Suppr超能文献

学术医学发展的障碍:多数男性与其他教员之间的认知差距。

Barriers to Advancement in Academic Medicine: the Perception Gap Between Majority Men and Other Faculty.

作者信息

Bateman Lori Brand, Heider Laura, Vickers Selwyn M, Anderson William A, Hood Anthony C, Jones Evelyn, Ott Corilyn, Eady Sequoya, Fouad Mona N

机构信息

School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Division of Preventive Medicine, UAB School of Medicine, 1717 11th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1937-1943. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06515-5. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the American Association of Medical Colleges, women comprise 26% of full professors and 19% of medical school department chairs. African American and Latino faculty comprise 4.6% of full professors and 6.9% of department chairs.

OBJECTIVE

Because of the lack of representation of women and racial/ethnic minority faculty at the highest levels of academic medicine, this study examines the perceptions of barriers to advancement by men and women academic medical school faculty of differing races and ethnicities to explore potential differences in perceptions by demographic group.

DESIGN

Semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted between July and September 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

In order to give all faculty a chance to participate, faculty of all ranks and specialties were recruited from one southeastern medical school to participate in the study.

APPROACH

Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by 3 members of the research team using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Participants were organized into 4 groups for analysis-underrepresented in medicine (URiM) women, majority women, URiM men, majority men.

KEY RESULTS

Sixty-four faculty consented to participate in the study (56.2% women, 34.4% URiM). Subthemes were grouped under three main themes: Perceptions of Barriers to Advancement of Women Faculty, Perceptions of Barriers to Advancement of African American and Latino Faculty, and Perceptions of the Institutional Climate for Diversity. Majority men tended to voice distinctly different perspectives than the other three demographic groups, with the most notable differences between majority men and URiM women. Majority  men tended to suggest that the advancement of women and URiM faculty was acceptable or getting better, the lack of URiM faculty in leadership was due mainly to pipeline issues, and women choose not to advance to leadership positions.

CONCLUSION

We found that participant gender and race/ethnicity shaped perspectives of medical school faculty advancement in distinct ways.

摘要

背景

根据美国医学院协会的数据,女性占正教授人数的26%,占医学院系主任人数的19%。非裔美国人和拉丁裔教员分别占正教授人数的4.6%和系主任人数的6.9%。

目的

由于女性和少数族裔教员在学术医学的最高层缺乏代表性,本研究调查了不同种族和族裔的男女学术医学院教员对晋升障碍的看法,以探讨不同人口群体在看法上的潜在差异。

设计

2017年7月至9月进行了半结构化一对一访谈。

参与者

为了让所有教员都有机会参与,从一所东南部医学院招募了各职级和专业的教员参与研究。

方法

访谈进行了录音、转录,由研究团队的3名成员采用归纳法进行主题分析。参与者被分为4组进行分析——医学领域代表性不足(URiM)的女性、多数群体女性、URiM男性、多数群体男性。

主要结果

64名教员同意参与研究(56.2%为女性,34.4%为URiM)。子主题分为三个主要主题:女性教员晋升障碍的看法、非裔美国人和拉丁裔教员晋升障碍的看法、对多元化机构氛围 的看法。多数群体男性的观点往往与其他三个人口群体明显不同,多数群体男性与URiM女性之间的差异最为显著。多数群体男性倾向于认为女性和URiM教员的晋升是可以接受的或正在改善,领导层中缺乏URiM教员主要是由于人才储备问题,而且女性选择不晋升到领导职位。

结论

我们发现,参与者的性别和种族/族裔以不同的方式塑造了医学院教员对晋升的看法。

相似文献

1
Barriers to Advancement in Academic Medicine: the Perception Gap Between Majority Men and Other Faculty.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1937-1943. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06515-5. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Gender, Race, and Ethnicity of US Academic Ophthalmology Faculty and Department Chairs From 1966 to 2021.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 1;142(8):742-748. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2375.
3
Minority faculty voices on diversity in academic medicine: perspectives from one school.
Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):781-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31817ec002.
4
Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Diversity Among Academic Surgical Leaders in the US.
JAMA Surg. 2023 Dec 1;158(12):1328-1334. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4777.
5
Faculty knowledge, actions, and perceptions of sponsorship: an institutional survey study.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2218665. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2218665.
6
An innovative approach to career development and promotion of diverse faculty.
J Hosp Med. 2023 Mar;18(3):234-238. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13039. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
7
Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Apr;19(4):799-805. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1591.
9
Limitations in Faculty Advancement for Underrepresented Groups in Academic Otolaryngology.
Laryngoscope. 2024 Apr;134(4):1625-1632. doi: 10.1002/lary.31110. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
10
Satisfaction of Women Faculty in Academic Medicine.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Feb;33(2):132-140. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0152. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Interventions to Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the United States Healthcare Workforce.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 May 19;12:23821205251333034. doi: 10.1177/23821205251333034. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Increasing diversity in the nutrition, obesity, and diabetes biomedical workforce: the BRIDGES consortium.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Feb;121(2):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
Institutional penalty: mentoring, service, perceived discrimination and its impacts on the health and academic careers of Latino faculty.
Ethn Racial Stud. 2023;46(6):1132-1157. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2022.2160651. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Understanding the Experiences of Black Women Medical Students and Residents: A Narrative Review.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;10:879135. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879135. eCollection 2022.
6
Perspectives on Anti-Black Racism and Mitigation Strategies Among Faculty Experts at Academic Medical Centers.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228534. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8534.

本文引用的文献

1
Racism and Health in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 6;173(7):556-557. doi: 10.7326/M20-4195. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
EXPLORING EQUALITY IN LEADERSHIP ROLES.
Physician Leadersh J. 2017 May;4(3):36-39.
3
Trends in the Motherhood Wage Penalty and Fatherhood Wage Premium for Low, Middle, and High Earners.
Demography. 2018 Oct;55(5):1663-1680. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0712-5.
4
6
7
Systemic racism and U.S. health care.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;103:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.006.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验