• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多元化和包容性得到的支持比大多数美国人认为的要多。

Diversity and inclusion have greater support than most Americans think.

作者信息

Isenberg Naomi, Brauer Markus

机构信息

Diversity Science, Clackamas, Oregon, USA.

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76761-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-76761-8
PMID:39562565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11576875/
Abstract

In a series of large-scale studies (N = 5,448) we show that Americans across many different demographic categories vastly underestimate their fellow Americans' support for diversity and inclusion. Trump voters were particularly inaccurate when their task was to estimate prevalent attitudes among Biden voters. Our results show that the degree of underestimation of others' support for diversity and inclusion predicts the frequency of conversations about diversity, reduced intentions to behave inclusively, and a smaller likelihood of confronting discrimination. Our last two studies (N = 723) demonstrate that it is possible to correct people's misperceptions through "social norms messaging," i.e., communications about statistics from national opinion polls highlighting that a majority of Americans are pro diversity. Our findings suggest that once people form accurate impressions of the high percentage of Americans who support diversity and inclusion, they will be more likely to be in favor of pro-diversity initiatives, behave more inclusively, and endorse policies aimed at reducing racial disparities.

摘要

在一系列大规模研究(N = 5448)中,我们发现,许多不同人口类别中的美国人极大地低估了其他美国人对多元化和包容性的支持。当特朗普选民的任务是估计拜登选民中的普遍态度时,他们尤其不准确。我们的研究结果表明,对他人对多元化和包容性支持的低估程度预示着关于多元化的对话频率、包容性行为意图的降低以及面对歧视的可能性较小。我们的最后两项研究(N = 723)表明,通过“社会规范信息传递”,即传达全国民意调查的统计数据,突出表明大多数美国人支持多元化,有可能纠正人们的错误认知。我们的研究结果表明,一旦人们对支持多元化和包容性的美国人的高比例形成准确印象,他们将更有可能支持支持多元化的倡议,表现得更具包容性,并认可旨在减少种族差异的政策。

相似文献

1
Diversity and inclusion have greater support than most Americans think.多元化和包容性得到的支持比大多数美国人认为的要多。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76761-8.
2
Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half.美国人低估了民众对气候政策的支持率,近一半人都生活在这种错误的社会现实中。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 23;13(1):4779. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32412-y.
3
Exposure to peers' pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap.接触到同伴支持多样性的态度会增加包容性,减少成绩差距。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):889-897. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
4
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
5
Misperceived eating norms: Assessing pluralistic ignorance in the food environment.误解的饮食规范:评估食物环境中的多元化无知。
Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106284. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106284. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
On the precipice of a "majority-minority" America: perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans' political ideology.在美国即将进入“多数少数族裔”的时代:白种美国人感受到种族人口结构变化带来的地位威胁,这影响了他们的政治意识形态。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jun;25(6):1189-97. doi: 10.1177/0956797614527113. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
7
#NotAllWhites: Liberal-Leaning White Americans Racially Disidentify and Increase Support for Racial Equity.并非所有白人:持自由派倾向的美国白人在种族上自我认同度降低,并增加对种族平等的支持。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Nov;47(11):1612-1632. doi: 10.1177/0146167220987988. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
The misperception of organizational racial progress toward diversity, equity, and inclusion.对组织在多样性、公平性和包容性方面种族进步的误解。
Am Psychol. 2024 May-Jun;79(4):581-592. doi: 10.1037/amp0001309.
9
Widespread misperceptions of long-term attitude change.广泛存在的对长期态度改变的误解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 15;119(11):e2107260119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107260119. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Younger Americans are less politically polarized than older Americans about climate policies (but not about other policy domains).美国年轻人在气候政策方面比老年人的政治分歧更小(但在其他政策领域并非如此)。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0302434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302434. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Local TV News Coverage of Racial Disparities in COVID-19 During the First Wave of the Pandemic, March-June 2020.2020年3月至6月大流行第一波期间地方电视台对新冠疫情中种族差异的新闻报道。
Race Soc Probl. 2023;15(2):201-213. doi: 10.1007/s12552-022-09372-5. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Progress and push-back: How the killings of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd impacted public discourse on race and racism on Twitter.进步与阻力:阿马杜·阿尔贝里、布雷娜·泰勒和乔治·弗洛伊德之死如何影响了推特上关于种族和种族主义的公众讨论。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep 10;15:100922. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100922. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Exposure to peers' pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap.
接触到同伴支持多样性的态度会增加包容性,减少成绩差距。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):889-897. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
4
The sense of social influence: pluralistic ignorance in climate change: Social factors play key roles in human behavior. Individuals tend to underestimate how much others worry about climate change. This may inhibit them from taking collective climate action.社会影响感:气候变化中的多元化无知:社会因素在人类行为中起着关键作用。个人往往低估了其他人对气候变化的担忧程度。这可能会抑制他们采取集体气候行动。
EMBO Rep. 2018 Nov;19(11). doi: 10.15252/embr.201847185. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Experimental Evidence for Minorities' Hesitancy in Reporting Their Opinions: The Roles of Optimal Distinctiveness Needs and Normative Influence.少数群体在表达意见时犹豫不决的实验证据:最优独特性需求和规范性影响的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;40(7):872-883. doi: 10.1177/0146167214528990. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
6
Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: A statewide campaign.社交媒体营销在减少酒后驾车方面的有效性:全州范围的运动。
Addict Behav. 2010 Oct;35(10):866-74. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
7
The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms.社会规范的建构力、破坏力和重建力。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
8
American = White?美国人 = 白人?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;88(3):447-66. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447.
9
Social influence: compliance and conformity.社会影响:顺从与从众。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
10
Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.负面信息对大脑的影响更为显著:评价分类中的负面偏向。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Oct;75(4):887-900. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.887.