• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期以来,美洲温带和热带地区陆地生态系统多样性的范围和当前保护都在减少。

Long-term loss in extent and current protection of terrestrial ecosystem diversity in the temperate and tropical Americas.

机构信息

NatureServe, Boulder, CO, United States of America.

EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0234960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234960. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0234960
PMID:32603348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7326196/
Abstract

Documenting changes in ecosystem extent and protection is essential to understanding status of biodiversity and related ecosystem services and have direct applications to measuring Essential Biodiversity Variables, Targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. We developed both potential and current distribution maps of terrestrial ecosystem types for the temperate and tropical Americas; with "potential" estimating where a type would likely occur today had there not been prior land conversion for modern land uses. We utilized a hierarchical classification to describe and map natural ecosystem types at six levels of thematic detail, with lower thematic levels defining more units each with narrower floristic range than upper levels. Current land use/land cover was derived using available global data on human land use intensity and combined with the potential distribution maps to estimate long-term change in extent for each ecosystem type. We also assessed representation of ecosystem types within protected areas as defined by IUCN I-VI land status categories. Of the 749 ecosystem types assessed, represented at 5th (n = 315) vs. 6th (n = 433) levels of the classification hierarchy, 5 types (1.6%) and 31 types (7.1%), respectively, have lost >90% of their potential extent. Some 66 types (20.9%) and 141 types (32.5%), respectively, have lost >50% of their potential extent; thus, crossing thresholds of Vulnerable status under IUCN Red List criterion A3. For ecosystem type representation within IUCN protected area classes, with reference to potential extent of each type, 111 (45.3%) and 125 (28.8%) of types, respectively, have higher representation (>17%) than CBD 2020 targets. Twelve types (3.8%) and 23 (5.3%) of types, respectively, are represented with <1% within protected areas. We illustrate an option for visualizing and reporting on CBD targets (2020 and proposed post-2020) for ecosystem representativeness using both potential extent as a baseline.

摘要

记录生态系统范围和保护的变化对于理解生物多样性及其相关生态系统服务的现状至关重要,并且对衡量生物多样性关键变量、《生物多样性公约》(CBD)下的目标以及《IUCN 生态系统红色名录》具有直接的应用价值。我们为美洲的温带和热带地区开发了陆地生态系统类型的潜在和当前分布图;“潜在”是指在没有现代土地利用的土地转换的情况下,一个生态系统类型今天可能会出现的位置。我们利用层次分类法来描述和绘制六个主题细节级别的自然生态系统类型,其中较低的主题级别定义了每个单位的更多单元,每个单元的植物区系范围都比上一级窄。当前的土地利用/土地覆盖情况是利用现有的关于人类土地利用强度的全球数据得出的,并与潜在分布图结合,以估算每个生态系统类型的长期范围变化。我们还评估了根据 IUCN I-VI 土地状况类别定义的保护区内生态系统类型的代表性。在所评估的 749 个生态系统类型中,在分类层次结构的第 5 级(n = 315)和第 6 级(n = 433)中分别有 5 个(1.6%)和 31 个(7.1%)类型损失了超过 90%的潜在范围。大约有 66 个类型(20.9%)和 141 个类型(32.5%)分别损失了超过 50%的潜在范围;因此,根据 IUCN 红色名录标准 A3,达到了脆弱状态的阈值。关于生态系统类型在 IUCN 保护区类别的代表性,参考每个类型的潜在范围,分别有 111 个(45.3%)和 125 个(28.8%)类型的代表性(>17%)高于 CBD 2020 目标。分别有 12 个类型(3.8%)和 23 个类型(5.3%)的代表性在保护区内低于 1%。我们展示了一种使用潜在范围作为基线,可视化和报告 CBD 代表性目标(2020 年和 2020 年后提议)的选项。

相似文献

1
Long-term loss in extent and current protection of terrestrial ecosystem diversity in the temperate and tropical Americas.长期以来,美洲温带和热带地区陆地生态系统多样性的范围和当前保护都在减少。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0234960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234960. eCollection 2020.
2
Contributions of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems to risk-based design and management of protected and conserved areas in Africa.IUCN 红色名录生态系统对非洲基于风险的保护和保护区设计与管理的贡献。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Jun;38(3):e14169. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14169. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
3
Climate and land-use interactively shape butterfly diversity in tropical rainforest and savanna ecosystems of southwestern China.气候和土地利用在中国西南地区的热带雨林和稀树草原生态系统中交互作用,塑造了蝴蝶的多样性。
Insect Sci. 2021 Aug;28(4):1109-1120. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12824. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism.全球保护区的扩张受到预计土地利用和地方主义的影响。
Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):383-6. doi: 10.1038/nature14032. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
5
Predicting plant diversity patterns in Madagascar: understanding the effects of climate and land cover change in a biodiversity hotspot.预测马达加斯加的植物多样性模式:了解生物多样性热点地区气候和土地覆盖变化的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0122721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122721. eCollection 2015.
6
A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.《世界自然保护联盟生态系统红色名录标准应用实用指南》
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140003. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0003.
7
Producing context specific land cover and land use maps of human-modified tropical forest landscapes for infectious disease applications.为传染病应用制作具有特定上下文的热带人工林景观的土地覆盖和土地利用图。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:168772. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168772. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
8
A new ecosystem-based land classification of Iran for conservation goals.伊朗基于生态系统的新土地分类,旨在保护目标。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Feb 18;192(3):182. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-8145-1.
9
Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century.二十一世纪的基于区域的保护。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):217-227. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
10
The Tropical Ecology, Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) Network: An early warning system for tropical rain forests.热带生态学、评估和监测(TEAM)网络:热带雨林的早期预警系统。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:914-923. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.146. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving species status assessments under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and implications for multispecies conservation challenges worldwide.改善美国濒危物种法案下的物种状况评估及其对全球多物种保护挑战的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Dec;35(6):1715-1724. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13777. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Protected area targets post-2020.2020年后的保护区目标。
Science. 2019 Apr 19;364(6437):239-241. doi: 10.1126/science.aav6886. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation.全球陆地人类足迹 16 年来的变化及其对生物多样性保护的影响。
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 23;7:12558. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12558.
3
The performance and potential of protected areas.保护区的表现和潜力。
Nature. 2014 Nov 6;515(7525):67-73. doi: 10.1038/nature13947.
4
Representation of ecological systems within the protected areas network of the Continental United States.美国大陆保护区网络内的生态系统表现。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054689. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
5
Ecology. Essential biodiversity variables.生态学。基本生物多样性变量。
Science. 2013 Jan 18;339(6117):277-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1229931.
6
Land cover mapping of the tropical savanna region in Brazil.巴西热带稀树草原地区的土地覆盖制图。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Jul;166(1-4):113-24. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0988-4. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
7
Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.灭绝风险的量化:国际自然保护联盟对受威胁物种的分类系统。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Dec;22(6):1424-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01044.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25.