Suppr超能文献

27G和25G玻璃体切割术日间手术的对比研究

Comparative study of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy performed as day surgery.

作者信息

Mori Ryusaburo, Naruse Saigen, Shimada Hiroyuki

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, 101-8309, Japan.

Miyahara Ophthalmological Clinic, Saitama City, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1575-1582. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0625-0. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy conducted as day surgery.

METHODS

In total, 200 consecutive eyes that underwent primary vitrectomy (27-G in 100 eyes, 25-G in 100 eyes) were analyzed. 27-G vitrectomy was performed using a cut rate of 7500 cpm and 25-G vitrectomy using a cut rate of 5000 cpm.

RESULTS

The 27-G and 25-G groups did not differ significantly in underlying diseases and preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score. The time required for vitrectomy was significantly longer in the 27-G group (35.3 vs. 29.8 min, P = 0.0013). Postoperative hypotony was observed in 0 and 3 patients, and ocular hypertension in 10 and 14 patients in the 27-G and 25-G groups, respectively, showing more stabilized postoperative ocular pressure in the 27-G group. Gain in ETDRS score was significantly better in the 27-G group (12.1 ± 20.2 letters) compared to the 25-G group (10.0 ± 21.3 letters) (P = 0.0323) at 1 month post-vitrectomy, but not significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.0686 and 0.0543). Rates of postoperative retinal detachment (1 vs. 1%) and vitreous hemorrhage (2 vs. 3%) were not different between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

27-G vitrectomy requires longer operative time than 25-G, but using the 27-G system results in earlier visual improvement and stabilized ocular pressure.

摘要

目的

比较作为日间手术进行的27G和25G玻璃体切除术的术后结果。

方法

总共分析了200只连续接受初次玻璃体切除术的眼睛(100只眼睛为27G,100只眼睛为25G)。27G玻璃体切除术的切割速率为7500次/分钟,25G玻璃体切除术的切割速率为5000次/分钟。

结果

27G组和25G组在基础疾病和术前糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)评分方面无显著差异。27G组玻璃体切除术所需时间明显更长(35.3分钟对29.8分钟,P = 0.0013)。27G组和25G组分别有0例和3例患者术后出现低眼压,10例和14例患者出现高眼压,表明27G组术后眼压更稳定。玻璃体切除术后1个月,27G组的ETDRS评分提高显著优于25G组(12.1±20.2字母对10.0±21.3字母)(P = 0.0323),但在3个月和6个月时无显著差异(P = 0.0686和0.0543)。两组术后视网膜脱离率(1%对1%)和玻璃体积血率(2%对3%)无差异。

结论

27G玻璃体切除术比25G手术所需时间更长,但使用27G系统可使视力改善更早且眼压更稳定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验