Commonwealth Medicine Division, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts.
Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
Postpartum health care among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities has not been well studied. This study uses administrative claims to compare postpartum outpatient visits among women with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Massachusetts All Payers Claims Database 2012-2015 was used to identify women with intellectual and developmental disabilities and a live birth during 2012-2014, matched by infant birth year to 3 women without intellectual and developmental disabilities. Women were followed up for 1 year after delivery. Analyses were conducted in 2019. Poisson regression compared guideline-concordant postpartum and other outpatient visits during the early (21-56 days after delivery) and late (57-365 days after delivery) periods. Types of nonpostpartum care visits were examined.
Overall, 962 and 2,886 women with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities, respectively, comprised the sample. Among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities, 23.9% had a postpartum visit in the early and 33.3% in the late postpartum periods, compared with 25.2% and 32.1% of women without intellectual and developmental disabilities who had visits in the early and late postpartum periods, respectively (p=0.49, 0.59). Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities were more likely to have other outpatient visits than those without intellectual and developmental disabilities, both in the early (63.1% vs 40.3%, adjusted RR=1.42, 95% CI=1.28, 1.58, p<0.001) and late (94.2% vs 82.3%, RR=1.11, 95% CI=1.08, 1.14, p=0.008) postpartum periods. Ancillary services, home health services, and alcohol/drug-related visits were much more common among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are equally likely to receive guideline-concordant postpartum visits and more likely to have other outpatient visits than other women. Further research is needed to evaluate visit quality and identify best practices to support mothers with intellectual and developmental disabilities during the postpartum period.
针对智障和发育障碍女性的产后健康护理尚未得到充分研究。本研究使用行政索赔数据比较了智障和发育障碍女性与无智障和发育障碍女性的产后门诊就诊情况。
使用 2012-2015 年马萨诸塞州所有支付者索赔数据库,确定 2012-2014 年期间患有智障和发育障碍且分娩活产的女性,并按婴儿出生年份与 3 名无智障和发育障碍的女性相匹配。在产后 1 年内对女性进行随访。分析于 2019 年进行。泊松回归比较了早期(产后 21-56 天)和晚期(产后 57-365 天)产后和其他门诊就诊符合指南的情况。检查了非产后护理就诊的类型。
共有 962 名和 2886 名患有智障和发育障碍的女性和无智障和发育障碍的女性分别纳入了样本。在患有智障和发育障碍的女性中,分别有 23.9%和 33.3%在早期和晚期产后期间就诊,而无智障和发育障碍的女性分别有 25.2%和 32.1%在早期和晚期产后期间就诊(p=0.49,0.59)。患有智障和发育障碍的女性比无智障和发育障碍的女性更有可能进行其他门诊就诊,无论是在早期(63.1% vs 40.3%,调整后的 RR=1.42,95%CI=1.28,1.58,p<0.001)还是晚期(94.2% vs 82.3%,RR=1.11,95%CI=1.08,1.14,p=0.008)产后期间。辅助服务、家庭保健服务和与酒精/药物相关的就诊在智障和发育障碍女性中更为常见。
智障和发育障碍女性接受符合指南的产后就诊的可能性相同,但进行其他门诊就诊的可能性高于其他女性。需要进一步研究以评估就诊质量,并确定支持智障和发育障碍女性在产后期间的最佳实践。