• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触到同伴支持多样性的态度会增加包容性,减少成绩差距。

Exposure to peers' pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Governors State University, University Park, IL, USA.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):889-897. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5
PMID:32601460
Abstract

There is a dearth of empirically validated pro-diversity methods that effectively create a more inclusive social climate. We developed two scalable interventions that target people's perceptions of social norms by communicating to them that their peers hold pro-diversity attitudes and engage in inclusive behaviours. We tested the interventions in six randomized controlled trials at a large public university in the United States (total n = 2,490). Non-marginalized students exposed to our interventions reported more positive attitudes toward outgroups and greater appreciation of diversity, whereas marginalized students had an increased sense of belonging, reported being treated more inclusively by their peers and earned better grades. While many current pro-diversity initiatives focus on raising awareness about the fact that implicit bias and subtle discrimination are widespread, our findings spotlight the importance of drawing people's attention to their peers' pro-diversity values and attitudes to create positive and lasting effects on the social climate.

摘要

目前缺乏经过实证验证的促进多样性的方法,这些方法无法有效地营造出更具包容性的社会氛围。我们开发了两种可扩展的干预措施,通过向人们传达他们的同龄人持有支持多样性的态度并表现出包容性的行为,来改变他们对社会规范的看法。我们在美国一所大型公立大学的六项随机对照试验中测试了这些干预措施(总样本量为 2490 人)。接触我们干预措施的非边缘学生对少数民族群体的态度更加积极,对多样性的欣赏程度也更高,而边缘学生则更有归属感,他们的同龄人对他们更加包容,他们的成绩也更好。虽然许多当前的促进多样性的举措都集中在提高人们对隐性偏见和微妙歧视普遍存在的认识上,但我们的研究结果强调了让人们关注他们的同龄人支持多样性的价值观和态度的重要性,以对社会氛围产生积极和持久的影响。

