NatureServe, Boulder, CO, United States of America.
EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0234960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234960. eCollection 2020.
Documenting changes in ecosystem extent and protection is essential to understanding status of biodiversity and related ecosystem services and have direct applications to measuring Essential Biodiversity Variables, Targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. We developed both potential and current distribution maps of terrestrial ecosystem types for the temperate and tropical Americas; with "potential" estimating where a type would likely occur today had there not been prior land conversion for modern land uses. We utilized a hierarchical classification to describe and map natural ecosystem types at six levels of thematic detail, with lower thematic levels defining more units each with narrower floristic range than upper levels. Current land use/land cover was derived using available global data on human land use intensity and combined with the potential distribution maps to estimate long-term change in extent for each ecosystem type. We also assessed representation of ecosystem types within protected areas as defined by IUCN I-VI land status categories. Of the 749 ecosystem types assessed, represented at 5th (n = 315) vs. 6th (n = 433) levels of the classification hierarchy, 5 types (1.6%) and 31 types (7.1%), respectively, have lost >90% of their potential extent. Some 66 types (20.9%) and 141 types (32.5%), respectively, have lost >50% of their potential extent; thus, crossing thresholds of Vulnerable status under IUCN Red List criterion A3. For ecosystem type representation within IUCN protected area classes, with reference to potential extent of each type, 111 (45.3%) and 125 (28.8%) of types, respectively, have higher representation (>17%) than CBD 2020 targets. Twelve types (3.8%) and 23 (5.3%) of types, respectively, are represented with <1% within protected areas. We illustrate an option for visualizing and reporting on CBD targets (2020 and proposed post-2020) for ecosystem representativeness using both potential extent as a baseline.
记录生态系统范围和保护的变化对于理解生物多样性及其相关生态系统服务的现状至关重要,并且对衡量生物多样性关键变量、《生物多样性公约》(CBD)下的目标以及《IUCN 生态系统红色名录》具有直接的应用价值。我们为美洲的温带和热带地区开发了陆地生态系统类型的潜在和当前分布图;“潜在”是指在没有现代土地利用的土地转换的情况下,一个生态系统类型今天可能会出现的位置。我们利用层次分类法来描述和绘制六个主题细节级别的自然生态系统类型,其中较低的主题级别定义了每个单位的更多单元,每个单元的植物区系范围都比上一级窄。当前的土地利用/土地覆盖情况是利用现有的关于人类土地利用强度的全球数据得出的,并与潜在分布图结合,以估算每个生态系统类型的长期范围变化。我们还评估了根据 IUCN I-VI 土地状况类别定义的保护区内生态系统类型的代表性。在所评估的 749 个生态系统类型中,在分类层次结构的第 5 级(n = 315)和第 6 级(n = 433)中分别有 5 个(1.6%)和 31 个(7.1%)类型损失了超过 90%的潜在范围。大约有 66 个类型(20.9%)和 141 个类型(32.5%)分别损失了超过 50%的潜在范围;因此,根据 IUCN 红色名录标准 A3,达到了脆弱状态的阈值。关于生态系统类型在 IUCN 保护区类别的代表性,参考每个类型的潜在范围,分别有 111 个(45.3%)和 125 个(28.8%)类型的代表性(>17%)高于 CBD 2020 目标。分别有 12 个类型(3.8%)和 23 个类型(5.3%)的代表性在保护区内低于 1%。我们展示了一种使用潜在范围作为基线,可视化和报告 CBD 代表性目标(2020 年和 2020 年后提议)的选项。