• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释智障人士生殖健康不平等问题:一项元叙事综述方案。

Explaining reproductive health inequalities among people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-narrative review protocol.

作者信息

Kaley Alexandra, Eastham Rachael, McMahon Martin Joseph, Merrett Nicola

机构信息

University of Essex - Colchester Campus, Colchester, UK

Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e085459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085459.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085459
PMID:39645251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11629004/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

People with intellectual disabilities experience health inequalities at a greater level than their non-disabled peers. Notably, while general health status is starting to receive some attention, the reproductive health and rights of people with intellectual disabilities continue to be understudied from a policy and research perspective. The objective of this review is to elucidate the complex interplay between individual, social and structural factors that influence reproductive health outcomes for this population. The findings will be used to develop a theoretical framework to explain how and why reproductive health inequalities persist for people with intellectual disabilities and to identify gaps in the knowledge base to inform future research on this topic.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A six-stage meta-narrative review will be undertaken to synthesise the available evidence that seeks to explain the reproductive health inequalities experienced by people with intellectual disabilities and the factors contributing to these inequalities. The protocol for this review was developed in accordance with the Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards publication standards, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol guideline is completed to ensure transparency.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This meta-narrative review protocol does not require formal ethics review because it will be based on published studies. The findings from this review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. We will also produce our findings in a range of accessible and easy-to-read formats.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024495199.

摘要

引言

智力残疾者所经历的健康不平等程度高于其非残疾同龄人。值得注意的是,虽然总体健康状况开始受到一些关注,但从政策和研究角度来看,智力残疾者的生殖健康和权利仍未得到充分研究。本综述的目的是阐明影响该人群生殖健康结果的个体、社会和结构因素之间的复杂相互作用。研究结果将用于构建一个理论框架,以解释智力残疾者生殖健康不平等现象持续存在的方式和原因,并找出知识库中的差距,为该主题的未来研究提供参考。

方法与分析

将进行六阶段的元叙事综述,以综合现有证据,这些证据旨在解释智力残疾者所经历的生殖健康不平等现象以及导致这些不平等的因素。本综述方案是根据《现实主义与元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准》的出版标准制定的,并完成了系统评价和元分析方案的首选报告项目指南,以确保透明度。

伦理与传播

本元叙事综述方案不需要正式的伦理审查,因为它将基于已发表的研究。本综述的结果将提交给同行评审期刊,并在国内和国际会议上发表。我们还将以一系列易于获取和阅读的格式呈现我们的研究结果。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024495199。

相似文献

1
Explaining reproductive health inequalities among people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-narrative review protocol.解释智障人士生殖健康不平等问题:一项元叙事综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e085459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085459.
2
Scoping review protocol documenting cancer outcomes and inequalities for adults living with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.范围综述方案,记录成年智障和/或发育障碍患者的癌症结果和不平等情况。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 3;9(11):e032772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032772.
3
Quality of healthcare for people with intellectual disability: a mapping review protocol of the evidence in Australia and countries with similar universal health systems.智障人士的医疗保健质量:澳大利亚及具有类似全民医疗体系国家的证据图谱综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 24;15(3):e094181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094181.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Easy read and accessible information for people with intellectual disabilities: Is it worth it? A meta-narrative literature review.为智力障碍人士提供易于阅读和理解的信息:值得吗?一项元叙述文献综述。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1189-1200. doi: 10.1111/hex.12520. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
6
Approaches used to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities: a realist review.用于预防和减少对学习障碍成年人使用限制措施的方法:一项现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(14):1-64. doi: 10.3310/PGAS1755.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs): protocol for an umbrella review.哪些公共卫生干预措施能有效降低低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)儿童因传染病导致的发病率、死亡率和健康不平等:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 29;9(12):e032981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032981.
10
Cancer inequalities experienced by people with disability: a systematic review protocol.残疾人群体所经历的癌症不平等现象:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 7;14(2):e076070. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076070.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and incidence of physical health conditions in people with intellectual disability - a systematic review.智力残疾者的身体健康状况的患病率和发病率——系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 24;16(8):e0256294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256294. eCollection 2021.
2
Cause of death in adults with intellectual disability in the United States.美国成年智障人士的死因。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Jan;65(1):47-59. doi: 10.1111/jir.12790. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
A comparison of the prevalence of health problems among adults with and without intellectual disability: A total administrative population study.
成年人智力残疾与非智力残疾人群健康问题患病率比较:一项全人群行政研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jan;34(1):316-325. doi: 10.1111/jar.12785. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
4
Postpartum Health Care Among Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.智障和发育障碍女性的产后保健。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
5
Sterilization of those with intellectual disability: Evolution from non-consensual interventions to strict safeguards.对智障者的绝育:从非自愿干预到严格保障措施的演变。
J Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jun;23(2):233-249. doi: 10.1177/1744629517747162. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Reproductive autonomy of women and girls under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.妇女和女童在《残疾人权利公约》下的生殖自主权。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Jan;140(1):128-133. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12351. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
7
Early death and causes of death of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.智力残疾者的早逝及死因:一项系统综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 May;31(3):325-342. doi: 10.1111/jar.12417. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
Mortality in people with intellectual disabilities in England.英格兰智障人士的死亡率。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Jan;61(1):62-74. doi: 10.1111/jir.12314. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
10
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.RAMESES 出版规范:荟萃叙述性综述。
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-20.