Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, USA.
Department of Fisheries and Oceans, St. John's, NL, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2020 Sep;23(9):1360-1369. doi: 10.1111/ele.13563. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Variation in social environment can mitigate risks and rewards associated with occupying a particular patch. We aim to integrate Ideal Free Distribution (IFD) and Geometry of the Selfish Herd (GSH) to address an apparent conflict in their predictions of equal mean fitness between patches (IFD) and declining fitness benefits within a patch (GSH). We tested these hypotheses in a socio-spatial context using individual caribou that were aggregated or disaggregated during calving and varied in their annual reproductive success (ARS). We then tested individual consistency of these spatial tactics. We reveal that two socio-spatial tactics accorded similar mean ARS (IFD); however, ARS for aggregated individuals declined near the periphery (GSH). Individuals near the aggregation periphery exhibited flexibility, whereas others were consistent. The integration of classical theories through a contemporary lens of consistent individual differences provides evidence for an integrated GSH and IFD strategy that may represent an evolutionary stable state.
社会环境的变化可以减轻占据特定斑块所带来的风险和回报。我们的目的是整合理想自由分布(IFD)和自私羊群的几何结构(GSH),以解决它们在预测斑块间平均适应度相等(IFD)和斑块内适应度收益下降(GSH)方面的明显冲突。我们在一个社会空间背景下使用个体驯鹿进行了测试,这些驯鹿在产犊期间聚集或分散,其年度繁殖成功率(ARS)也有所不同。然后,我们测试了这些空间策略的个体一致性。我们发现,两种社会空间策略的平均ARS 相似(IFD);然而,聚集个体的 ARS 在边缘附近下降(GSH)。聚集边缘附近的个体表现出灵活性,而其他个体则保持一致。通过现代视角下的个体差异的一致性来整合经典理论,为整合的 GSH 和 IFD 策略提供了证据,该策略可能代表一种进化稳定状态。