Should a Drain Be Routinely Required After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy?

Closed drains have traditionally been placed after partial nephrectomy because of risks of bleeding and urine leak. We sought to study the safety of a nonroutine drain (NRD) approach after transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). From a multi-institutional database, we have analyzed the data of 904 patients who underwent RPN. Five hundred forty-six (60.40%) patients underwent RPN by a surgeon who routinely placed drains. Three hundred fifty-eight (39.60%) patients underwent RPN by a surgeon who did not routinely placed drains. Perioperative outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates were compared between the two groups. Baseline characteristics, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. Patients in the NRD group were more likely to have higher body mass index (30.10 kg/m 28.07 kg/m;  < 0.001), higher tumor size (3.0 cm 2.5 cm;  = 0.001), and higher renal score (8 7;  < 0.001). Rate of transfusion (0.00% NRD 0.56% RD;  = 0.157) and overall complication (7.33% NRD 7.82% RD;  = 0.782) were comparable. Median hospital stay is 1 day for both groups. Readmission rate was also similar (0.55% NRD 1.40% RD;  = 0.279). In a multivariable analysis, NRD approach was associated with shorter length of hospital stay (incidence rate ratio [IRR] - 0.72,  < 0.001). An NRD approach for RPN yielded a decreased LOS and similar perioperative outcomes. Placement of surgical drains should be based on individual circumstances, and not required on a routine basis.