Suppr超能文献

“男性略有不同”-学术医学中的赞助和性别:一项定性研究。

"It's a Little Different for Men"-Sponsorship and Gender in Academic Medicine: a Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Ave./Mason F. Lord Bldg Center Tower, Suite 2300, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05956-2. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women remain underrepresented in top leadership positions in academic medicine. In business settings, a person with power and influence actively supporting the career advancement of a junior person is referred to as a sponsor and sponsorship programs have been used to diversify leadership. Little is known about how sponsorship functions in academic medicine.

OBJECTIVE

To explore perceptions of sponsorship and its relationship to gender and career advancement in academic medicine.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semi-structured, one-on-one interviews with sponsors and protégés.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve sponsors (clinical department chairs) and 11 protégés (participants of a school of medicine executive leadership program [N = 23]) at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

KEY RESULTS

All sponsors were men and all were professors, six of the 11 protégés were women, and four of the 23 participants were underrepresented minorities in medicine. We identified three themes: (1) people (how and who): women seek out and receive sponsorship differently; (2) process (faster and further): sponsorship provides an extra boost, especially for women; and (3) politics and culture (playing favorites and paying it forward): sponsorship and fairness. Informants acknowledge that sponsorship provides an extra boost for career advancement especially for women. Sponsors and protégés differ in their perceptions of how sponsorship happens. Informants describe gender differences in how sponsorship is experienced and specifically noted that women were less likely to actively seek out sponsorship and be identified as protégés compared to men. Informants describe a tension between sponsorship and core academic values such as transparency, fairness, and merit.

CONCLUSION

Sponsorship is perceived to be critical to high-level advancement and is experienced differently by women. Increased understanding of how sponsorship works in academic medicine may empower individual faculty to utilize this professional relationship for career advancement and provide institutions with a strategy to diversify top leadership positions.

摘要

背景

女性在学术医学领域的高层领导职位中仍然代表性不足。在商业环境中,一个拥有权力和影响力的人积极支持初级人员的职业发展,被称为赞助人,并且已经使用赞助计划来使领导力多样化。关于学术医学中的赞助作用,人们知之甚少。

目的

探讨在学术医学中对赞助的看法及其与性别和职业发展的关系。

设计

使用半结构化的一对一访谈对赞助人和被赞助人进行定性研究。

参与者

约翰霍普金斯医学院的 12 名赞助人(临床系主任)和 11 名被赞助人(医学院执行领导计划的参与者[N=23])。

主要结果

所有的赞助人都是男性,都是教授,11 名被赞助人中的 6 名是女性,23 名参与者中有 4 名是医学领域的少数族裔。我们确定了三个主题:(1)人(如何和谁):女性寻求和接受赞助的方式不同;(2)过程(更快和更远):赞助提供了额外的推动力,尤其是对女性而言;(3)政治和文化(偏爱和回报):赞助和公平。知情人承认,赞助对职业发展,特别是对女性而言,是一个额外的推动力。赞助人和被赞助人对赞助是如何发生的看法不同。知情人描述了性别差异在经历赞助方面的差异,特别是指出与男性相比,女性不太可能主动寻求赞助并被确定为被赞助人。知情人描述了赞助与学术核心价值观(如透明度、公平和功绩)之间的紧张关系。

结论

赞助被认为对高层晋升至关重要,而且女性对此的体验不同。增加对学术医学中赞助作用的理解,可以使个人教师能够利用这种专业关系来促进职业发展,并为机构提供多元化高层领导职位的策略。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to the Success of Black Academic Physicians.黑人学术医生成功的障碍与促进因素
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct 17. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02201-y.
4
Gender Differences in the Path to Medical School Deanship.性别差异与走向医学院院长之路。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420570. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20570.
8

本文引用的文献

1
The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs.性骚扰项目的承诺与危险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 18;116(25):12255-12260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818477116. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
Promoting academic careers of women in medicine.促进医学领域女性的学术职业发展。
Maturitas. 2017 Feb;96:114-115. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验