• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于规则的理赔数据库数据质量评估

Rules Based Data Quality Assessment on Claims Database.

作者信息

Gadde Mary A, Wang Zhan, Zozus Meredith, Talburt John B, Greer Melody L

机构信息

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Littlerock, Arkansas, USA.

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 26;272:350-353. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200567.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI200567
PMID:32604674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7899162/
Abstract

Data quality problems in coded clinical and administrative data have persisted ever since diagnoses and procedures were first coded and used for healthcare billing. These data are used in clinical decision-making introducing a route for iatrogenesis. As we share data on regional Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) and include them in electronic health records the potential for harm may be increased. To study this problem we applied rules-based data quality checks that have been previously tested on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data on a limited set of aggregated claims data. Medicaid claims data was used exclusively. CMS has clear guidelines for claims submitted for Medicaid patients and penalties are incurred for erroneous claims, which should ensure a high quality data source, however reports of low and varying sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of coded diagnoses are common. To identify data quality defects in claims data in a state All Payer Claims Dataset (APCD) we applied and evaluated a recently developed rules-based data quality assessment and monitoring system for Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to test effectiveness in claims data. These rules, that are feasible for "All Payer Claims data" and Medicaid data are identified, applied and the Data Quality issue results are produced.

摘要

自从诊断和程序首次被编码并用于医疗计费以来,编码后的临床和管理数据中的数据质量问题一直存在。这些数据用于临床决策,从而引入了医源性途径。随着我们在区域健康信息交换(HIE)上共享数据并将其纳入电子健康记录,危害的可能性可能会增加。为了研究这个问题,我们应用了基于规则的数据质量检查,这些检查先前已在有限的汇总索赔数据集的电子健康记录(EHR)数据上进行过测试。仅使用了医疗补助索赔数据。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)对为医疗补助患者提交的索赔有明确的指导方针,错误索赔会受到处罚,这应确保有高质量的数据源,然而,编码诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值较低且各不相同的报告很常见。为了识别一个州的全支付方索赔数据集(APCD)中索赔数据的数据质量缺陷,我们应用并评估了一个最近开发的用于电子健康记录(EHR)数据的基于规则的数据质量评估和监测系统,以测试其在索赔数据中的有效性。确定了适用于“全支付方索赔数据”和医疗补助数据的这些规则,加以应用并得出数据质量问题的结果。

相似文献

1
Rules Based Data Quality Assessment on Claims Database.基于规则的理赔数据库数据质量评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 26;272:350-353. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200567.
2
Comparison of Electronic Health Record-Based and Claims-Based Diabetes Care Quality Measures: Causes of Discrepancies.基于电子健康记录和理赔的糖尿病护理质量衡量指标的比较:差异的原因。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2988-3006. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12819. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Enhancing PCORnet Clinical Research Network data completeness by integrating multistate insurance claims with electronic health records in a cloud environment aligned with CMS security and privacy requirements.在符合 CMS 安全和隐私要求的云环境中,通过将多州保险索赔与电子健康记录相集成,提高 PCORnet 临床研究网络数据的完整性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):660-670. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab269.
4
Electronic health records vs Medicaid claims: completeness of diabetes preventive care data in community health centers.电子健康记录与医疗补助索赔:社区卫生中心中糖尿病预防保健数据的完整性。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;9(4):351-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1279.
5
Agreement of Medicaid claims and electronic health records for assessing preventive care quality among adults.评估成年人预防保健质量的医疗补助索赔和电子健康记录的一致性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):720-4. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002333. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
6
Novel Data Linkages to Characterize Palliative and End-Of-Life Care: Challenges and Considerations.新型数据关联方法用于描述缓和医疗和临终关怀:挑战与思考。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):851-856. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
7
Identifying Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Using Algorithms Applied to US Integrated Delivery Network Healthcare Data.使用应用于美国综合交付网络医疗保健数据的算法识别复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
8
Claims-based studies of oral glucose-lowering medications can achieve balance in critical clinical variables only observed in electronic health records.基于索赔的口服降血糖药物研究仅能在电子健康记录中观察到关键临床变量的平衡。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):974-984. doi: 10.1111/dom.13184. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Validation of infant immunization billing codes in administrative data.行政数据中婴儿免疫接种计费代码的验证
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(7):1840-7. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1043499.
10
How much can we trust electronic health record data?电子健康记录数据的可信度有多高?
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Sep;8(3):100444. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100444. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.临床数据生命周期中数据质量面临的挑战:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e60709. doi: 10.2196/60709.
2
Electronic Health Record Data Quality and Performance Assessments: Scoping Review.电子健康记录数据质量和性能评估:范围综述。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 6;12:e58130. doi: 10.2196/58130.

本文引用的文献

1
Transparency in real-world evidence (RWE) studies to build confidence for decision-making: Reporting RWE research in diabetes.真实世界证据(RWE)研究的透明度:建立决策信心——以糖尿病为例报告 RWE 研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Apr;22 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):45-59. doi: 10.1111/dom.13918.
2
Rule-Based Data Quality Assessment and Monitoring System in Healthcare Facilities.医疗机构中基于规则的数据质量评估与监测系统
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:460-467.
3
USING CLAIMS DATA FOR EVIDENCE GENERATION IN MANAGED ENTRY AGREEMENTS.利用理赔数据在准入管理协议中生成证据
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(1-2):69-77. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000131. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Data quality probes-exploiting and improving the quality of electronic patient record data and patient care.数据质量探测——利用并提高电子病历数据质量与患者护理水平。
Int J Med Inform. 2002 Dec 18;68(1-3):91-8. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00068-0.