• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

27G与23G玻璃体切割手术的特征及临床结果比较

Comparison of Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in 27-Gauge versus 23-Gauge Vitrectomy Surgery.

作者信息

Saleh Omar A, Alshamarti Saif A, Abu-Yaghi Nakhleh E

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Diwanyah, Iraq.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 9;14:1553-1558. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S255162. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S255162
PMID:32606569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7293406/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare characteristics, clinical outcomes and complication profiles of a cohort of patients undergoing 27-gauge versus 23-gauge vitrectomy surgery at a tertiary medical center in the Middle East.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study of indication-matched patients undergoing 27-gauge versus 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for a set of predetermined diagnoses. Data including indications for surgery, clinical exams, visual outcomes, and complications were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients who had 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy were compared with 44 patients who had 23-gauge surgery for matched indications by a single retina surgeon. Mean follow-up was 14 months after surgery. Indications included macular pucker, macular hole, and vitreous hemorrhage. Both the rate of hypotony at postoperative day 1 and the need for sclerotomy stitching at the end of surgery were significantly more frequent in 23-gauge compared to 27-gauge cases (25% in 23-gauge compared to 0% in 27-gauge (p=0.012) and 18% in the 23-gauge compared to 0% in the 27-gauge (p=0.045), respectively). The mean duration of surgery was similar among groups (35 mins in the 27-gauge group versus 39 mins in the 23-gauge group (p=0.116)), and all eyes achieved anatomic success. In the 27-gauge group, best-corrected visual acuity improved from a mean of 20/90 at baseline to a mean of 20/40 at 1 month (p=0.005) and in the 23-gauge group from a mean of 20/95 to 20/50 (p=0.001) with no statistical difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients undergoing vitrectomy at a tertiary eye center, the rate of hypotony and the need for sclerotomy suturing were significantly less in the 27-gauge group versus the 23-gauge group. Surgical outcomes were similar in both study groups. The use of the novel 27-gauge instrument system is useful in selected vitreoretinal diseases and appears comparable to the widely used 23-gauge system.

摘要

目的

比较中东一家三级医疗中心接受27G与23G玻璃体切除术的一组患者的特征、临床结局及并发症情况。

方法

这是一项对因一系列预定诊断而接受27G与23G玻璃体切除术的适应症匹配患者的回顾性比较研究。记录并分析包括手术适应症、临床检查、视力结局及并发症等数据。

结果

由同一位视网膜外科医生对22例行27G玻璃体切除术的患者与44例行23G手术的匹配适应症患者进行比较。术后平均随访14个月。适应症包括黄斑皱襞、黄斑裂孔及玻璃体积血。与27G病例相比,23G病例术后第1天的低眼压发生率及手术结束时巩膜切开缝合的需求显著更高(23G为25%,27G为0%(p = 0.012);23G为18%,27G为0%(p = 0.045))。两组手术平均时长相似(27G组为35分钟,23G组为39分钟(p = 0.116)),所有术眼均获得解剖学成功。27G组最佳矫正视力从基线时的平均20/90提高至1个月时的平均20/40(p = 0.005),23G组从平均20/95提高至20/50(p = 0.001),两组间无统计学差异。

