Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, 18 College Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 006, India.
NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London and University College London, London, EC1V 2PD, UK.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 29;10(1):10513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67350-6.
To provide the real-world outcomes of people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in India and highlight opportunities for improvement of their disease status and to evaluate their visual acuity (VA) status. A multicenter retrospective study in which ten centers in India with established vitreoretinal services for over 10 years were invited to provide long-term data on PDR. This study population were of Indian nationality. Patients with a diagnosis of type 1 or 2 diabetes with a clinical diagnosis of active PDR in any or both eyes, who had long term follow-up for up to 10 years were included. Baseline data collected included age, sex, duration of diabetes, source of referral and best-corrected visual acuity, diabetic retinopathy status in both eyes. Available follow-up data on VA were collected at 6 months post baseline, 5 years and 10 years within a ± 3 months window. Evaluating the presenting VA of people with PDR, short-term outcomes at 6 months and the incidence of visual impairment (VI) at 5 and 10 years are the main outcome of the study. Data was available for 516, 424 and 455 patients at baseline, 5 years and 10 years respectively. Gender and duration of diabetes did not have statistically significant effect on VI outcomes. Eyes receiving treatment early in the disease course (i.e. baseline VA ≥ 6/12) had significantly better VA outcomes at 10 years versus eyes treated at a later stage (i.e. baseline VA < 6/12) (p = <0.0001). On comparing eyes with stable treated PDR and persistent PDR at end of 10 year follow up, a significantly higher percentage of eyes in the stable treated group maintained VA of ≥ 6/12 (55.1% vs. 24.2%) (p = < 0.0001), indicating persistent disease activity due to inadequate treatment results in worse VA outcomes. We found no trend in VI or blindness with increasing levels of age at both 5- and 10-year time points (p > 0.05). The age standardized incidence for VI was 11.10% (95% CI 8.1, 14.2) and for blindness was found to be 7.7% (95% CI 5.2, 10.3). Our results suggest that despite robust recent clinical trial results showing that pan retinal photocoagulation is an excellent treatment for PDR, people with diabetes in India need to be made aware of annual screening and treatment of their eyes to avoid vision impairment and blindness.
为了提供印度增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)患者的真实世界结局,并强调改善其疾病状况的机会,评估其视力(VA)状况。这是一项多中心回顾性研究,邀请了印度的 10 个中心,这些中心拥有超过 10 年的玻璃体视网膜服务,提供 PDR 的长期数据。本研究人群为印度国籍。纳入标准为 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者,临床诊断为双眼活动性 PDR,长期随访时间长达 10 年。收集的基线数据包括年龄、性别、糖尿病病程、转诊来源和最佳矫正视力、双眼糖尿病视网膜病变状况。在±3 个月的时间窗口内,收集 6 个月、5 年和 10 年的 VA 随访数据。评估 PDR 患者的初始 VA、6 个月时的短期结局以及 5 年和 10 年时的视力损害(VI)发生率是本研究的主要结局。基线、5 年和 10 年时分别有 516、424 和 455 例患者的数据可用。性别和糖尿病病程对 VI 结局没有统计学显著影响。在疾病早期接受治疗的眼睛(即基线 VA≥6/12)在 10 年时的 VA 结局明显优于晚期治疗的眼睛(即基线 VA<6/12)(p<0.0001)。比较 10 年随访结束时稳定治疗 PDR 组和持续 PDR 组的眼睛,稳定治疗组有更高比例的眼睛保持≥6/12 的 VA(55.1% vs. 24.2%)(p<0.0001),表明由于治疗不足导致持续性疾病活动导致 VA 结局更差。我们在 5 年和 10 年时间点都没有发现 VI 或失明的发生率随年龄增加而增加的趋势(p>0.05)。VI 的年龄标准化发生率为 11.10%(95%CI 8.1,14.2),失明的发生率为 7.7%(95%CI 5.2,10.3)。我们的研究结果表明,尽管最近的临床试验结果表明全视网膜光凝是治疗 PDR 的一种极好方法,但印度的糖尿病患者需要意识到每年筛查和治疗眼睛,以避免视力损害和失明。