Al Aseri Zohair A, Al Hussein Reema M, Malabarey Mohammed A, AlYahya Bader A, Al Moaiqel Faisal A, Al Ansari Mariam A, Alrajhi Khaled N
College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.
Saudi Med J. 2020 Jul;41(7):698-702. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.7.25162.
To determine the ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter (USG-CVC) placement rate of emergency physicians (EPs) in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
A cross-sectional survey study regarding the respondents' demographic profiles, formal and informal training in USG-CVC placement, experiences, and attitudes towards the procedure was emailed to all EPs registered with the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) between October and December 2018.
In total, 234/350 SCFHS-registered EPs completed the survey; the response rate was 66.9%. Most respondents (70.5%) were board-certified in emergency medicine (EM). Ninety percent indicated that US device for CVC placement assistance was available. Most EPs (78.2%) had performed USG-CVC placement; the US usage rate correlated significantly with recent graduation from residency (p=0.048). In total, 83.3% received formal training during residency. Of the 234 respondents, 53.8% felt extremely comfortable with CVC placement with USG and 19.7% without USG (p less than 0.01). Nevertheless, most respondents desired further USG-CVC training.
Despite existing evidence and a consensus on its superiority over the landmark technique, USG-CVC placement has not been adopted by a small proportion of EPs into clinical practice. Formal training, education, and institutional provision of permanent onsite US machines may address any barriers.
确定沙特阿拉伯王国急诊医生(EP)进行超声引导下中心静脉置管(USG-CVC)的比例。
2018年10月至12月期间,通过电子邮件向沙特卫生专业委员会(SCFHS)注册的所有急诊医生发送了一项横断面调查研究,内容涉及受访者的人口统计学资料、USG-CVC置管的正规和非正规培训、经验以及对该操作的态度。
共有234/350名SCFHS注册的急诊医生完成了调查;回复率为66.9%。大多数受访者(70.5%)拥有急诊医学(EM)专业认证。90%的人表示有用于CVC置管辅助的超声设备。大多数急诊医生(78.2%)进行过USG-CVC置管;超声使用率与最近完成住院医师培训显著相关(p=0.048)。总共有83.3%的人在住院医师培训期间接受过正规培训。在234名受访者中,53.8%的人对使用超声引导进行CVC置管感到非常自在,19.7%的人对不使用超声引导感到自在(p小于0.01)。然而,大多数受访者希望进一步接受USG-CVC培训。
尽管有证据表明超声引导下中心静脉置管优于标志性技术且已达成共识,但仍有一小部分急诊医生未将其应用于临床实践。正规培训、教育以及机构提供永久性现场超声设备可能会消除相关障碍。