相似文献

1
Exposure to peers' pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap.接触到同伴支持多样性的态度会增加包容性,减少成绩差距。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):889-897. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Normative Perceptions of Cannabis Use Among European University Students: Associations of Perceived Peer Use and Peer Attitudes With Personal Use and Attitudes.欧洲大学生对大麻使用的规范性认知:同伴使用认知和同伴态度与个人使用及态度的关联
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Sep;77(5):740-8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.740.
3
Is discrimination widespread? Testing assumptions about bias on a university campus.是否存在广泛的歧视?在大学校园里检验关于偏见的假设。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):756-777. doi: 10.1037/xge0000983. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
4
Personal and Perceived Peer Use of and Attitudes Toward Alcohol Among University and College Students in Seven EU Countries: Project SNIPE.七个欧盟国家大学生个人及对同龄人饮酒的认知与态度:SNIPE项目
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 May;76(3):430-8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.430.
5
Development and evaluation of the efficacy of a web-based 'social norms'-intervention for the prevention and reduction of substance use in a cluster-controlled trial conducted at eight German universities.在德国八所大学进行的一项整群对照试验中,基于网络的“社会规范”干预措施用于预防和减少物质使用的开发与效果评估。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 11;16:252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2898-z.
6
Unseen disadvantage: how American universities' focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students.未被看见的劣势:美国大学对独立性的重视如何削弱第一代大学生的学业表现。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1178-97. doi: 10.1037/a0027143. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
Personal and perceived peer use and attitudes towards use of non-prescribed prescription sedatives and sleeping pills among university students in seven European countries.七个欧洲国家大学生中个人和感知到的同伴对非处方处方镇静剂和安眠药的使用及态度。
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
8
Normative misperceptions of tobacco use among university students in seven European countries: baseline findings of the 'Social Norms Intervention for the prevention of Polydrug usE' study.七个欧洲国家大学生对烟草使用的规范性误解:“预防多药滥用的社会规范干预”研究的基线结果
Addict Behav. 2015 Dec;51:158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
9
Parents' and peers' normative influence on adolescents' smoking: results from a Swiss-Italian sample of middle schools students.父母和同伴对青少年吸烟的规范性影响:来自瑞士-意大利中学生样本的结果。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 Jan 21;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0089-2.
10
Driven by context? The interrelated effects of parents, peers, classrooms on development of prejudice among Swedish majority adolescents.受环境驱动?瑞典多数青少年中偏见发展的父母、同伴和课堂的相互影响。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2451-2463. doi: 10.1037/dev0000809. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A wolf in sheep's clothing? The interplay of perceived threat and social norms in hierarchy-maintaining action tendencies towards disadvantaged groups.披着羊皮的狼?对弱势群体维持等级制度的行动倾向中感知到的威胁与社会规范的相互作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12849. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12849.
2
Our ways will not change: Future collective continuity increases present prosocial considerations.我们的方式不会改变:未来的集体延续性会增加当下的亲社会考量。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12847. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12847.
3
Diversity and inclusion have greater support than most Americans think.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating Social-Marketing Insights Into Prejudice Research: Advancing Theory and Demonstrating Real-World Applications.将社会营销洞察融入偏见研究:推进理论并展示实际应用。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):608-629. doi: 10.1177/1745691619896622. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even if It Is Counternormative.动态规范促进可持续行为,即使这种行为与规范背道而驰。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1663-1674. doi: 10.1177/0956797617719950. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
3
Perceived discrimination and poor health: Accounting for self-blame complicates a well-established relationship.
多元化和包容性得到的支持比大多数美国人认为的要多。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76761-8.
4
It's not what you say it's what you do: School diversity ideologies and adolescent mental health and academic engagement.关键不在于你说了什么,而在于你做了什么:学校的多元理念与青少年心理健康及学业投入。
J Res Adolesc. 2025 Mar;35(1):e12998. doi: 10.1111/jora.12998. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
5
Zoom out: An intervention on the virtual learning environment improves minority students' grades in two field experiments in Israel.Zoom out:一项干预虚拟学习环境的措施在以色列的两项实地实验中提高了少数族裔学生的成绩。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2313496121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313496121. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Racial/ethnic minority females smoke more cigarettes after social interaction with others who smoke.在与吸烟的其他人进行社交互动后,少数族裔女性会吸更多的香烟。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2024 May 10:1-18. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2024.2349308.
7
Turning ingroup wounds into bonds: perceptions of gender inequalities predict attitudes toward other minorities.将群体内部的创伤转化为纽带:对性别不平等的认知预测对其他少数群体的态度。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1327262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1327262. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of a Workshop to Break the Bias Habit for Internal Medicine Faculty: A Multisite Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.打破内科教员偏见习惯的研讨会效果:一项多站点集群随机对照研究。
Acad Med. 2023 Oct 1;98(10):1211-1219. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005271. Epub 2023 May 23.
9
Inclusive classroom climate development as the cornerstone of inclusive school building: review and perspectives.营造包容性课堂氛围作为全纳学校建设的基石:综述与展望
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 1;14:1171204. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1171204. eCollection 2023.
10
Trust within human-machine collectives depends on the perceived consensus about cooperative norms.人机集体中的信任取决于对合作规范的共识感知。
Nat Commun. 2023 May 30;14(1):3108. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38592-5.
感知到的歧视与健康状况不佳:将自责因素考虑在内会使一种既定关系变得复杂。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;153:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.053. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools.冲突气候的转变:一项针对56所学校的社交网络实验
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):566-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514483113. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
5
Changing Norms to Change Behavior.改变规范以改变行为。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:339-61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
The new statistics: why and how.新的统计数据:原因和方法。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
7
Presumed fair: ironic effects of organizational diversity structures.表面公平:组织多样性结构的讽刺效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar;104(3):504-19. doi: 10.1037/a0030838. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
8
Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: how motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice.反偏见信息的反讽效应:动机干预如何既能减少(也能增加)偏见。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Dec;22(12):1472-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611427918. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
10
Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice.减少偏见:哪些方法有效?对研究与实践的综述及评估。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:339-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607.