis of the Ukrainian Internally Displaced Person's Mental Health Survey.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍患病率、共病和残疾的比较:对乌克兰境内流离失所者心理健康调查的分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Feb;137(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/acps.12840. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD.规模真的重要吗?一项多地点研究,评估拟议的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)创伤后应激障碍诊断标准的潜在结构。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Nov 13;8(sup7):1398002. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1398002. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: changes in PTSD prevalence in military personnel.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)与国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的拟议标准与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)及国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)的比较:军事人员中PTSD患病率的变化
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 17;8(1):1386988. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1386988. eCollection 2017.
9
A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD.当前有关 ICD-11 诊断 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 建议的证据综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Examining the diagnostic utility of the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms among male and female returning veterans.研究《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍症状在退伍男性和女性中的诊断效用。
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Aug;34(8):752-760. doi: 10.1002/da.22667. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

日本人群中创伤后应激障碍病例的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)、精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)与以往诊断手册的患病率及共病情况。

Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population.

作者信息

Oe Misari, Ito Masaya, Takebayashi Yoshitake, Katayanagi Akiko, Horikoshi Masaru

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.

National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 May 19;11(1):1753938. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938
PMID:32595913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7301694/
Abstract

: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ between DSM-5 and ICD-11, which may affect the estimation of prevalence. : To investigate the concordance of ICD-11 and DSM-5, as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-IV, regarding PTSD caseness among Japanese people who had experienced different potentially traumatic events. In addition, we estimated the comorbidity with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder according to these four diagnostic manuals. : A web-based survey ( = 6,180) was conducted from November 2016 to March 2017. Participants completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and other standardized measures of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. : The prevalence of PTSD caseness according to ICD-11 was significantly lower as compared to DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-10. Cohen's kappa between DSM-5 and ICD-11 was 0.79, indicating substantial agreement. Comorbidity with depression was significantly higher in unique DSM-5 cases than in unique ICD-11 cases. Unique DSM-5 PTSD cases were significantly stronger functionally impaired than unique ICD-11 PTSD cases. : Although requiring fewer items, the ICD-11 showed substantial agreement with DSM-5 regarding PTSD caseness. The lower comorbidity rates in unique cases may support the concept of the ICD-11 which intends to reduce comorbidity by identifying the core elements of PTSD.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)中有所不同,这可能会影响患病率的估计。为了调查ICD - 11与DSM - 5相比,与ICD - 10和DSM - Ⅳ相比,在经历不同潜在创伤事件的日本人中PTSD病例的一致性。此外,我们根据这四本诊断手册估计了与重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症的共病情况。2016年11月至2017年3月进行了一项基于网络的调查(n = 6180)。参与者完成了DSM - 5的PTSD检查表以及其他PTSD、抑郁和焦虑的标准化测量。与DSM - Ⅳ、DSM - 5和ICD - 10相比,根据ICD - 11诊断的PTSD病例患病率显著更低。DSM - 5和ICD - 11之间的科恩kappa系数为0.79,表明一致性较高。在仅符合DSM - 5标准的病例中,与抑郁症的共病率显著高于仅符合ICD - 11标准的病例。仅符合DSM - 5标准的PTSD病例在功能损害方面比仅符合ICD - 11标准的PTSD病例显著更严重。尽管所需项目较少,但ICD - 11在PTSD病例方面与DSM - 5显示出较高的一致性。仅符合单一标准病例中较低的共病率可能支持ICD - 11通过识别PTSD核心要素来降低共病率的概念。