结论

在这家三级眼科中心接受玻璃体切除术的这组患者中,27G组的低眼压发生率及巩膜切开缝合需求显著低于23G组。两个研究组的手术结局相似。新型27G器械系统在特定玻璃体视网膜疾病中有用,且似乎与广泛使用的23G系统相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in 27-Gauge versus 23-Gauge Vitrectomy Surgery.27G与23G玻璃体切割手术的特征及临床结果比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 9;14:1553-1558. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S255162. eCollection 2020.
2
Short-term outcomes of 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy.23G经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切除术的短期疗效
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;146(2):193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
3
Outcomes of 27 Gauge Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery for Posterior Segment Disease.27Gauge微创玻璃体切除术治疗眼后段疾病的疗效
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;161:36-43.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Comparison of safety and effectiveness between 23-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy surgery in common vitreoretinal diseases.23 号和 25 号玻璃体切割手术治疗常见玻璃体视网膜疾病的安全性和有效性比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0248164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248164. eCollection 2021.
5
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing 27-Gauge Vitrectomy to 23-Gauge Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes and Full-Thickness Macular Holes.一项比较27G玻璃体切除术与23G玻璃体切除术治疗视网膜前膜和全层黄斑裂孔的前瞻性随机研究。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 29;35(3):259-266. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_318_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
6
Comparative study of 23-gauge vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.23 号与 20 号玻璃体切割术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的对比研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;249(10):1459-68. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1645-5. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
7
25-Gauge sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.25G无缝合玻璃体切除术与20G玻璃体切除术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的比较
Retina. 2009 Apr;29(4):444-50. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318196b19c.
8
Comparison of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy results in patients with epiretinal membrane: 6-month follow-up.27G 与 25G 玻璃体切割术治疗眼内膜疾病的疗效比较:6 个月随访。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;40(4):867-875. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01250-1. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
9
Postoperative complications associated with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy.25G玻璃体切割术后的相关并发症
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007 Jul-Aug;38(4):270-5. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20070701-01.
10
SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF 27-GAUGE VITRECTOMY FOR A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 163 EYES WITH VARIOUS VITREOUS DISEASES.连续163只患有各种玻璃体疾病的眼睛行27G玻璃体切割术的手术结果
Retina. 2017 Nov;37(11):2130-2137. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001442.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased late-onset glaucoma risk following vitrectomy for macular pucker or hole.黄斑皱襞或裂孔行玻璃体切割术后晚期青光眼风险增加。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Sep;38(13):2631-2637. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03096-z. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing 27-Gauge Vitrectomy to 23-Gauge Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes and Full-Thickness Macular Holes.一项比较27G玻璃体切除术与23G玻璃体切除术治疗视网膜前膜和全层黄斑裂孔的前瞻性随机研究。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 29;35(3):259-266. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_318_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
3
Clinical Performance Comparison of Ultrahigh-speed Dual Pneumatic Vitrectomy Probes: Is Faster and Smaller Better?超高速双气动玻璃体切割探头的临床性能比较:速度更快、尺寸更小是否更好?
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr;38(2):122-128. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2023.0109. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
The Clinical and Safety Outcomes of 27 Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Eyes With Macular Hole.黄斑裂孔眼行27G玻璃体切割术的临床及安全性结果
Cureus. 2022 Apr 23;14(4):e24409. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24409. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Outcomes of Primary 27-Gauge Vitrectomy for 73 Consecutive Cases With Uveitis-Associated Vitreoretinal Disorders.连续73例葡萄膜炎相关性玻璃体视网膜疾病患者接受27G原发性玻璃体切除术的结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 27;8:755816. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.755816. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical comparison of 27-gauge and 23-gauge instruments on the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy surgery for the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases.27G 和 23G 器械行睫状体平坦部玻璃体切除术治疗眼后段疾病的临床效果比较。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 May;31(3):185-191. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000659.
2
Hybrid 23/27 Gauge Vitrectomy - Combining the Charm of 27G with the Efficacy of 23G.23/27G混合玻璃体切除术——兼具27G的优势与23G的疗效
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 31;14:299-305. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S233884. eCollection 2020.
3
Multicenter survey of sutureless 27-gauge vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a consecutive series of 410 cases.多中心 27G 免缝线玻璃体切除术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的研究:连续 410 例病例系列。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;257(12):2591-2600. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04448-2. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
International multi-center study of iatrogenic retinal tears in pars plana vitrectomy.玻璃体切除术中医源性视网膜裂孔的国际多中心研究。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):996-1000. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.06.19. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparative Study of 27-Gauge Versus 25-Gauge Vitrectomy With Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Myopic Foveoschisis.27G与25G玻璃体切除术联合空气填塞治疗近视性黄斑劈裂的对比研究
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Oct 1;49(10):e135-e142. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20181002-16.
6
Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.27G和25G玻璃体切割日间手术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的手术效果
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;39(9):1973-1980. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-1030-z. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane.用于特发性视网膜前膜的27G和25G玻璃体切割日间手术
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0585-1.
8
Comparative study of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy performed as day surgery.27G和25G玻璃体切割术日间手术的对比研究
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1575-1582. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0625-0. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
9
Making the Jump to 27-Gauge Vitrectomy: Perspectives.迈向27G玻璃体切除术:观点
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Jun 1;48(6):450-456. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20170601-02.
10
27-GAUGE VITRECTOMY WOUND INTEGRITY: A Randomized Pilot Study Comparing Angled Versus Straight Entry in Fluid-Filled Vitrectomized Eyes.27 号规玻璃体切割术伤口完整性:一项比较充液玻璃体切割眼中斜入式与直入式的随机初步研究。
Retina. 2018 Apr;38(4):678-683. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001598.